Active clinical trials for "Urinary Incontinence"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and security of the autologous e-ASC for the urinary incontinence after a radical prostate cancer surgery

The purpose of this research study is to compare the treatment device (Solyx) to a different mesh sling or control device (Obtryx II) for the treatment of symptoms for Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). Safety information and patient outcomes will be collected for three (3) years and evaluated.

The purpose of this clinical study is to compare efficacy and safety of propiverine hydrochloride extended and immediate release formulations in patients suffering from neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

The purpose of this study is to get the effect of IncontiLaseTM procedure; and its impact on urinary symptoms and female sexual function.

This study is a prospective, single arm, non-randomized, multi-center clinical study that will be conducted in Europe. It is designed to assess efficacy and safety of the Virtue® Male Sling in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.

The only class of oral erectile dysfunction (ED) medication on the market are the phosphodiesterase Type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i). This pilot study is being done to evaluate the effect of Mirabegron, an oral beta-3 adrenergic agonist, on men with both Overactive Bladder (OAB) symptoms and mild to moderate ED.

The main objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy on continence, quality of life and tolerance of the sub-urethral tape I-STOP on male patient suffering of incontinence significant and embarrassing after a radical prostatectomy.

A study to compare efficacy in surgical treatment for SUI (Stress Urinary Incontinence), tot with minisling.

This is multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, dose-escalating clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of desmopressin orally lyophilisate for the treatment of nocturnal enuresis "with decreased nighttime urinary osmolality."

Alarm-treatment as well as Desmopressin, a synthetic analogue of human vasopressin, are considered the only evidence-based medicine (EBM) IA treatments in monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (MNE). Desmopressin exists in three different formulations for ambulant use: nasal spray, tablet and lyophilisate (MELT) each with differences in bioavailability (spray 2%, tablet 0.2%, MELT 0.5%). There 's insufficient evidence to confirm the actually used bioequivalent doses ( 10µg spray = 120µg MELT= 0.2mg tablet). Although so frequently used, very few pharmacokinetic and -dynamic data on desmopressin are available for children. Due to prolonged half life, associated with waterintoxication,the nasal spray has a black box warning from the FDA and is no longer recommended . For some authors oral formulations appear to be a safer alternative. However, based on clinical experience of less response rate with oral formulations, lower biodisponibility is suspected. Adult research confirms low bioavailability of tablets but also show major influences by food-intake and changes in gastro-intestinal motility. To achieve maximum efficacy, recommendations are to take desmopressin tablet 1 hour before bedtime and 2 hours after meal: this is unrealistic in schoolaged children since there never is 3 hours between evening meal and bedtime. In 2005 a dose response study demonstrated superior pharmaco-kinetic and dynamic properties for desmopressin Lyophilisate MELT formula. Since these results implicate superior action of MELT, often a change to MELT is recommended if there is a suboptimal response with tablet: sublingual absorption would eliminate the influence of food-intake. However, for this statement there's no evidence, since these tests were all conducted in children in fasting condition. Only one clinical study demonstrates bioequivalence for MELT and tablet. Hypothesis is that desmopressin MELT formulation has a better bioavailability when administered together with meal due to its sublingual absorption.