Active clinical trials for "Vasculitis"

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might induce high grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) involving the cardio-vascular system. This study investigates reports of cardio-vascular toxicity associated with treatment including anti-PD1, Anti-PDL-1, and Anti CTLA4 classes using the World Health Organization (WHO) database VigiBase, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris Entrepot de Données de Santé (APHP.EDS), French Système National Des Données de Santé (SNDS) Databases and a retrospective international multicenter registry of ICI-associated myocarditis

This is a pilot study to investigate serum prednisolone profiles in: Patients on high doses of prednisolone for any inflammatory disorder, both in the acute and chronic setting. Patients stepping up from or down to prednisolone therapy in association with a course of high dose methyl-prednisolone or dexamethasone. The study will comprise 3 groups, including those started on high doses of prednisolone acutely in an inpatient or outpatient setting, participants on chronically high doses, and those receiving a several week course of high dose methylprednisolone or dexamethasone. The study aims to measure prednisolone levels at a number of time points to investigate serum profile differences in those receiving prednisolone acutely compared with longer term steroid use. Further samples will be taken to characterise additional metabolic changes.

The purpose of this study is to identify the most promising therapeutic strategy for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and inadequate response to standard of care therapy. It will evaluate the efficacy to induce remission of three different salvage strategies including: a combination of rituximab with addition of a conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (either methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, but preferentially methotrexate); tocilizumab; or abatacept.

This is a prospective observational study to determine the frequency and magnitude of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) in the acute phase of the disease (within 12 months of diagnosis or relapse and commencement of induction of remission therapy) and its association with clinical outcomes. The investigators will also explore whether CMV reactivation causes an increase in CCR2 expressing monocytes, and whether these monocytes cause persistent kidney damage in AAV. The investigators hypothesise that reactivation of CMV during the initial 12 months following diagnosis or relapse of AAV occurs frequently but is generally asymptomatic. Based on the investigators' preliminary data the investigators further hypothesise that subclinical reactivation of CMV during this period will be associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including the severity of vasculitis, the response to treatment and the damage caused by vasculitis. Finally, they hypothesise that subclinical CMV reactivation leads to amplification of renal damage in AAV through a monocyte CCR2/CCL2 driven pathway. The investigators' research has recently shown that asymptomatic reactivation of CMV is a frequent event in AAV patients, occurring in roughly 25% of AAV patients in remission. However, the frequency of asymptomatic reactivation of CMV during the acute phase of the disease is not known. The investigators have previously shown that CMV infection and surrogate markers of CMV reactivation in patients with AAV are associated with worse outcomes such as reduced kidney function, increased risk of infection and death, increased risk of blood clots and increased stiffness of the blood vessels, which is a risk factor for heart disease and stroke. The investigators also have preliminary findings suggesting that in patients with AAV and CMV reactivation, the more CCR2 expressing monocytes in the blood, the worse the kidney function. If CMV reactivation during the acute phase of the disease is common and linked with worse outcomes, this study may then lead on to future research involving treatment to prevent CMV reactivation aiming to improve patient outcomes. The investigators will be looking to recruit patients under the care of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital with newly diagnosed or recently relapsed AAV in the last 2 weeks who are positive for previous CMV infection.The investigators will follow these patients up with 10 visits over 12 months; where possible these will coincide with participants' usual vasculitis clinic appointments. At each visit the participants will be required to give blood and urine samples and answer questions related to their vasculitis. Kidney biopsy tissue taken at diagnosis will be used to assess mechanisms of injury during CMV reactivation.

The primary goal of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of RPH-104 in subjects with Schnitzler Syndrome using Schnitzler Disease Activity Score (SDAS), which includes the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and the local laboratory C-reactive protein (CRP) result

The RENATO trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that evaluates the efficacy of pioglitazone to improve renal outcomes in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Patients with biopsy-proven kidney involvement of ANCA vasculitis will be included in this trial at diagnosis. All patients will receive a standard of care immunosuppressive (SOC) therapy combining corticosteroids and rituximab (375 mg/m2/week for 4 consecutive weals followed by 500 mg re-infusion every 6 months). They will be randomized 1:1 to receive either pioglitazone 30 mg/day or placebo for 6 months, on top of SOC. The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate that pioglitazone reduces kidney damage, reflected by the early improvement of proteinuria and serum creatinine levels. The secondary objectives will be to assess the efficacy of this drug on the reduction of hypertension and metabolic effects of glucocorticoids, to measure its impact on vasculitis activity and to evaluate the safety profile of pioglitazone in this population.

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a vasculitis of unknown origin, resulting in progressive thickening and stenosis of large and medium arteries (the aorta and its major branches, and the pulmonary arteries). First line therapy of TA consists of high dose corticosteroids (CS) (Mukhtyar et al, 2009). Between 20 and 50% of cases respond to CS alone, with subsequent resolution of symptoms and stabilization of vascular abnormalities (Shelhamer et al, 1985; Maksimowicz-McKinnon et al, 2007). Although second-line agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide) may result in initial remission, relapses remain common when prednisone is tapered (Maksimowicz-McKinnon et al, 2007). Thus, 50% of CS-resistant or relapsing TA patients may achieve sustained remission with the addition of methotrexate (Hoffman et al, 1994). During the last decade, biologics such as anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) and anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) have been used as third-line treatment in refractory or relapsing TA. Almost 90% of CS-methotrexate resistant TA cases responded to infliximab, an anti-TNFα, and sustained remission was obtained in 37 to 76% of the cases (Schmidt et al, 2012; Comarmond et al, 2012; Mekinian et al, 2012). Tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 has given similar results with 68% of sustained remission in refractory TA (Abisror et al, 2013). Irrespective of classical cardiovascular risk factors, the systemic inflammation and CS use play a pivotal role in the occurrence of cardiovascular thrombotic events (CVEs) (Roubille et al, 2015). As CVEs overlap with TA complications it is primordial to drastically taper CS in that vasculitis. We therefore aim to analyses prospectively the long term outcome of refractory/relapsing TA patients.

Hypothesis 1: A reduction in side effects is achieved with monitoring glucocorticoid treatment by using the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) in patients using glucocorticoids. Hypothesis 2: Monitoring treatment by using GTI in patients using glucocorticoids causes a decrease in glucocorticoid toxicity and an increase in the quality of life of patients. Hypothesis 3: With the involvement of the clinical pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team in patients using glucocorticoids, the drug-related problems of the patients are detected and prevented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the glucocorticoid treatment of patients with RA, SLE and vasculitis treated with glucocorticoids prospectively by a multidisciplinary team with GTI. In addition, it was aimed to identify and prevent drug-related problems by reviewing all drugs used in these patients by the clinical pharmacist.

Cryoglobulinemia vasculitis (CV) is a systemic immune-mediated small vessel vasculitis. Rituximab proved effective on main vasculitis signs, with a complete clinical response of 65%. However, CV relapse is noted in up to 40% of patients. Following rituximab, serum Blys concentration significantly increased and may favor relapses. Tribeca is a multicentre randomized controled study comparing safety and efficacy of belimumab to placebo in non infectious cryoglobulinemia vasculitis.

The goal of this multicentre observational study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars to the originator in Canadian patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA), two main forms of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in vasculitis control between originator and biosimilar rituximab? Is there a difference in adverse effects between originator and biosimilar rituximab? In the Canadian healthcare context, are wait times to receive approval (financial coverage) for rituximab shorter for biosimilars compared to originators? Investigators will perform study assessments (including recording disease activity, damage, and adverse events) at the time of participants' usual clinical care visits, at regular intervals for 2 years after starting rituximab (for induction or maintenance treatment) or switching from an originator to a biosimilar as part of their usual care. Researchers will compare outcomes among participants who have received rituximab originators (from 2018 onwards) or biosimilars as part of their usual care, to see if there are differences in relapses, remission rates, damage, serious infections, serious adverse events, and treatment approval wait times.