Active clinical trials for "Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms"

This study is a randomized, double-Blind,international multi-Centre, phase III clinical study to evaluate efficacy and safety of HLX10 in combination with chemotherapy versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy and HLX10 versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in previously untreated and potentially resectable patients with TNBC and without distant metastasis. Eligible subjects in this study will be randomized to Arm A or Arm B at 2:1 ratio as follows: Arm A (HLX10 arm): HLX10 + chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel carboplatin) (4 cycles) → HLX10 + chemotherapy (doxorubicin or epirubicin cyclophosphamide) (4 cycles) → surgery → HLX10 (9 cycles) Arm B (placebo arm): Placebo + chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel carboplatin) (4 cycles) → Placebo + chemotherapy (doxorubicin or epirubicin cyclophosphamide) (4 cycles) → surgery → Placebo (9 cycles) The three stratification factors for randomization include: lymph node metastasis (yes or no), size of primary tumor lesion (T1/T2 or T3/T4), asian population (yes or no).

ISIdE is an European, multicentric study that aims to assess the efficacy of Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) in locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer where the disease has progressed despite chemotherapy or within 6 months after the end of curative treatments in order to: evaluate the treatment efficacy in less pretreated patients. identify biomarkers that could predict response or resistance to the drug. 100 patients will be included in this trial.

The investigators propose a randomized phase II clinical trial of talazoparib maintenance therapy in TNBC patients whose tumor showed clinical benefit (platinum-sensitivity) to first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy (monotherapy or combination with other agents). Patients are eligible when they meet at least one of two following platinum-sensitivity criteria: They should have received 6 tri-weekly doses or 18 weekly doses of platinum-based therapy in non-progression status (at least stable disease) at the time of enrollment; They should remain in complete or partial response status after 4-6 tri-weekly doses or 12-18 weekly doses of platinum-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients are enrolled to the trial within 4 to 8 weeks after last chemotherapy and 1:1 randomized to receive talazoparib versus placebo maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint is PFS by RECIST 1.1 after randomization. The secondary endpoints include OS, time from randomization to second progression or death (PFS2), and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, adverse events by CTCAE 5.0 criteria, quality of life evaluated by EORTC-QLQ-C30, and EuroQoL EQ-5D.

Summary Points: High Risk Breast Cancers: Triple negative cancer is considered high risk due to high rate of local and systemic failure. Newer innovative treatment strategies are needed to improve systemic control of disease and survival. Immune system modulation: is an emerging modality in cancer treatment. Tumor antigens can stimulate T cells to identify and destroy cancer cells. Cancers express "altered self" antigens that tend to induce weaker responses than the "foreign" antigens expressed by infectious agents. Thus, immune stimulants and adjuvant approaches have been explored widely. Opportunities to develop effective cancer vaccines may benefit from seminal recent advances in understanding how immunosuppressive barricades are erected by tumors to mediate immune escape. This concept is precisely applicable to triple negative breast cancer due to their antigenicity. Checkpoint inhibitors are an attractive method for treatment of high-risk breast cancers. However, to leverage the efficacy of checkpoint inhibition, approaches are needed to enhance delivery of cancer antigens to the T cells. Cryoablation: offers an efficacious and safe method to enhance tumor antigen presentation to the immune cells while destroying the primary tumor. This ablation method is superior by virtue of antigen preservation in situ despite toxicity to the tumor cell. Impact of cryoablation in enhancing immunological responses in tumor microenvironment are well established; however, cryoablation can also cause tumor antigen tolerance via non-specific stimulation of T cells. Rationale for combining cryoablation and checkpoint inhibitors: Since checkpoint inhibitors curtail the tolerance developed by tumor antigens, and cryoablation enhances antigen presentation and T cell recruitment, it is intuitive that combination of these two approaches presents an ideal opportunity to leverage the benefits of both approaches while curtailing the limitations of either. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize in this study that their combination will improve the response rate and the degree of response.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Camrelizumab in Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel and carboplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).

This research is being done because the investigators are looking for new and better ways to treat a type of breast cancer called triple negative breast cancer. This type of breast cancer can be more difficult to treat than other types of breast cancer as it does not respond to drugs such as hormonal therapies. One type of treatment that looks promising is immunotherapy using new drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors. Immune checkpoints help to regulate the immune system and can stop the immune system from attacking cancer cells. Immune checkpoint inhibitors block this 'off-switch' and aim to help the immune system control the cancer. These drugs have been very effective in other cancers such as melanoma and are now being tested in breast cancer. In this study patients will receive an immune checkpoint inhibitor called avelumab. Half the patients on the study will also receive aspirin tablets for approximately 18 days as the investigators wish to compare the effects of avelumab alone versus in combination with aspirin. Patients will attend hospital approximately five times in order to complete all necessary study assessments. The first visit screens patients for suitability, after which a baseline visit will collect the first of two breast tissue biopsies. At the third visit a single dose of Avelumab will be given via an infusion (a drip in the forearm). Patients will then return approximately two weeks later for a second breast tissue biopsy before having a final follow up visit another two weeks later. Blood and urine samples will be taken at various visits throughout the study to help us learn more about the effects these treatments may have on the immune system and on breast cancer cells.

Patients with stage II-III Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) candidates to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) +/- immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) will be included. Several samples from different tissues will be analyzed through different omics to establish predictive biomarkers of response to the treatment. Multiple algorithms will then be used to look for an integrative predictive algorithm that incorporates multi-parameter inputs in order to develop a clinical tool to assist clinicians in the process of treatment decision-making in TNBC.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacity and safety of pembrolizumab and capecitabine compare to pembrolizumab alone, on the invasive disease-free survival, in participants who have triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with pembrolizumab.

To explore the efficacy and safety of TROP2 in the treatment of ABC

Approximately 104 subjects with recurrent or metastatic IM triple negative breast cancer were planned to be included in the study, and screened eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with the combination of Camrelizumab and investigator's choice of chemotherapy (test arm), treatment with investigator's choice of chemotherapy (control arm), and the stratification factor was liver metastasis (with vs without). After enrollment, subjects in the test group were treated with Camrelizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for one cycle. The investigator's choice of single agent chemotherapy regimen (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) was every 3 weeks for one cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, or discontinuation at the investigator's discretion.