Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"

This study compares how three doses of semaglutide work in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and overweight who are taking metformin. The study will look mainly at how well participant's blood sugar and participant's body weight are controlled when they are taking the study medicine at different doses. Participants will either get semaglutide [2 milligrams (mg), 8 mg, or 16 mg] or semaglutide placebo (a dummy medicine). Participants will take the study medicine with an injection pen called NovoPen®4. The injection pen is a medical tool with a needle used to inject the study medicine under the skin. The study will last for about 52 weeks. Participants will have 13 clinic visits and 4 phone calls.

To evaluate benefits of primary prevention of major coronary heart disease for asymptomatic coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the coronary artery calcium score Our proposal Based on CAC score, primary early prevention could reduce incidence of major coronary heart disease (CHD) including cardiac mortality, acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization based on CAC score, primary early prevention could reduce all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, heart failure associated hospitalization and chronic kidney disease and related clinical cost effect

The reason for this study is to see if the study drug insulin efsitora alfa (LY3209590) is safe and effective in participants with Type 2 diabetes that have already been treated with basal insulin. The study consists of a 3-week screening/lead-in period, a 78-week treatment period and a 5-week safety follow-up period. The study will last up to 86 weeks.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect and safety of insulin efsitora alfa (LY3209590) compared to degludec in adult participants with type 2 diabetes who are starting basal insulin for the first time. Additional participants will continue to be enrolled in a maximum extended enrollment cohort.

This is a phase 2 study designed to evaluate the efficacy of daily (QD) oral RGT001-075 GLP1 receptor agonist relative to placebo after up to 16 weeks of double-blind treatment as determined by mean change from baseline in HbA1c in adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control with diet and exercise and stable metformin treatment.

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to test a cognitive-behavioural intervention, Problem Solving Treatment for Diabetes (PST-D) in patients with type 2 diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of PST-D compared with the attention control group. To determine the impact of PST-D on patient-centred, behavioural, and psychosocial outcomes. To identify independent factors associated with an improvement in HbA1c and reductions in incidence and progression diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and visual impairment at 18-month follow-up in both groups; and determine if these factors mediate the associations between the PST-D intervention with the above outcomes. To quantify the incremental cost-effectiveness of PST-D compared with the attention control group at 18-month follow-up. To understand participants' views, experiences, and opinions about PST-D; and the barriers and facilitators to program completion. Participants will complete blood tests, ocular examinations, and a series of questionnaires at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up. Participants will also complete the intervention/ control group sessions conducted over the phone, video call, or face-to-face depending on the participant's preference. Researchers will compare the intervention group against the attention control group to determine the effectiveness of PST-D on improving clinical, patient-centred, behavioural, and psychosocial outcomes.

24-week, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of canagliflozin as compared with placebo in reducing the need for mealtime insulin in subjects with type 2 diabetes currently using a basal-bolus insulin regimen.

The purpose of this study is to test the usefulness of an intervention that combines technology with diabetes education and skills training. This study has been designed specifically for African Americans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Diabetes is one of the biggest public health challenges of the 21st century because of the costs associated with its management, which are estimated at more than three billion dollars per year in Quebec. This cost has been growing steadily for 20 years now. A person with controlled diabetes mobilizes three times more medical resources than a person without diabetes (Diabetes Quebec, 2009). This amount increases rapidly with the associated complications. Therapeutic carbohydrate restriction (in an omnivorous context) used specifically to control glycemia is being studied more and more, but has never been verified in a vegan context. Some studies show that a vegan diet could be an effective way to help type 2 diabetics (T2DM) to better manage their blood sugar. Thus, it is necessary to question whether these effects can be accentuated in the context of a low or very low carbohydrate diet. Numerous publications have highlighted the role of the gut microbiota in metabolic diseases, including T2DM. Analysis of the microbiome before and after dietary change combined with daily breath testing will tell us more about possible intolerances and the role of the microbiome in T2DM management. Given the novelty of these hypotheses and its absence in the literature, it is relevant to undertake a first pilot project with a smaller number of participants in order to obtain preliminary data that will allow us to define more precisely the research avenues for a subsequent study.

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate safety of dulaglutide in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India.