Active clinical trials for "Urinary Incontinence, Stress"

This multi-center clinical trial will evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of hybrid fractional 2940 nm and 1470 lasers for improvement of symptoms of urinary incontinence.

The objective of this study is to compare the effect of outpatient pelvic floor muscle training versus home pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The hypothesis of this study is that home pelvic floor muscle training is as effective as outpatient pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

A pilot study to determine the degree and effectiveness of the various modes of vSculpt, an over-the-counter "OTC" medical device, on enhanced genital blood flow and improvement in quality of life in menopausal women who suffer sexual dysfunction and stress incontinence

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture combined with biofeedback electrical stimulation on female stress urinary incontinence. Methods: 90 patients diagnosed in a hospital from January 2020 to January 2021 were randomly divided into three groups A, B and C, and group A was treated with biofeedback electrical stimulation, 3 times a week for 30 minutes for 15 times. Group B used acupuncture treatment, including Guanyuan, Qihai, Zhongji, Zusanli, Sanyinjiao and Yinlingquan, once a day, Monday to Friday, 30 minutes each, a total of 10 times. Group C was treated with acupuncture combined with biofeedback electrical stimulation. All three groups were combined with pelvic floor muscle training. After treatment, the changes in class I, II muscle fiber, ICI-Q-SF score, and urine leakage in the 1h pad test were compared.

The goal of this interventional study is to compare the effect of Concurrent cystocele repair and trans obturator tape (TOT) and TOT alone in a sample of Iraqi Female participants with diagnosed stress urinary incontinence and cystocele. The main questions to answer are: 1-What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the outcomes measured by The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System? What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the degree of pelvic organ prolapse? What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the frequency, severity, and effect of Stress urinary incontinence on the quality of life of the patients? What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on the quality of the patient's life? Female Patients diagnosed with SUI indicated for intervention were divided into 2 groups Group I: (n=49) offered TOT alone Group II: (n=49) offered concurrent TOT and Cystocele Repair Patients were then followed up and evaluated using The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System, The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and the King Health Questionnaire (KHQ). The efficacy of both procedures and their impact on SUI and quality of life was measured.

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare the effects of electrostimulation in addition to pelvic floor muscle training and pelvic floor muscle training alone on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, urinary incontinence and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence. The main questions are: What is the effect of electrostimulation combined with pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle function, symptoms of urinary incontinence and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence? What is the effect of pelvic floor muscle training program on pelvic floor muscle function, symptoms of urinary incontinence and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence? Which intervention is more effective - electrostimulation with pelvic floor muscle training or pelvic floor muscle training alone? Participants will be evaluated before and after the interventions with the following methods: International Incontinence Counseling Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) Pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance will be assessed with a "Pelvexiser" perineometer.

Stress Urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common health condition in female population. Although its prevalence increases with the age, women of all ages could be affected. Several epidemiological studies have shown an association of SUI with Low Back Pain (LBP) demonstrating, moreover, that the presence of one condition may predispose the patient to the onset of the other. Concerning the LBP, the clinical practice guidelines provided recommendations for physical rehabilitative treatment. Different techniques and physical exercises have been developed and it is difficult at the date to affirm the superiority of one approach as compared to another. Moreover, the crucial role plays by the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) both as an integral part of trunk and lumbo-pelvic stability and in maintenance of urinary continence, lead the pelvic floor muscles disfunction to be associated both with SUI and LBP, making the PFM rehabilitation a useful approach in both the conditions. In this rehabilitative context the present study aims to verify the effectiveness of a global physical approach based on postural re-education combined to the pelvic floor rehabilitation in women with diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence associated with non-specific chronic low back pain.

When the studies in the literature including the mini-sling procedure and the laparoscopic buch colposuspension procedure are examined, it is seen that both methods are successful in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but there is no study in which both procedures have been found to be superior to each other in terms of efficacy and safety. The aim of this study is to compare the minisling suburethral sling and laparoscopic buch colposuspension application in terms of efficacy and side effects in patients who will undergo surgical treatment due to genuine SUI.

Urinary incontinence (UI) is defined as any involuntary loss of urine. It affects a significant percentage of the population, mainly female, with a prevalence of 21.4% in Portuguese women, having a negative impact on quality of life and sexual function. About half presents with stress UI (SUI), followed by mixed UI (MUI), with isolated urgency UI being less common. Pelvic floor rehabilitiation is a first line treatment for SUI and MUI, however, it is not yet defined which is the best treatment program or the ideal strategies to improve adherence to it. Telerehabilitation assumed a leading role in the covid pandemic phase, although there are few studies on pelvic floor rehabilitation for UI, none in Portugal to date. The authors aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid program of pelvic floor rehabilitation in female patients with SUI and MUI with a predominance of SUI, including consultation and face-to-face sessions complemented with telerehabilitation.

The study is intended to assess the safety and efficacy of Carbon dioxide AcuPulse laser treatment in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Eligible subjects will be randomized to either receive 3 laser or 3 sham treatment sessions, 4 weeks apart and 3 follow up visits 3, 6 and 12 months following the last treatment.