Active clinical trials for "Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency"

Tricuspid regurgitation is common in patients with heart valve disease, both flexible band and rigid ring annuloplasty can correct this anomaly. However, there is no data to address which one can bring more benefits to these patients with combined heart valve disease. This study aims to prospectively compare the efficacy and long term outcomes of flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for the correction of tricuspid regurgitation.

The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the TriClip device in improving clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), who are at intermediate or greater estimated risk for mortality or morbidity with tricuspid valve surgery. This randomized controlled trial will compare the investigational device (TriClip device) to Control (Medical Therapy).

Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement system

To establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Repair System in patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation who have been determined to be at an intermediate or greater estimated risk of mortality with tricuspid valve surgery by the cardiac surgeon with concurrence by the local Heart Team

The objective of this early feasibility study is to gain early clinical insight into Trisol system safety and performance to treat patients with moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has been regarded as a secondary phenomenon of heart failure (HF), mitral valve (MV) disease or atrial fibrillation. Regardless of left ventricular (LV) function or pulmonary artery pressure, presence of moderate or greater functional TR is associated with poor prognosis. When a patient develops functional TR, it causes RV dilation and tricuspid annular enlargement, which also lead to deterioration of TR. A vicious cycle of significant TR, RV volume overload, tricuspid annular dilation and consequent aggravation of TR is accepted as a main determinant of the poor clinical outcome of patients with TR. Therefore, therapies that induce reverse remodeling of the RV and consequently reduce TR, may improve clinical outcomes. However, there have been no proven medical therapies for TR. The investigators hypothesize that carvedilol or empagliflozin is effective on improving RV remodeling in patients with functional severe TR and try to examine this hypothesis in a multicenter, 2x2 factorial, and randomized comparison study using cardiac MRI.

Prospective, multi-center study to assess safety and performance of the Edwards EVOQUE Tricuspid Valve Replacement System

The Enavogliflozin Outcome Trial in Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation (EVENT) was designed to examine the hypothesis that, compared with placebo, therapy with the SGLT2 inhibitor enavogliflozin would improve clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The primary objective of the EVENT study is to test the hypothesis that, compared with placebo, therapy with enavogliflozin for 18 months would improve a composite of cardiovascular events or worsening of TR on follow-up echocardiography in HF patients with functional TR and preserved LVEF. The secondary objective is to examine whether enavogliflozin is effective in reduction of renal events and tricuspid regurgitation, and to evaluate whether beneficial effects of enavogliflozin on primary outcomes are associated with reduction of all-cause mortality.

This study is a prospective design. Patients are severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (≥ 3+) who remained clinically symptomatic after guideline-directed medical treatment. After signing an informed consent form, subjects are enrolled and treated with the DragonFly-T Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair System. All subjects receive clinical follow-up immediately after the procedure, before discharge, 30 days after the procedure, 6 months after the procedure, 12 months, and 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after the procedure. The incidence of MAEs (Major Adverse Events) at 30 days is used as the safety endpoint. The MAEs include stroke, cardiovascular death, new renal failure, endocarditis requiring surgery, and non-elective cardiovascular interventions due to device-related adverse events. The efficacy endpoints include acute procedural success, acute device success, the incidence of all-cause mortality and/or heart failure rehospitalization at 12 months after the procedure, the percentage of patients with tricuspid regurgitation of 2+ or less, the percentage of patients with tricuspid regurgitation reduced by at least one grade, the improvement in 6 minutes walk test, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life change as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score and change in edema scale grading.

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of the VDyne System in the treatment of moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR).