Active clinical trials for "Varicose Veins"

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis, may lead to gastroesophageal varices. The quality of life, morbidity, and mortality of MPN patients mainly depend on disease-related symptoms, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. Previous studies have shown that JAK2 V617F has a prominent role in vascular risk and MPN-associated gastroesophageal varices. Portal vein thrombosis and portal cavernoma frequently occur in the MPN population and the management of gastroesophageal varices in these patients are sometimes technically difficult. The aim of this study is to investigate the the characteristics of patients with gastroesophageal varices and portal caver cavernoma with or without JAK2 mutation.

Chronic Venous Disease (CVD) has a high prevalence in the general population of the western world. Varicose veins are the main signs of this disease that are characterized by important pathological vessel wall changes. There are also several symptoms that affect the quality of life of affected patients. The aim of this study is to correlate the main histopathological abnormalities with the type and the intensity of the symptoms.

Gastroesophageal varices occurs in approximately half of the patients with liver cirrhosis. Variceal bleeding is the most common lethal complication directly from cirrhotic portal hypertension. The golden standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal varices and evaluating the risk of variceal bleeding is the esophagogastroduodenoscopy. According to the Baveno VI consensus, for those with high-risk varices (varies needing treatment), either non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic band ligation is recommended for the prevention of the first variceal bleeding. However, the invasiveness and uncomfortableness during the esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure has hindered its routine use in clinical practice, especially in compensated cirrhotic patients. The important role of transient elastography for defining the presence of high-risk varices was highlighted in the Baveno VI consensus workshop that cirrhotic patients with a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) of less than 20 kPa and a platelet count of greater than 150,000/μL can avoid screening endoscopy. In addition, transient elastography-based models (e.g. LSM combined with platelet count, liver stiffness spleen diameter-to-platelet score) were shown to have potentials in distinguish the absence of high-risk gastroesophageal varices. However, this cutoff value of LSM was validated mainly in cohorts with alcoholic or hepatitis C virus dominated cirrhosis. The unmet need is a precise cutoff to rule out high-risk varices in hepatitis B virus dominated cirrhosis, which is an outstanding issue in Asia-Pacific population. FibroTouch (Hisky Medical Technologies Co. Ltd, Wuxi, China) is a new-generation of transient elastography based on a two-dimensional image-guided system to ensure the precise orientation. In the present study, the investigators aim to conduct an international prospective diagnostic trial with 16 sites to develop and validate the diagnostic performance of FibroTouch-based models for assessing risk of gastroesophageal varices bleeding in compensated cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the results of ambulatory treatment on Taiwanese patients with primary varicosities of the lower extremities including the use of endovenous laser, phlebectomy, and sclerotherapy. METHODS: We routinely used tumescent anesthesia and ultrasound-guided approaches for the application of endovenous laser. Vein access was achieved by either a percutaneous or stab wound. The laser power was usually 10 - 20 watts; laser treatment usually was begun from 4-10 cm below the saphenofemoral junction, and stopped around the knee, not over 10 cm below the knee. In the same operation, we used Mueller's phlebectomy and/or sclerotherapy if there were prominent branch varicosities. We instructed each patient to walk around immediately after the operation, to go home, and to come back 1-3 days later for follow-up. Ultrasound scan and venous function follow-up was scheduled at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually.