Active clinical trials for "Varicose Ulcer"

This trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center study of subjects presenting with chronic lower extremity venous ulcers. The study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MIST Therapy® plus standard of care (MIST+SOC) compared to Standard of Care (SOC) alone in the treatment of lower extremity venous ulcers.

This is a prospective, randomised, open label, controlled pilot study to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of the ReCell Autologous Cell Harvesting Device (ReCell) for the management of chronic leg ulcers associated with venous insufficiency. Outcome will be compared between study participants receiving standard care (debridement, compression therapy) and participants receiving ReCell in addition to standard care.

This study aims to determine if the use of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation, applied to various motor points on the lower limb to elicit muscle contraction when combined with compression bandaging accelerates the rate of venous leg ulcer healing.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution in the treatment of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers compared to wound irrigation with saline solution Methodology: Randomised, controlled multi-centre, prospective clinical trial Planned number of subjects: 20 patients in experimental group (Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution) 8 patients in control group (wound irrigation with saline) Products under investigation: Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution Study Duration: 3-4 weeks

Varicose veins are a common problem, affecting up to a third of the western adult population. Most suffer with aching, discomfort, pruritis, and muscle cramps, whilst complications include oedema, eczema, lipodermatosclerosis, ulceration, phlebitis, and bleeding. This is known to have a significant negative effect on patient's quality of life (QoL). Surgery has been used for many years, but it is known that there is a temporary decline in QoL post-op. This was demonstrated in our pilot study. Surgery leads to painful and prolonged recovery in some patients and has the risks of infection, haematoma and nerve injury. Recurrence rates are known to be significant. Duplex of veins post surgery has demonstrated persistent reflux in 9-29% of cases at 1 year, 13-40% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years and 60% at 34 years. 26% of NHS patients were 'very dissatisfied' with their varicose vein surgery. Newer, less invasive treatments are being developed. It would be advantageous to find a treatment that avoided the morbidity of surgery, one that could be performed as a day-case procedure under a local anaesthetic, a treatment that could offer lower recurrence rates and allow an early return to work. These should be the aims of any new treatment for varicose veins. Endovenous Laser Treatment (EVLT) is performed under a local anaesthetic and uses laser energy delivered into the vein to obliterate it. The vein therefore need not be tied off surgically and stripped out. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, cost effectiveness and safety of Surgery and EVLT.

The purpose of this study is to compare the VERSAJET™ device with conventional surgical procedures (performed with a scalpel) in the debridement (removal of unhealthy tissue) of lower limb ulcers. It is hypothesised that the time taken to debride lower limb ulcers will be quicker with the VERSAJET™ device than with conventional surgical procedures.

The study purpose is to compare healing rates, cost effectiveness, quality of life and safety of 12 week compression therapy for the treatment of venous leg ulcers with the 3M™ Coban™ 2 Layer Compression System versus short-stretch compression bandage.

The main objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that a 3 week intensive course of spa therapy can reduce the risk of leg ulcers in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency (C4a-b and C5 of the CEAP classification) at one year.

The objective of this investigation is to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of Biatain Ibu non-adhesive foam dressing compared to Biatain non-adhesive foam dressing.

The objective of this open label extension study (extension to study DK143WS) is to evaluate the safety of Biatain Ibu during 6 -12 weeks of exposure and during a 40 - 46 weeks safety follow-up period.