Active clinical trials for "Venous Thromboembolism"

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. The population of critically ill patients is a heterogeneous group of patients with an overall high average risk of developing VTE. No prognostic model has been developed for estimation of this risk specifically in critically ill patients. The aim is to construct and validate a risk assessment model for predicting the risk of in-hospital VTE in critically ill patients. Methods: In the first phase of the study we will create a prognostic model based on a derivation cohort of critically ill patients who were acutely admitted to the intensive care unit. A point-based clinical prediction model will be created using backward stepwise regression analysis from a selection of predefined candidate predictors. Model performance, discrimination and calibration will be evaluated, and the model will be internally validated by bootstrapping. In the second phase of the study, external validation will be performed in an independent cohort, and additionally model performance will be compared with performance of existing VTE risk prediction models derived from, and applied to, general medical patients. Dissemination: This protocol will be published online. The results will be reported according to the Transparent Reporting of multivariate prediction models for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement, and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

We hypothesize that reduced dose of enoxaparin in elderly patients will result in reduced proportion of patients with therapeutic anti Xa activity and reduced clinical efficacy.

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are the reference molecule for the long term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients but remains, however, associated with a high risk of recurrent thromboembolism. The high rate of recurrence may result from alterations in the pharmacokinetics of LMWH. The primary purpose of the study is to compare the pharmacokinetics of anti-Xa activity in patients with cancer and patients without cancer treated with curative dose of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The secondary purposes are 1/ to study the correlation between anti-Xa LMWH and concentration of plasma heparanase and 2/ to evaluate the predictive nature of the anti-Xa activity on the occurrence of thromboembolic recurrence in cancer patients treated with LMWH for VTE.

patient with liver cirrhosis was supposed to have autoanticoagulation which approved to be wrong, with absence of conventional method to detect all abnormalities in coagulation state. Thromboelastography (TEG) give a broad picture for the coagulation defects. In addition to that no guidelines prescribed anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cirrhotic, so the investigators will do a study to demonstrate frequency and risk factors for acute venous thromboembolism in cirrhotic patients, find a conventional laboratory method and test TEG to assess risk of thrombosis in cirrhotic patients.Also, to validate current algorithm for use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet for thromboembolism for non cirrhotic in cirrhotic patients.

Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitors-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. The investigators aimed at assessing whether the widely used heparin anti-Xa assay can quantify the apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux and danaparoid levels.

This is a prospective study with the following objectives: Primary Objective: To estimate the prevalence of unsuspected VTE in oncology patients on routine staging CT scans of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. Secondary Objectives: To identify symptoms commonly associated with VTE that are present in cancer patients undergoing routine staging CT scans with findings of unsuspected VTE. To identify the risk factors and demographic characteristics in outpatient cancer patients associated with the development of unsuspected VTE. To determine the incidence of recurrence of new VTE in patients with unsuspected VTE at 3 and 6 months of follow-up.

The main venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk prediction model for ambulatory cancer patients is Khorana. Cancer thrombosis is associated with elevated thrombin generation. Its quantification is a promising method for evaluating patient's thrombotic profile. This study aims to develop a predictive model of VTE risk in ambulatory cancer patients, combining thrombosis biomarkers (D-dimers and thrombin generation potential) with the Khorana score. This is a prospective observational study that includes newly diagnosed cancer patients proposed for anti-tumor treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapies). Patients with disease progression are allowed if chemotherapy-free for 3 months. A 6-month mean incidence of VTE 6-10% is expected, requiring a sample size of 600 patients. Blood sample is collected at inclusion to analyze thrombosis biomarkers and blood count. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of symptomatic or incidental VTE within 6 months of inclusion. Models will follow a logistic approach with K-fold cross-validation (k=10). Model quality will be assessed with Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Decision for entering predictors in multivariate models will be based on p <.10 in the univariate analysis.

Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma per IMWG criteria prior to therapy initiation are enrolled in the study. The aim of the study is to investigate clinical and disease related risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in these patients as well as possible biomarkers of hypercoagulability linked with the occurrence of venous thromboembolism at diagnosis and during the disease course. The purpose is to create a risk assessment model for VTE in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients and make the model more accurate by combining relevant clinical and disease characteristics with biomarkers of cellular and plasma hypercoagulability. A standardized clinical research form is completed for all patients at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 month follow up to include relevant clinical, patient-related, disease-related and treatment related data. Blood sampling also takes place at baseline and 3,6,12 months to assess multiple biomarkers of plasma and cellular hypercoagulability. In addition lowe limb ultrasound is performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint is VTE occurrence. Following the elaboration of the ROADMAP-CAT-MM risk assessment model we will prospectively validate it. We expect that patients who are classified, as high risk according to the ROADMAP-CAT-MM will experience symptomatic VTE more frequently and will have higher morbidity and mortality rates during the follow-up. The prospective validation of the ROADMAP-CAT-MM will provide guidance for the use and choice of thromboprophylaxis in these patients and will identify high risk patients eligible for thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (tinzaparin). In addition to symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma the study aims to investigate VTE risk in all plasma cell dyscrasias and will recruit patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, asymptomatic multiple myeloma, primary amyloidosis and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.

This prospective observational follow-up study is designed to assess the long-term outcomes after Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to assess the effect of the new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) rivaroxaban on the prevalence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The study will not be testing any formal hypothesis.

Arterial and venous thromboembolism represents one of the most common preventable health problems. Patients undergoing surgery, especially hip fracture surgery are at high risk for deep vein thromboembolism (VTE) without thromboprophylaxis. In the absence of prophylaxis, the incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) after Hip Fracture Surgery (HFS) is reportedly 4%-12%. Provision of thromboprophylaxis to all patients who undergo HFS is recommended.