Active clinical trials for "Venous Thromboembolism"

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Among patients who are receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy, whether with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA), approximately 3-5% who require treatment interruption for a surgery will do so in an urgent/emergency surgery setting. Additionally, there is considerable morbidity and mortality associated with DOAC/VKA management in an urgent/emergency surgery setting. Thus, this prospective registry study aims to identify and compare determinants for perioperative adverse events in DOAC-treated and VKA-treated patients who require an urgent/emergency surgery, and to identify which of these are modifiable. It also aims to describe and compare management of anticoagulant reversal (i.e., non-specific and specific reversal agents) and resource utilization (i.e., blood transfusion) in DOAC- and VKA-treated patients who need an urgent/emergency surgery.

Patients with active cancer are ~5-fold more likely to develop a venous thromboembolism (VTE) than those without. When VTE occurs, cancer patients carry an up to a 3-fold higher rate of thrombosis recurrence and ~twice the risk of bleeding during anticoagulation. Therefore, it is critical to utilize anticoagulants that optimize efficacy while minimizing bleeding risk when treating cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Guidelines list direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of CAT. The strength-of-recommendation for DOACs is based on data from multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing them to LMWHs to treat CAT, with results suggesting DOACs may reduce thrombosis risk but with potentially more frequent bleeding (particularly in those with certain gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers). Observational studies evaluating DOACs for CAT treatment have been published, but these studies have been either single-arm, evaluated cancer subtypes not recommended for DOAC treatment, were of limited sample size and/or employed heterogeneous definitions of active cancer. We seek to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus LMWH for CAT treatment in active cancer patients using a large de-identified electronic health record database. Retrospective cohort analysis using US Optum® De-Identified EHR data. We will use Optum EHR (electronic health records) data from November January 1, 2012 through latest available data (currently September 2020).

This study is a retrospective analysis of observational cohorts using data from prospectively collected administrative/claims data to investigate treatment patterns,healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), direct and indirect costs (where feasible), and safety and effectiveness outcomes in patients with VTE and active cancer or patients with VTE and history of cancer who initiate anticoagulant treatment with a VKA, LMWH or NOACs.

The purpose of this post-marketing surveillance study is to collect and assess information retrospectively on safety and effectiveness of fondaparinux injection in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) whose body weight is 100 kilograms (kg) or more, or to whom fondaparinux was injected 10 mg/day. ("Arixtra" is a trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.)

The appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients admitted to hospital can substantially reduce the overall burden of disease due to venous thromboembolism. However, the use of thromboprophylaxis in medical setting appears to be generally poor leaving at-risk patients unprotected. We aim to analyse the incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic disease following hospitalisation in medical setting and the efficacy of a multicomponent prevention approach in emergency department including systematic evaluation of thrombosis risk factors and remembers of thrombophylaxis indications and modalities for acutely ill medical patients. Design: cluster randomized interventional study - Observational study at patient level Setting: 30 French emergency departments Patients: Patients over 40 years old admitted in participating emergency departments and hospitalized for acute medical reasons. Main judgment criteria: the rate of symptomatic thromboembolic events and severe haemorrhage during a formal 3-months follow-up after hospital admission in patients hospitalized at least 48 hours.

The objective of this retrospective study is to gather information about how fondaparinux is used pre-, peri- and/or postpartum for both the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in order to fill an information gap concerning the off-label use of fondaparinux during pregnancy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a standardized procedure to establish the optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism.

The results of the Prolong study, currently submitted for publication, show that patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolic event who have altered D-dimer levels, measured one month after anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists is stopped, have a high rate of recurrences (about 14%) and a prolongation of anticoagulation is effective in reducing significantly this rate. Those patients with normal D-dimer (about 60% of all patients examined) have a low rate of recurrences (about 5%) and likely a prolongation of anticoagulation in all these patients cannot be recommended. In line with these results, the Prolong-Two study aims at assessing the predictive role for recurrence of D-dimer levels measured: a) during anticoagulation, b) one month after its withdrawal and c) periodically during follow up. Patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (including proximal deep vein thrombosis of a leg and/or pulmonary embolism) which are treated with vitamin K antagonists for not less than 6 months are considered for the study. D-dimer assay is performed during anticoagulation and patients with altered results continue the anticoagulation for 6 more months. Those with normal D-dimer stop the anticoagulant treatment and are again examined one month later. Anticoagulation is resumed for 6 more months in those patients with abnormal D-dimer results but is permanently stopped in those with a normal assay. The latter patients are examined and D-dimer assay performed again every two months to evaluate the natural history of the assay after anticoagulation is stopped and the possible predictive value for recurrence of a change of the assay during follow-up from normal to abnormal results.

To evaluate the trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism, to determine the risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with medical and surgical illness, and to evaluate the efficacy of the anticoagulant therapy in reducing venous thromboembolism.