Active clinical trials for "Respiratory Insufficiency"

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of newborn resuscitation feedback supported by a mobile health application called LIVEBORN; secondarily, to evaluate the relative effectiveness of real-time guidance vs debriefing. Participants: Newborns and Nurse midwives Procedures (methods): This is a pre-post interventional trial to evaluate the effectiveness of LIVEBORN feedback. The investigators will use a randomized design to test the relative effectiveness of two modes of feedback: real-time guidance versus debriefing. Given the potential for feedback interventions to have spillover effects, the investigators will randomize by cluster (i.e., facility) rather than by individual. The study will begin with an approximately two-month pilot phase to establish systems for implementation of recommended training and simulation practice and consistent use of LIVEBORN for observations. After these systems have been successfully established, the investigators will initiate the pre-post trial. The control phase will last six months followed by implementation of LIVEBORN feedback in an intervention phase lasting 12 months.

This study is designed to evaluate the effects of the coadministration of paroxetine or escitalopram with an opioid on ventilation. Ventilation will be assessed using a rebreathing methodology. This study will evaluate chronic and acute dosing of paroxetine and escitalopram combined with an opioid as well as chronic and acute dosing of the two drugs without coadministration of an opioid. This study is a 3-period, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study conducted with 25 healthy participants. Each participant will receive each of the 3 treatments (placebo/oxycodone, paroxetine/oxycodone, escitalopram/oxycodone) in a randomized order.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare different approaches of spinal anesthesia in pregnant females who are having cesarean section. The main aim is • Which approach is better in terms of avoiding intraoperative and post operative complications Participants will be given anesthesia by Midline approach paramedian approach Taylors approach

This randomized clinical trial studies how well non-invasive ventilation works in reducing the need for intubation, or placement of a tube in the windpipe, in patients with cancer and respiratory failure. Respiratory failure is a condition in which not enough oxygen passes from the lungs to the blood, and is a common cause of admission to the emergency room in patients with hematological and solid tumor patients. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a method of delivering oxygen using a mask. It is not yet known whether NIPPV is better at improving the amount of oxygen in the blood, reducing shortness of breath, and the need for intubation than standard high flow oxygen (a tube with 2 prongs placed in the nostrils) in patients with cancer and respiratory failure.

Detection and relief of dyspnea in mechanically ventilated patients is a priority. Optimization of mechanical ventilation settings is unfortunately often insufficient to relieve dyspnea in patients entering the weaning process. Pharmacological treatments are effective but their use is likely to delay separation with the ventilator. Promoting the development of non-pharmacological interventions is therefore an interesting avenue. The hypothesis is that the application of high-flow humidified nasal air in orotracheally intubated patients can decrease the work of breathing and relieve dyspnea at the time of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Patients will be exposed to stepwise increase in high flow nasal air (0 L/min, 30 L/min, 50 L/min and 70 L/min) before to undergo a 60 minutes spontaneous breathing trial. During the protocol, dyspnea, inspiratory effort, respiratory drive, respiratory muscles electromyogram (EMG) and patient's comfort will be assessed.

The study's aim is to ascertain the best approach for providing sedation and pain management for patients who have sustained trauma and are requiring respiratory support from a mechanical ventilator. The common approach to patients who need mechanical ventilation is to provide continuous drips of sedatives and pain medicine and awaken the patient once a day to check the brain functions. Another approach is to provide pain medicine and reserve sedatives for only a short duration when needed. The difference between approaches has not been studied in Trauma patients.

Introduction: Patients on mechanical ventilation suffer alterations in the viscoelastic characteristics of the mucus due to changes in the humidity and temperature of the inhaled air and in the respiratory volumes and flows. The literature has pointed out the use of mechanical ventilators as a tool for mobilizing secretions and closed-system aspiration associated with expiratory pause has been shown to be effective in mobilizing secretions. Objectives: To assess whether there is a difference in the mass of aspirated secretion with the application of the expiratory pause during aspiration. Methods: A crossover, randomized study. Applied to children aged 0 to 5 years and 11 months who are intubated for 24 hours with orotracheal tubes or tracheostomy. There will be an exclusion of patients who present with undrained pneumothorax, cranial hypertension or any other clinical situation that has a clinical contraindication to aspiration and patients whose parents do not agree to participate in the study. The technique will be during aspiration in the tube with where to apply or not the expiratory pause on the mechanical ventilator. This secretion will be weighed so that there is fidelity in the results.

The purpose of this study is to compare the exercise capacity between high SpO2 (Minimum SpO2 94-96%) value during pulmonary rehabilitation and low SpO2 (Minimum SpO2 84-86%) value during pulmonary rehabilitation for the patients with chronic respiratory failure receiving long-term oxygen therapy.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of helmet NIV in reducing the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in order to minimize ventilator needs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The investigators hypothesize that a simple 3-point tracking device that uses motion sensors attached to the abdomen and chest of a child will provide information regarding thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA), a major component of respiratory distress, and ultimately help guide a clinician to initiate, escalate, de-escalate, or stop respiratory support interventions. AIMS To determine if the TAA-monitoring device can be used to detect differences in respiratory synchrony in a manner that is clinically applicable. The investigators hope that the device will detect 1) major asynchrony events in a timely manner so as to prompt clinician intervention during future use; and 2) asynchrony events that may be less visible to the naked eye that may be precursors to more severe events.