Active clinical trials for "Ventricular Dysfunction"

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is an independent factor of mortality for many pulmonary diseases. Currently, RVF is defined as the incapacity of the RV to maintain the flow without dilating to use the Frank-Starling law (i.e., increase of the ejection volume associated to an increase of the preload). RVF is associated to RV systolic dysfunction which is conventionally defined as a decrease of the RV ejection fraction (RVEF) < 45%. In the intensive care unit (ICU), acute RVF is mainly due to the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis or septic shock, and less often to severe pulmonary embolism or RV infarction. The anatomical complexity of the RV precludes any geometrical assumption to estimate its volume, hence its ejection fraction (EF) using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. For this reason, the evaluation of RV systolic function is currently based on parameters used as surrogates of RVEF: fraction area change in 2D-mode, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in M-mode, and maximal velocity of the systolic S' wave using tissue Doppler imaging. Real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography now enables accurate on-line measurement of RV volume and provides at the bedside the non-invasive assessment of RVEF. 3D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been validated to measure RV volume and RVEF compared to MRI which is the gold standard. However, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has not yet been validated in this specific clinical setting, while 2D TEE is frequently used in ICU in ventilated and sedated patients. Accordingly, the diagnostic ability of 3D echocardiography to quantify RV systolic function in ICU patients with RVF of any origin is currently unknown.

The aim of this registry will be to compare the pathophysiological response of the morphology and function of the right heart and pulmonary circulation assessed with resting and stress-echocardiography in patients with various cardiovascular diseases, to compare them to healthy individuals. The physiological response in healthy individuals as well as elite athletes, defined as athletes participating at national and international competitions, will also be evaluated. Patients will be enrolled both prospectively as well as retrospectively and the will be evaluated by resting and stress echocardiography, which are part of the routine clinical practice. All clinical outcome measures will be collected as part of routine examinations. The measurements will include systolic and diastolic pump function of the right and left ventricles and other echocardiographic parameters. Moreover, a comparison of these parameters among different groups will be performed. Other optional assessments will include: exercise capacity assessed with 6-minute walking distance, World Health Organization functional class (WHO functional class), peak oxygen uptake assessed by spiroergometry. Patients will be evaluated at baseline and each year with the aforementioned procedures according to the sites clinical routine.

Three-dimensional echocardiography has become a gold standard to assess right ventricular (RV) function, and investigators plan to use 3D transesophageal echocardiography to assess RV function in 3 types of aortic valve replacement (AVR): surgical AVR (SAVR), mini-sternotomy AVR (mini AVR), and transcatheter AVR (TAVR).

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is one of the strongest predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the gold standard for LVEF measurement. Currently, LVEF can be estimated at the time of the coronary angiogram but requires a ventriculography. This latter is performed at the price of an increased amount of contrast media injected and puts the patients at risk for mechanical complications, ventricular arrhythmia or atrio-ventricular blocks. Artificial intelligence (AI) has previously been shown to be an accurate method for determining LVEF using different data sources. Fur the purpose of this study, we aim at validating prospectively an AI algorithm, called CathEF, for the prediction of real-time LVEF (AI-LVEF) compared to TTE-LVEF and ventriculography in patients undergoing coronary angiogram for ACS.

This study will include the placement of a pressure volume (PV) loop catheter in the right atrium of patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement and measure relevant PV loop data. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery (PA) catheter parameters as comparators to the PV loop will be recorded.

RV dysfunction has been associated with increased mortality in the ICU and cardiac surgical patients. Thus, early identification of RV dysfunction at less severe stages will allow for earlier intervention and potentially better patient outcomes. However, so far, no studies have reported prospectively the prevalence of abnormal RV pressure waveform during cardiac surgery and in the ICU. The investigator's primary hypothesis is that the prevalence of abnormal RV pressure waveform occurs in more than 50% of cardiac surgical patients throughout their hospitalization. Those patients with abnormal RV pressure waveform will be more prone to post-operative complications related to RV dysfunction and failure in the OR and ICU.

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting up tp 30% will develop postoperative right ventricle dysfunction. Its imperative for the physician to fully understand the severity of this complication in order to perform an early diagnosis and carry out the appropriate treatment. Aim: Investigate the correlation between echocardiographic measurements and hemodynamic changes at different time points in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery Hypothesis: Weak correlation between echocardiographic measurements and hemodynamic changes during coronary artery bypass graft surgery Echocardiographic measurements would change across different time points during surgery independent of hemodynamic values.

Advances in surgical and medical care have led to improved outcomes in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). As a consequence, the majority of patients nowadays survives to adulthood (adults with CHD, that is, adult CHD [ACHD]) with good quality of life. Despite the surgical success, the morbidity and mortality of ACHD is higher than in the general population and is linked to the development of heart failure (HF) in adulthood. HF occurs in approximately 25% of patients with ACHD, even in those patients in whom the congenital mal-formation has been corrected successfully in childhood. The time course and presentation are heterogeneous owing to variable congenital malformation and limitation of treatment options. ACHD with an anatomic right ventricle as the systemic ventricle (e.g., atrial switch operation in patients with transposition of the great arteries [TGAs]) and those with a functional single ventricle (e.g., Fontan circulation) appear to be at higher risk of developing HF. Young age at initial corrective surgery-often in the first 2 years of life-and lack of specific medical therapies can contribute to a high and early demand for heart transplantation in patients with ACHD.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) guided lead placement improves clinical outcomes for patients needing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to traditional posterolateral left ventricular lead placement.

Chronic heart failure represents an extremely complex clinical syndrome, defined as the inability of the heart muscle to generate a volume adequate to the metabolic needs of peripheral tissues, or to do so only in the face of high filling pressures intracavity. Heart failure is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in Western countries. Despite advances in the therapeutic field, the prognosis of patients with heart failure of ischemic and non-ischaemic aetiology still remains unfavorable, with a mortality rate of 50% 5 years after the first hospitalization.Therefore, a deeper understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in heart failure and adverse ventricular remodeling is essential.