Active clinical trials for "Varicose Veins"

Varicose veins are enlarged, noticeably bulging veins, which commonly occur in the legs and may cause discomfort. In this study, patients with varicose veins in the legs will be participating. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of two different doses of an investigational drug, Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM), an investigational treatment for varicose veins.

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of foam treatment of varicose veins (foam sclerotherapy) in patients who wear compression bandages for 24 hours or 5 days after treatment.

The purpose of the RCT trial is to determine whether endovenous radiofrequency closure catheter and endovenous radiofrequency closure generator is not inferior to ClosureFast™ and ClosureRFG™ in treating varicose veins of lower extremity.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate pain the patient experienced following treatment of varicose veins with Varithena® compared to radiofrequency ablation.

The purpose of this study was to assess whether endoscopic sclerotherapy with Fibrin Sealant was superior to ligature, with or without Polidocanol, in achieving hemostasis in bleeding esophageal varices and preventing rebleeding. Therapeutic success was defined as survival of the first seven days without clinically significant bleeding.

A pilot randomised controlled trial looking at the setting up of a one stop vein clinic for the treatment of varicose veins and assessing the quality-adjusted life years at 3 months of patients This will be a pilot study which is designed to provide us with enough information for a potentially larger multicentre randomised controlled study.

This trial was designed as a prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial of the FDA-cleared Vari-Lase Bright Tip Fiber compared to commercially available standard bare-tip laser fiber (control) to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins associated with reflux within the great saphenous vein (GSV) and to provide additional data concerning patient satisfaction. Within this evaluation, subject limbs were randomized to one of two (2) treatment groups utilizing a 1:1 randomization ratio. If a subject required treatment of only one limb, that limb was randomized to a treatment group. If a subject required treatment of two limbs, the first limb was randomly assigned treatment and the second limb was assigned the other treatment (the opposite treatment of the other limb). The data was analyzed by treated limb (versus treated subject).All study data were analyzed under the principles of intent-to-treat, in which data are analyzed according to the assigned randomized group regardless of the treatment actually delivered. Subjects were followed at one week, one month, and six months.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Vasculera in reducing post procedural pain, bruising and edema in the post procedure period for patients diagnosed with C2-C5 disease requiring an intervention(s). The hypothesis is that Vasculera will reduce post procedural pain, bruising and edema for patients requiring an intervention. This will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Vasculera is a specially formulated prescription medical food product for the clinical dietary management of the metabolic processes of chronic venous insufficiency. Vasculera has limited side effects, please see the product insert. A total of 110 patients will be enrolled into this study. Patients will be randomized to receive Vasculera (Study Product) or placebo. Study Product or placebo will be prescribed as one (1) tablet twice a day.

This trial is being undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of Juvista in the improvement of scar appearance when administered to approximated wound margins following varicose vein surgery. The results from this trial will be used to select doses for investigation in future clinical trials with the compound.

This is a multi center, randomized, comparison study using two already cleared methods of treatment of the great saphenous vein (GSV). The hypothesis to be tested is that the use of the Venacure EVLT NeverTouch procedure is no worse than the RF ClosureFAST procedure for treatment of the GSV. Evaluation of post operative pain and bruising, quality of life assessments, adverse event assessments, confirmation of long term GSV closure, use of medications are criteria that will be evaluated during the course of this study.