Active clinical trials for "Urinary Tract Infections"

This study is aiming to evaluate the sensitivity of uropathogens isolated in patients with community acquired UTI with Enoxacin in comparison to other antimicrobials. While Secondary objective is to study the spectrum of uropathogens responsible for community acquired UTI in local population

The objective is to determine if data from the National Insurance Health card (giving antibiotics and hospitalizations in the past 18 months) allow to predict the individual risk of antibiotic resistance and to identify population groups for which probabilistic antibiotics regimen of urinary tract infection could be simplified

Between 2013-2014, our study network of U.S. emergency departments, EMERGEncy ID NET, found that the rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli was 11.7% among all patients, 6.3% in uncomplicated and 19.9% in complicated. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were found in 7.7% of all cases, 2.6% in uncomplicated and 12.2% in complicated. More recently, Enterobactericeae and gram-negative non fermenting bacteria have started to show resistance to carbapenems (CREs and CR-NF). Patients hospitalized with UTI and urosepsis represent a higher risk population for infections due to multi-drug resistant bacteria and experience serious adverse outcomes, including death. EMERGEncy ID NET will conduct a study to determine the prevalence of ESBL-producing, CREs and CR-NFs among this high risk population of patients admitted for UTI from U.S. emergency departments.

The aim of this study was to compare the etiologic agents, the antimicrobial resistance rates, and the risk factors associated with a HA-UTI and CA-UTI among complicated and uncomplicated UTI patients in a tertiary-care hospital in Mexico. This study was performed according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki with the approval of the Local Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UR14-004). All patients with a UTI and a positive urine culture (> 100,000 UFC/mL) from March to October 2015 were included. The study was carried out at the Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González" hospital, a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Monterrey, Mexico. Identification and susceptibility antibiotic assays were performed to all isolates from positive urine culture.

Sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid is available to clinicians through an Expanded Access Program for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections due to quinolone nonsusceptible uropathogens after an initial course of effective intravenous therapy. The investigational product may be requested by sending an email to the Sponsor (EAProgram@iterumtx.com), as listed on the Reagan Udall EAP Navigator website (https://navigator.reaganudall.org/company-directory/i).

The objective this trial is to compare immediate and 12 hours postoperative removal of urinary catheter after elective cesarean section; and whether early removal is associated with lower risk of urinary infection compared with delayed catheter removal.

At an academic tertiary referral center, patients with pelvic floor dysfunction, scheduled for outpatient cystoscopy or urodynamic testing will be asked to participate in the study. Patients will be called one day after the examination and will be asked about pain and their general state of health. The purpose of this study it to investigate pain perception in urogynecologic patients during outpatient cystoscopy and compare it with pain perception during outpatient urodynamic. The investigators will also investigate the difference between anticipated and actual pain perception. The investigators will test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in patients´ pain perception between outpatient cystoscopy and urodynamic testing. The secondary hypothesis will be that there is no difference between patients´ anticipated amount of pain and the actually experienced pain during cystoscopy and urodynamic testing. According to power calculation, a sample size of 52 patients per group will be needed to detect a 2 cm difference in pain scores on the VAS - judged as a clinically significant difference - with 95% power and a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Exclusion criteria are: age ≤ 18 years, insufficient ability to understand German, pregnancy and the participation in another clinical study at the same time.

Recurrent UTIs are common among patients on IC. These create significant patient morbidity and healthcare burden. In desperation, many physicians prescribe prophylactic oral or intravesical antibiotics. This practice is common among our Gillette clinic patients. However, the benefit is unclear and the risks are not insignificant. As such, practice variation is significant. In order to better define the evidence for or against gentamicin bladder irrigation and thus inform clinical practice both locally at our Gillette urology clinic and for practitioners at large we will pursue the following specific aims: Compare rates of symptomatic urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria among a population of Gillette patients on IC with and without gentamicin bladder instillation. Compare antibiotic resistance rates among a population of Gillette patients on IC with and without gentamicin bladder instillation.

The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors associated with indwelling urinary catheters, as well as to assess the nurses' knowledge and adherence to hospital policies. The study will also include a very extensive literature search in an attempt to create a national standard or guideline.

In the last years urinary tract infections (UTI) and pyelonephritis have been the most common reason for readmission to our hospital after birth. UTI is know to be one of the leading causes of postpartum fever affecting about 3%-8% of all postpartum women. The investigators hypothesize that collecting urine cultures pre- and postnatally may help identify women at risk for developing UTI, while treating women with positive cultures could decrease the rehospitalization rate due to postpartum fever. Collecting data during delivery may help identify women at risk for this complication.