Active clinical trials for "Tachycardia, Ventricular"

This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center clinical case series evaluating the outcomes of the magnetic navigation system in ventricular tachycardia (VT) cases. Subjects will be evaluated acutely and will be followed clinically at 1, 6 and 12 months post-treatment.

This study will compare aggressive antiarrhythmic therapy to catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients who have suffered prior myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the optimal management of patients presenting with recurrent VT and receiving ICD therapy in spite of first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The hypothesis is catheter ablation is superior to aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy for recurrent VT.

Background: Patient's freedom from VT after RFA remains non-optimal and it depends on many factors. One of them is the effective reduction of the myocardium with RF energy during the operation. The standardization of the parameters of RF will help to increase the success of the procedure. Hypothesis: Radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardias with high power parameters has comparable safety and leads to greater efficacy (absence of ventricular tachycardias and all types of cardioverter-defibrillator therapies) in the long-term compared with ablation with standard parameters in patients with structural heart disease. Purpose: to evaluate the safety and the efficiency of ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using high power RF energy.

The hypothesis of MAP IN HEART is that catheter ablation for post-infarction ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be largely improved through a direct definition of primary ablation targets from pre-operative CT scan imaging. The objective of is to demonstrate that catheter ablation of post-infarction VT targeting left ventricular wall thickness channels as defined from CT scan is feasible and associated with favorable efficacy, efficiency and safety profiles. A single-arm prospective cohort study will be conducted, including 40 patients over 3 European centres. Baseline, procedural and 6-month follow-up data will be analyzed

People who suffer from incessant cardiac arrhythmias receive a small electrical device implanted into their chest that automatically senses when the heart beats arrhythmically and applies electrical pulse to re-establish normal activity. However, if problems persist, people can have an operation called catheter ablation therapy, which involves 'burning' small areas of the heart tissue in order to permanently disrupt the problematic electrical pathways driving these arrhythmias. However, procedure times and complication rates are high, whist success rates are punitively low (~50% success), largely due to the significant challenge clinicians face in identifying the ideal 'target' to ablate within the patient's heart. In this project, the investigators aim to develop, and clinically validate, an in silico tool that reconstructs a personalised computational model of a patient's heart using advanced MRI data, upon which a virtual 'mapping' procedure is then performed in order to identify (in the model) the optimal ablation target. This pre-procedural planning tool utilises stored information about the patient's specific arrhythmia from their implanted device, ensuring optimal targets are selected. The approach aims to reduce procedure times whilst increasing their safety, and ensure significantly increased long-term effectiveness of these invasive ablation procedures, increasing survival rates and quality-of-life. This study is concerned with the clinical arm of the study, specifically, in the collection of data from patients in order to (retrospectively) validate the computational model. The model itself will not be applied or used to treat these patients.

The objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RSDN) in the primary prevention of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with ischemic or non-ischemic ventricular dysfunction, who are to receive an ICD for either i) secondary prevention, or ii) primary prevention + inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) by programmed ventricular stimulation at the time of ICD implantation. These patients will be randomized to ICD alone or ICD + RSDN.

In this study, we are comparing the difference in outcomes between patients who were given shocks to the heart, during the upstroke of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and before CPR is started. The study population will be all cardiac arrest patients attended by the staff of the Emergency Department who fulfil the eligibility criteria. Patients will be managed according to currently approved cardiac arrest protocols. Patients confirmed in cardiac arrest have manual chest compressions started while mechanical CPR (whereby chest compressions are delivered by an automated device) is prepared. Mechanical CPR should be started as soon as possible (<1 minute). If patients are eligible to be shocked, they will receive shocks either during upstroke of CPR or before CPR is started. Thus the purpose of this study is to answer the question whether are there improvement in survival between when shocks are given during upstroke and before CPR is started.

Determine effects of remifentanil conscious sedation in patients undergoing Electrophysiological (EP) studies for the ablation of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia and/or persistent frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) of non-ischemic origin

The goal of APART is the assessment of the therapeutic and preventive stimulation algorithms of the Medtronic AT500 and following devices in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias and an indication for cardiac pacing according to the German guidelines. Medication is controlled throughout the study with a beta-blocker as the only antiarrhythmic drug.

This clinical trial is a multi center, prospective, randomized, parallel study designed to compare septal to apical ICD lead placement.