Active clinical trials for "Angina, Unstable"

To investigate the risk factors involved in the occurrence and prognosis of the patients with acute coronary syndrome, patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention will be recruited and followed up for at least 2 years.

PROPHET-FFR is a single center ambispective registry aiming to explore the impact of post-revascularization functional assessment on later outcomes.

The International Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes registry study in Transitional Countries (ISACS-TC) is both a retrospective and prospective study which was designed in order to obtain data of patients with acute coronary syndromes, and herewith control and optimize internationally guideline-recommended therapies in these countries Further study details as provided by the CINECA http://isacs-ct.cineca.org/

With the Emergency Medical Services (EMS), no prehospital risk stratification and triage is performed for patients suspected of having an Non-ST-segment elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS). While the latest ESC Guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy within 24 hours for all high risk NSTE-ACS patients and same-day transfer to a PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) center. With the potential emerging logistical problem surrounding this, prehospital risk stratification and triage can have great benefits in this population as well, especially in patients with a high risk of having an NSTE-ACS. The recently validated PreHEART score makes it possible to stratify patients in a low-risk and high-risk group for having a NSTE-ACS and gives the EMS the opportunity to make triage decisions in the prehospital setting. Patients with a high risk for having an NSTE-ACS are transferred directly to an PCI-center for further diagnostic work-up. Patients with a low risk for having NSTE-ACS and transferred to the ED of the nearest hospital without PCI facilities (non-PCI center) for further diagnostic work-up, resulting in an optimization of the regional care utilization. This is the first study to focus on patients who are at a high risk of having an NSTE-ACS and to assess if whether prehospital triage using the PreHEART score is able to significantly reduce time to final invasive diagnostics and revascularization in patients in need of coronary revascularization.

Despite the well-known health benefits of physical exercise in the prevention of chronic diseases, less attention has been focused on the use of physical exercise as an essential part of good treatment for chronic disease. The aims of the study are to investigate the feasibility, medical effects, cost-effectiveness, and social perspectives of the individualized exercise-based rehabilitation [2 different high-intensity training (HIT) protocols combined with usual care (UC)] after acute coronary artery disease (CAD) event. The medical aim is to study mediating mechanisms of the physiological, biochemical and molecular effects of exercise training on the clinical outcomes. The aim of the health-economic evaluation is to assess the changes in the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) and health care related costs for estimating the cost-effectiveness of HIT-based exercise rehabilitation. The purpose of the sociological analysis is to find out the social processes which make possible the emergence of the desired welfare effects.

Approximately 5 to 8% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions requires chronic anticoagulant therapy due to atrial fibrillation or other clinical entities. There are many possible different combinations of the antithrombotic therapy after stent implantation in these patients. Aim of this observational study is to evaluate the real world antithrombotic treatment in patients requiring anticoagulant therapy undergoing stent implantation and to compare the clinical outcome of patients treated with new oral anticoagulant drugs compared to warfarin. The study is prospective, performed in different Italian hospitals and aimed to enroll 1080 patients with a 1 year follow up

The purpose of this study is to compare DEB with BMS in CAD patients who are at high risk of bleeding and in whom the use of DES is therefore avoided. Our hypothesis is that PCI with DEB is non-inferior to BMS in the treatment of stable CAD or in ACS (UAP or NSTEMI) in patients at high risk of bleeding.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether enoxaparin (an anticoagulant) is effective in the treatment of patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain and no electrocardiogram or bloodwork evidence of a heart attack, but with other high risk clinical features

Drug eluting stents (DES) are widely used for treatment of coronary artery lesions. The Xience Sierra stent has a refined design of the metal stent backbone and is used in patients with various clinical syndromes and in different lesions. Clinical outcome of patients with previously unknown (silent) diabetes and prediabetes is of increasing interest since the latter group has recently shown to be associated with a significant risk of adverse cardiovascular events after treatment with contemporary DES. Outcome data in a population of high-risk all-comer patients, including many patients with diabetes mellitus and prediabetes, would be of great interest, but such data are not available yet. In addition, there is a lack of data in a general all-comer population. Therefore, the COASTLINE study will primarily assess the safety and efficacy of the Xience Sierra stent in a general all-comer population as well as a high-risk all-comer population.

To compare efficacy and safety of dalteparin compared to unfractionated heparin in patients of non ST elevation acute coronary syndromes who are planned to undergo coronary interventions (angioplasty or bypass surgery)