Active clinical trials for "Venous Thromboembolism"

This is single centre pilot, randomized controlled trial assessing postpartum prophylactic anticoagulation with 3 weeks of LMWH followed by 3 weeks of Aspirin compared to standard of care of prophylactic LMWH for 6 weeks at moderate to high risk of developing VTE.

In this prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel group, feasibility trial; the investigators will objectively assess whether it is feasible to apply the Geko device to critically ill adults for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to usual care with intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs).

Research Question: In adult SCD patients with CVC, is it feasible and safe to conduct an adequately powered RCT to evaluate the use of rivaroxaban as thromboprophylaxis in this population? Study Design: The study is a vanguard pilot double blind multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Participants with SCD and CVC will be randomized to either rivaroxaban 10mg PO daily or placebo for the duration of CVC in situ or for up to one year, whichever is less. After screening (day -7 to day -1), patients will be followed at day 1, months 3 (+/- 15 days), 6 (+/- 15 days), 9 (+/- 15 days), and 12 (+/- 15 days). Study Objectives: The primary objective is to estimate the proportion of eligible patients who will enroll into a trial of thromboprophylaxis. Secondary objectives include (a) document indications for central venous catheter (CVC), (b) summarize duration of CVC insertion prior to enrollment, (c) estimate adherence to the study drug, (d) estimate proportions of participants being compliant with study procedures, and lost to follow up. Exploratory objectives will assess thrombotic, bleeding, and quality of life outcomes.

This is a pilot study, phase III, multi-centre, double blind, randomized controlled trial of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

This project will adapt a currently deployed Clinical Decision Support (CDS) system to deliver a VTE prevention guideline for adult patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We believe this is an ideal PCOR use case given PCORI's continued effort to combat VTE in trauma and our experience previously implementing this guideline. The Our overall goal is to successfully scale, evaluate, and maintain an interoperable TBI CDS across 7 total institutions.

A prospective multicentre study aiming to validate the clinical utility and safety of an optimised low-dose computed-tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) protocol for suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy

Retrospective chart review to be conducted at Methodist Richardson Medical Center (MRMC) in Richardson, TX. All adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 on enoxaparin for DVT prophylaxis will be included. Collected data will be analyzed to determine the safety and effectiveness of the varying enoxaparin doses, and results will be presented at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Midyear conference in December 2022.

This is a 3-phase mixed methods study design. A literature review (Phase 1) has been completed to determine the areas of exploration and to identify challenges faced and the impact of the blood disorder on pediatric patients. Based on Phase 1, Phases 2 and 3, as proposed in this study, will be completed and will include interviews of patients diagnosed with bleeding and thrombotic disorders (phase 2). The interviews will be individual, semi-structured, and consist of open-ended questions to elicit unbiased and in-depth responses to gain an understanding of participant's perspectives on themes predetermined in the study design phase.

The outcomes regiStry for non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagUlants treatmeNt in variouS tHrombotIc dIseases for better cliNical practicE (SUNSHINE) is a multicenter, prospective, observational non-interventional inpatient/outpatient disease registry to assess the utilization of Non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and associated outcomes. The SUNSHINE registry will focus on the collection and analysis of observational data in medical records from hospital information system (HIS) to evaluate the outcomes related with these NOACs when applied in extensive patient populations outside of clinical research studies. The registry will also allow for mainly combining the atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) databases. In brief, the SUNSHINE registry will provide important information on the outcomes of NOACs in routine practice and gather further information on its safety and effectiveness.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease share common risk factors and frequently coexist in the same patients. Their management requires use of antithrombotic agents: anticoagulant therapy (AC) for secondary prevention of VTE recurrence, antiplatelet (AP) for secondary prevention of major adverse ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease, lower extremity peripheral arterial disease). Side effects of antithrombotic drugs are the 1st cause of emergency admission and hospitalization for an adverse drug reaction (mainly bleeding), and the combination of AC with AP strongly increases this risk. Up to one third of VTE patients receive concomitant AP therapy, with conflicting results on patient outcomes. Concomitant therapy (AC+AP) has been associated with a higher risk of bleeding (up to 3-fold) when aspirin was associated with vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) in a multicenter cohort study, or with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for acute VTE in a post-hoc subgroup analysis. Conversely, patients with acute VTE in whom clinicians decided to maintain AC+AP were found to have an increased risk of MACCE without any higher risk of bleeding, in a multicenter registry. However, in most cases, the type (aspirin or another) and indication (primary versus secondary prevention) of AP was unknown, as was the duration of the combination AC+AP, and therefore these observational results may be confounded. Therefore, there is persistent equipoise regarding the benefit/risk of combining an antiplatelet therapy with anticoagulation in patients undergoing treatment for VTE, when there is a prior history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This may explain why clinical practice varies widely. Considering the conflicting data about the risk of bleeding in patients on AP therapy for secondary prevention, who need to start full-dose anticoagulant therapy for acute VTE, a randomized trial comparing the two strategies, in patients with acute VTE and with history of stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is needed and justified. We hypothesize that a strategy based on the prescription of a full-dose AC therapy alone will decrease the risk of bleeding, when compared to the the strategy of combined AP and full-dose AC therapies, and that this strategy will translate in a positive net clinical benefit (a composite of clinically relevant bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and major adverse ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events).