Active clinical trials for "Trismus"

This study compares the effect of two types of suturing techniques in the postoperative swelling and mouth opening after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar. total wound closure will be performed in one group of participants while partial closure will be performed in the other group.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on soft tissue healing and postoperative side effects following third molar surgery. This study was designed on 60 patients as a randomized single-blind clinical trial. The predictor variable was the implementation of CGF fibrin matrix, which was categorized as CGF and non-CGF. The primary outcome variable of the study was the healing of soft tissue around the extraction socket. The secondary outcome variables were pain, swelling and trismus. Data were analyzed using the non-parametric Brunner and Langer model. Statistical significance was set at P < .001.

The present study was to evaluate the effect of topical Arnica and MPSP application with respect to visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, maximal interincisal opening (MIO) and edema values after mandibular impacted third molar removal on days 1, 3, 5 and 10 postoperatively. The following null hypotheses of the present research were determined as follows: usage of topical agents would not influence i) VAS scores, ii) MIO values, and iii) edema values on 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th days after the mandibular impacted third molar surgery

Dental treatments, particularly third molars extraction, can become extremely uncomfortable and painful. They are associated to anxiety, fear and many other unpleasant sensations. During surgery, patients can present cardiorespiratory repercussions of these sensations. This fact generally justifies the employment of methods of monitoring and appliance of safer therapeutic alternatives. Local anesthetics are the most frequently drugs used in dentistry. Vasoconstrictors, particularly epinephrine, are important components of anesthetic solutions to increased time for anesthetic absorption and consequently increasing the duration of anesthesia. The use of smaller amounts of anesthetic solution can reduce the risk of systemic toxicity, however decrease the total surgical time. It is well known that the amount of epinephrine injected into patients during anesthetic procedures can produce adverse hemodynamic effects. Levonordefrin was adding to dental cartridges promising to reduce cardiac stimulation due it less β activity, and maintain the same clinical and systemic effects. But some studies for maxillary or intraosseous infiltrations showed no difference in heart rate and any anesthetic success over epinephrine. Thus, this study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anesthetic mepivacaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 or 1:20,000 levonordefrin employing a clinical trial model of third molars extractions in healthy adults.

Head and neck cancer originate from the several different anatomical subsites especially the squamous cell carcinoma. This involves mainly Oropharynx, Hypopharynx, and Larynx. The common treatment approaches for HNC is radiation therapy, alone or combined with chemotherapy and surgery. In the present scenario, very little literature is available improving the QOL by physiotherapeutic measures in patients with HNC. To improve QOL, a well-designed study is needed. The study will be a two-group pretest-posttest design. The study will include patients with HNC receiving radiation or chemotherapy. One group will receive photobiomodulation therapy and another group will receive Sonophoresis. Both the group will receive Mandibular mobilization and stabilization exercises after electrotherapy. The Algometer, Digital Vernier caliper and core measure Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30) will be used as an outcome measure to measure the effect of interventions between baseline and post-interventions.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Etodalac, Etoricoxib and Dexamethasone are effective for Prevention of Pain ,Swelling and Trismus Following Third Molar Surgery

Trismus is traditionally considered being a late effect of cancer therapy with functional deficits becoming clear in the first year after completing radiation therapy. These deficits can rapidly progress to a state of functional impairment. The most common treatment for trismus is physical therapy comprising an active range of motion (ROM) exercises, hold and relax techniques. Once trismus has developed, it may be hard to reverse. Thus, prevention with a program of self-care is important for managing this side effect. This study want to test the effect with adjunctive devices plus exercise to prevent trismus.

To compare the efficacy of intramuscular injection of two anti-inflammatory drugs, Traumeel and Dexamethasone, used in the control of postoperative complications pain, edema and trismus after third molar extraction mandibular

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of dose regimen of serratiopeptidase (serodase 5 mg) as a prospective, randomized, parallel, double blind Placebo- controlled study.

Third molars extraction is a surgery frequently performed in dentistry. It is generally associated to a great postoperative distress rendered by pain, swelling and trismus, caused by surgical trauma inflammation. Several methods have been proposed to prevent these complications and to increase tissue repair quality. The use of low level laser therapy (LLLT) has been reported in dentistry since 1970. A large number of studies have reported the benefits of LLLT without collateral damage, positive effect as an anti-inflammatory agent and benefits in accelerating wound repair. However, some clinical applications strategies have been contradictories in everyday practice with results not always equivalent. Objective: To verify if a single LLLT intra or extra oral application, singly, are analogous in their effects in controlling postoperative edema, trismus, pain and wound repair in third molar surgery.