Active clinical trials for "Trypanosomiasis"

This case series study follows on a terminated randomised clinical trial in a nearby location of Uganda, in which the combination of eflornithine + nifurtimox showed very promising efficacy and safety. The study's purpose is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in a larger group of late-stage Human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness) patients.

The study determines the diagnostic performance and cost of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) performed on human African trypanosomiasis clinical suspects in peripheral health centres, whether or not followed by serological and/or molecular tests on dried blood spots done at regional reference centres

This study determines the feasibility, diagnostic performance and cost for monitoring of eliminated human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) foci using diagnostic algorithms of serological and molecular high throughput tests with and without previous rapid diagnostic test blood screening for early detection of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense HAT re-emergence.

Tropical fevers have been a diagnostic challenge from the antiquity. Nowadays, despite the availability of good diagnostic capacities, undifferentiated febrile illnesses continue to be a thorny problem for travel physicians. In developing countries, the scarcity of skilled personnel and adequate laboratory facilities makes the differential diagnosis of fevers even more complex. Health care workers must often rely on syndrome-oriented empirical approaches to treatment and might overestimate or underestimate the likelihood of certain diseases. For instance Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) contribute substantially to the burden of persistent (more than 1 week) fevers in the Tropics, causing considerable mortality and major disability. These diseases are however rarely diagnosed at primary health care (PHC) level. The difficulty in establishing the cause of febrile illnesses has resulted in omission or delays in treatment, irrational prescriptions with polytherapy, increasing cost and development of drug resistance. In resource-limited settings, clinical algorithms constitute a valuable aid to health workers, as they facilitate the therapeutic decision in the absence of good laboratory capacities. There is a critical lack of appropriate diagnostic tools to guide treatment of NTDs. While clinical algorithms have been developed for some NTDs, in most cases they remain empirical. Besides, they rarely take into account local prevalence data, do not adequately represent the spectrum of patients and differential diagnosis at the primary care level and often have not been properly validated. The purpose of the study is to develop evidence-based Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)-supported diagnostic guidelines for patients with persistent fever (≥ 1 week) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Sudan, Cambodia and Nepal.

To assess Drug drug interactions between Acoziborole and Dextromethorphan and Midazolam in healthy male volunteers.

Phase 1 bioequivalence (BE) study. This study is for regulatory purpose to determine BE of the tablet formulation used in the clinical trials and the final marketed tablet formulation under fed condition. The study will be an open-label, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, 4-period, single-dose, replicate crossover study under fed condition. The 4-period sequences for the replicate design will be TRTR and RTRT, where R designates the reference formulation and T the test formulation. Subject will be allocated randomly to one of the two sequences of treatments according to the randomization list.

The hypothesis is to evaluate if the treatment with Fexinidazole will lead to a better sustained clearance of the parasites at 6 months of follow-up when in comparison to placebo in patients with chronic indeterminate CD.

This randomized, blind, parallel-group trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nifurtimox (NFX) and Benznidazole (BZN), the two usual interventions to treat the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. The investigators will test whether NFX is an effective trypanocidal agent (by comparison with placebo) and equivalent to BZN (as active comparator) in terms of both parasite-related and safety outcomes. Individuals found seropositive and without clinical signs of dilated cardiomyopathy will receive either of the active treatments or matching placebo. Participants allocated to NFX or BZN will receive either a 60-day (full-dose) or a 120-day (half-dose) active treatment, whereas the control group will receive placebo for 120 days. There will be thus four arms of active treatment (NFX60, NFX120, BZN60 and BZN120), and a fifth control arm receiving placebo (1:1:1:1:1 allocation ratio) where every participant in the trial will take 120 days of study drug (the groups receiving full-dose will complete a 120-day masked treatment with placebo). The study plans to enroll 500 participants from Colombia (in two different geographical areas) and Argentina, in order to explore regional differences in the treatment effects.

The study validates the diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid neopterin quantification and of blood and cerebrospinal fluid trypanosomal spliced leader RNA detection for assessing outcome after treatment of human African trypanosomiasis.

Human African trypanosomiasis HAT, or sleeping sickness, is a tropical disease caused mainly by the parasite Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (gHAT). After a severe epidemic in the 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) now targets elimination of transmission of gHAT by the year 2030, which heavily relies on its diagnosis and treatment. Traditional screening tests (like CATT or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)) are based on the detection of antibodies against the parasite using native antigens, which are costly and dangerous to produce. New serological tests, using recombinant antigens, have been developed, but little is known about their field performance. The primary objective of this study is to assess the specificity of the newly-developed recombinant RDTs, since it will become very relevant as we move forward towards a screen&treat strategy. We will also compare the diagnostic accuracy and overall performance of iELISA and molecular testing.