Active clinical trials for "Ulcer"

A Prospective, Double-blind, Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-group safety and efficacy study of adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) in the treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU).

The geko™ Cross Therapy REGISTRY - Wound is a prospective, observational, anonymised data collection Registry with no experimental treatment that will fulfil an unmet need for an observational Registry to provide long-term clinical data to demonstrate patient benefit and regulatory compliance.

This is a prospective observational study using data from an existing, ongoing National Swedish registry (SWIBREG). This study is designed to assess the effectiveness and treatment adherence of tofacitinib on clinical disease activity parameters in patients with ulcerative colitis in Swedish clinical practice. The study will also assess treatment adherence of tofacitinib using the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.

The goal of this trial is to create personalized treatments for each patient admitted to the hospital with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). The study will test the feasibility and acceptability of these treatment strategies among patients and physicians so that the study team can later do a larger trial to test whether the medication treatment pathways help patients avoid colectomy while ensuring patient's are safe.

The main aim of this study is to learn about the effect of treatment with vedolizumab IV (vedolizumab) together with tofacitinib in adults with moderate and severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Another aim is to learn about treatment with Vedolizumab alone after the double treatment. All participants will receive vedolizumab together with tofacitinib for 8 weeks and will be checked for response. Participants who show a response to the treatment after 8 weeks will be treated with vedolizumab alone for an additional 44 weeks. Each participant will be followed up for at least 26 weeks after the last dose of vedolizumab.

The main aim of this study is to learn how the body of a child or teenager with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) processes vedolizumab (pharmacokinetics) given just under the skin subcutaneously (SC). The participants will be treated with vedolizumab for up to 34 weeks. During the study, participants will visit their study clinic several times.

This is a dose ranging exploratory phase 1 pilot study to assess engraftment, safety, and efficacy of CP101, an oral microbiome therapeutic, in participants with active mild-to-moderate Ulcerative colitis. A total of 30 patients who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to either a short or extended induction dosing with CP101. An assessment of the microbiome will occur at baseline, Day 6, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, and Week 24.

This study will enroll 60 patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis as subjects. They will be randomly divided into two groups: the TCM group received QHQYP rectal instillation, while the control group received mesalazine enema. The treatment period for both groups was 8 weeks. The modified Mayo Activity Index will be used as the main evaluation index. Secondary evaluation indices will include the Underwater Endoscopic Severity Index (UCEIS) score, endoscopic Baron score, mucosal histological score (Geboes index), Chinese medicine syndrome efficacy evaluation, quality of life score, physicochemical indicators reflecting disease activity or remission, intestinal microbiota indicators, and changes in inflammation and immune-related indicators in colonoscopy biopsy tissues. Safety indicators were also monitored.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare safety and performance of the study device to the current typical NHS standards of care device. The main outcomes it aims to achieve are: Complete wound healing at 12 weeks (100% epithelialised) % Reduction in wound area at 12 weeks Participants will attend their NHS podiatry clinic appointment as normal and will be assigned either the study device or the current typical NHS standard of care device. Researchers will compare the study device group to the standard group to assess the outcomes mentioned previously.

Despite conflicting and contradictory evidence regarding its efficacy, some wound care centres have advocated and adopted ozone for treating DFU. However, there are gaps in the application of topical ozone therapy. Reported no significant impact on the healing process of DFU, and not all said that topical ozone can enhance the healing process. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of topical ozone therapy in conjunction with standard wound care versus routine wound care alone in treating DFU. The wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIFI) scale was used to measure wound size, the tissue survival rate at DFU, infection, peripheral microcirculation, glycemic control, Hba1c control, and wound healing.