Break Wave(TM) Extracorporeal Lithotripter First-in-Human Study
Renal CalculiUrinary CalculiThis is a prospective, open-label, multi-center, single-arm (non-randomized) study to assess the safety and effectiveness of breaking stones in the upper urinary tract using the SonoMotion Break Wave technology. Up to 30 subjects will be included. The procedure will be performed in a hospital surgical environment as an outpatient (without being admitted) or in a non-surgical environment such as a clinic or office procedure room. The procedure will be performed under varying levels of anesthesia ranging from no anesthesia to general anesthesia (fully asleep). Stones will be limited to ≤ 10 mm for lower pole stones and ≤ 20 mm everywhere else. Safety will be measured by the self-reported occurrences of adverse events, unplanned emergency department or clinic visits, and the need for further intervention. Fragmentation will be measured by self-reported stone passage and a comparison of computed tomography (CT) images before and after the procedure.
Effect of Furosemide on ESWL Outcomes for Renal and Ureteral Calculi
UrolithiasisNephrolithiasis2 moreThe minimally-invasive extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedure is generally considered the best first-line treatment option for most adults and children with nephrolithiasis, especially when the calculi are smaller than 2 cm in size. Despite some promising results, few clinical trials have assessed the impact of furosemide on the outcome of ESWL. This study seeks to determine the effect of furosemide on ESWL outcomes when treating renal and ureteral calculi, hypothesizing that it will result in better outcomes for patients. The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial includes 500 adults aged 18-60 years referring to the ESWL Clinic of Shahid Faghihi Hospital. Using block randomization, the patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups. All patients are to receive sedation with intravenous midazolam and 1000 ml of normal saline 30 minutes before ESWL. The only difference between the groups is that in the furosemide group, 40 mg of furosemide is added to the normal saline in the drug preparation room before administration. All patients are kept under heart monitoring and pulse oximetry until recovery. Pain will be checked for all participants via a telephone interview 24 hours later. The outcomes and possible side effects of ESWL will be evaluated for all patients after two and twelve weeks.
SOUND Pivotal Trial - (Sonomotion stOne comminUtion resoNance ultrasounD)
Kidney StoneUrolithiasis5 moreThe goal of this clinical trial is to test the Break Wave™ system in patients with upper urinary tract stones. The main question it aims to answer is whether the device is safe and effective in fragmenting (breaking) stones. Participants will a) undergo the Break Wave™ procedure, b) have a telehealth visit at 2 weeks, and c) return for an imaging study at approximately 10 weeks post-procedure.
Silodosin vs Tamsulosin as MET
StoneUrinaryThe spontaneous passage rate for ureteral stone less than 1cm causing acute ureteral obstruction is about 50%. Previous Cochrane review has concluded that alpha blocker is likely to increase stone passage rate, reduce time to stone passage, analgesic use and hospitalisations. The European Association of Urology Guideline also recommends giving alpha blockers as Medical Expulsive Therapy to patients with distal ureteric stones >5mm. However there is heterogeneity in different alpha blockers. Silodosin is a recently introduced selective alpha blocker which has a much higher selectivity for the alpha-1-A receptor (17-fold compared with tamsulosin). From previous animal studies, ureteral contraction is mainly mediated by the alpha-1-A receptor, hence silodosin maybe more effective in increasing stone passage compared with tamsulosin. Previous studies and meta-analysis has shown superiority of silodosin over tamsulosin on earlier stone passage and less pain. However, there is no data on Chinese population. The investigators would like to compare the efficacy and side effect profile of Silodosin versus tamsulosin on improving stone passage rate and hence reduce rate of further intervention for stone clearance.
SP TLF Versus Ho:YAG Laser
Urinary CalculiThe investigators aim to compare the performance of the Super Pulse Thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) with that of the standard Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser. The investigators hypothesize that the electronically-modulated laser diodes, of the TFL offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters leading to more efficient (4 times more) and effective stone dusting resulting in production of finer dust particles obviating the need for postoperative ureteric stenting which remains a major source of patient discomfort.
Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Economics of SOLTIVE Compared to Ho:YAG Laser in Urolithiasis
Kidney StoneTo compare intraoperative as well as postoperative outcomes of SOLTIVE Thulium laser compared to Ho:YAG laser for the treatment of urolithiasis. The hypothesis is that utilizing the SOLTIVE Thulium laser for the treatment of urolithiasis will result in a more efficient procedure, with comparable stone free rate to that of Holmium laser and subjective improvement in physician satisfaction.
The Use of Direct Puncture Technique With Mini-PCNL
UrolithiasisA single-center randomized study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of direct puncture of the caliceal system in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. 60 patients Inclusion criteria: all patients aged 18 to 70 years who are planning mini-PCNL, ready to consent to the study ASA scale 1-3 Solitary stone up to 2.5 cm Single access to the caliceal system Exclusion criteria: Active infectious process Coagulopathies Abnormalities of the urinary system
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible...
Urinary CalculiThe aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscope with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure (FURL-ICP) and traditional flexible ureteroscope(f-URL) in the treatment of upper urinary stones ≤ 2cm in diameter. It is designed as a multicenter, parallel randomized controlled trial with two arms. At least 449 patients with upper urinary stones ≤ 2cm in diameter will be invited to participant in this study. Patients will be assigned to intervention group (FURL-ICP group) or control group (f-URL) by a simple random sampling technique with a rate of 1:1. The baseline of participants include demographic data, urine analysis, blood cell analysis, blood biochemical analysis, and urinary computer tomography (CT) with a slice thickness of 2mm. The primary outcomes are postoperative stone-free rate (SFR) of one month by CT scan and postoperative fever rate (body temperature > 38.5 ℃ within 3 days after operation). Secondary outcomes include operating time, degree of ureteral injury, SFR of one day.
Shuotongo Ureteroscopy for Upper Urinary Tract Stones
Urinary CalculiUreteroceleThe purpose of this study is to use the Shuotong ureteroscopy for surgical treatment of patients with upper urinary tract stones, taking advantage of the fact that the Shuotong mirror can be used for simultaneous lithotripsy and stone removal, thus maximizing the discharge of stones from the body and improving the stone removal rate.
Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Without Reverse Insertion of a Ureteral Catheter
Urinary CalculiPercutaneous NephrolithotomyPercutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) is a surgical method for upper urinary calculi. The advent of tubeless PCNL (without indwelling nephrostomy tube) has been proved to be safe and effective in reducing postoperative discomfort, shortening hospitalization time and reducing hospitalization costs. Traditional tubeless PCNL usually involves retrograde insertion of the ureteral catheter, which may cause many ureteral related surgical complications. However, there are few reports on tubeless PCNL without reverse ureteral catheter insertion. The goal of this study is to explore the safety and effectiveness of the tubeless PCNL without reverse ureteral catheter insertion.