search

Active clinical trials for "Urolithiasis"

Results 61-70 of 186

Tamsulosin as Adjuvant Treatment Prior to Endoscopic Ureterolithotomy

UreterolithiasisUreteral Calculi1 more

This a study aiming to compare treatment with tamsulosin versus placebo in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis. The main outcome is the rate of stone free patients.

Terminated8 enrollment criteria

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Contribution of Gene Variants to Idiopathic Urolithiasis

Kidney StonesUrolithiasis1 more

Recent investigations from this group have identified that genetic variants of genes associated with monogenic forms of nephrolithiasis are expressed in idiopathic calcium oxalate kidney stone patients and could influence stone forming risk. Utilizing patient samples from the Mayo Clinic Florida Kidney Stone Registry, we will demonstrate that expression of these heterozygous mutations in idiopathic nephrolithiasis act as genetic modifiers of disease presentation increasing risk of kidney stone formation. Complimented by the analysis of environmental and lifestyle risk factors, these studies will define environmental and genetic susceptibility factors involved in kidney stone formation and reoccurrence.

Enrolling by invitation10 enrollment criteria

Efficacy of Pethidine, Ketorolac And Xylocaine Gel As Analgesics For Pain Control In Shockwave Lithotripsy...

AnalgesiaUrolithiasis

A randomised prospective trial comparing the efficacy of pethidine, Ketorolac, and Xylocaine gel as analgesics for pain control in shockwave lithotripsy.

Completed13 enrollment criteria

Assessment of Fluoroscopy Times With Surgeon Versus Technologist Control

UrolithiasisKidney Stones

This is a prospective randomized trial to study the effect of assigning the control of the fluoroscopic x-ray activation to the surgeon as compared to the radiation technologist. Radiation exposure will be assessed from the collected data, fluoroscopy time, and dose parameters (cumulative absorbed dose and dose area product). From exposure data, entrance skin dose (ESD) and midline absorbed dose (MLD) will be calculated. The primary outcome in this study will be total fluoroscopy time for the procedure. A secondary outcome will be the ESD. The investigators will further analyze the contribution of clinical predictors (e.g. stone size/location) and procedural predictors on fluoroscopy times and ESD. It is hypothesized that a 30% reduction in fluoroscopy time will occur when the operating surgeon is controlling the activation of the x-ray beam.

Completed4 enrollment criteria

Effect of a High Citrate Beverage on Urine Chemistry in Urinary Stone Disease

Urinary Stone

This study will investigate the effect of a patented high citrate beverage on urine chemistry in patients with urinary stone disease (USD). It is a minimal risk study of an over-the-counter beverage called Moonstone, which is commercially available. This study is considered preparatory for the RO-1 and is not intended to produce a definitive outcome regarding kidney stones.

Completed6 enrollment criteria

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) on Reducing Urinary Tract...

Urolithiasis

The purpose of this research study is to test whether administering one dose of an antibiotic before a routine shock wave lithotripsy procedure is more effective at avoiding any urinary infections compared to not taking an antibiotic. This is an important topic to study because urinary tract infections are one of the most common complications after this procedure and there is no clear standard of care regarding the use of pre-procedure antibiotics. Our study results will benefit future patients either by decreasing the rate of infections or decreasing the use of unnecessary antibiotics.

Terminated19 enrollment criteria

Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens for Treating Urinary Stones

Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) Stones

In order to check if a reduction in the frequency and total number of shocks delivered during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) results in a great number of stone-free patients,the investigators compared two different ways of treating urinary stones using SWL.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of OMS201 in Subjects Undergoing Ureteroscopic Treatment for Removal...

Urinary CalculiUrinary Stones1 more

Evaluate the safety and systemic absorption of OMS201 following exposure during ureteroscopy.

Completed14 enrollment criteria

Tamsulosin for Urolithiasis in the Emergency Dept

Ureterolithiases

Urolithiasis is a disease that effects 12% of the population and its incidence is growing. In the US there are over 1.1 million visits annually to Emergency Departments for renal colic. The disease is extremely painful, often requiring large amounts of narcotic analgesia, and results in lost work days. Moreover, up to 30% of patients may eventually require lithotripsy or surgical removal of the stone. Currently there are no medical interventions other than analgesia which are offered to patients. Based on encouraging results from several small European clinical studies, the researchers hypothesize that the administration of tamsulosin to patients with symptomatic urolithiasis will enhance stone passage, and reduce both the time to recovery and the need for surgical intervention or lithotripsy. The researchers will conduct a study by identifying and recruiting patients presenting with urolithiasis in the emergency departments of four institutions. A total of 500 consenting subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: tamsulosin for a maximum of 28 days; placebo for a maximum of 28 days. In addition, both groups will receive standard analgesic therapy. The study team, which will be blinded to treatment status, will monitor each subject's clinical progress and outcome. The primary objectives of this study are: to determine if tamsulosin is effective, and to evaluate the safety of the therapy. Another objective is to identify the most appropriate clinical subgroup(s) for treatment. If the therapeutic benefits observed in smaller clinical studies are replicated, administration of these medications should produce several benefits, including: a reduction in time to pain free recovery and hence a more rapid return to employment; decreased requirements for narcotic analgesia; less need for urological out-patient clinic follow-up; decreased need for surgical intervention or lithotripsy; and substantial cost savings. If this therapy is beneficial, it will represent a major advance in the treatment of urolithiasis. This objective is a major stated goal of the NIDDK (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) Clinical Urology Program, which has a stated mission to improve the treatment of urolithiasis. Kidney stones are a major public health issue, and one person in eight will be affected by the disease. If the hypothesis is verified, the researchers will provide the first medical therapy ever for this disease. This therapy, if effective, will reduce the amount of time a patient is off work because of the pain from the disease, and may also reduce the need for expensive and time-consuming surgical treatments.

Completed23 enrollment criteria

Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency of Holmium Laser Settings on Urinary Stones

Stone UreterStone;Renal1 more

The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to acceptable stone fragmentation during clinical use of the holmium laser when using energy settings 0.2J vs 0.8J. The hypothesis is that holmium laser energy settings 0.8J will require less time than lower energy settings 0.2J for fragmenting urinary stones. The clinical practice is to treat urinary stones until the stone is reduced to fragments ≤ 2 mm in size. This is determined by using the laser fiber which is 273 microns to visually estimate the size of the resultant fragments as described by Patel et al, J Endo 2014. Investigators will standardize the effect of stone size by creating a ratio of stone size to treatment time. In this study, the frequency is set at 15Hz. Thus, the study contains two arms: 0.2J&15Hz, and 0.8J&15Hz. Patients will be randomized into the two groups by the ratio of 1:1.

Completed6 enrollment criteria
1...678...19

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs