Active clinical trials for "Vitreous Hemorrhage"

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of pre- and intra-operative bevacizumab injection on postoperative vitreous hemorrhage after diabetic vitrectomy.

The purpose of this study is to determine if intravitreal injection of Vitrase (ovine hyaluronidase) clears vitreous hemorrhage

To evaluate the ocular and systemic safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection in patients undergoing Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

We hypothesized that to reduce the adverse effects of intravitreal bevacizumab on ocular tissue and whole body, intravitreal injection of a low concentration of bevacizumab and conducting vitrectomy shortly after the injection is useful. In the present prospective, double-masked, randomized, controlled study, we aimed to verify the usefulness of intravitreal injection of 0.16 mg/0.05 ml bevacizumab one day before conducting vitrectomy for PDR.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab is effective in reducing intra-operative and postoperative bleeding in diabetic patients submitted to pars plana vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage.

Prospective study comparing efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection and panretinal photocoagulation to early vitrectomy for patients with diabetic vitreous hemorrhage.

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab injections for treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with new dense vitreous hemorrhage (VH) after previous full panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).

Although vitreous hemorrhage (VH) from proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) can cause acute and dramatic vision loss for patients with diabetes, there is no current, evidence-based clinical guidance as to what treatment method is most likely to provide the best visual outcomes once intervention is desired. Intravitreous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy alone or vitrectomy combined with intraoperative PRP each provide the opportunity to stabilize or regress retinal neovascularization. However, clinical trials are lacking to elucidate the relative time frame of visual recovery or final visual outcome in prompt vitrectomy compared with initial anti-VEGF treatment. The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol N demonstrated short-term trends consistent with a possible beneficial effect of anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with VH from PDR, including greater visual acuity improvement and reduced rates of recurrent VH as compared with saline injection. It is possible that a study with a longer duration of follow-up with structured anti-VEGF retreatment would demonstrate even greater effectiveness of anti-VEGF for VH to avoid vitrectomy and its attendant adverse events while also improving visual acuity. On the other hand, advances in surgical techniques leading to faster operative times, quicker patient recovery, and reduced complication rates may make prompt vitrectomy a more attractive alternative since it results in the immediate ability to clear hemorrhage and to perform PRP if desired, often as part of one procedure. This proposed study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of two treatment approaches for eyes with VH from PDR: prompt vitrectomy + PRP and intravitreous aflibercept injections.

This study will enrol patients with diabetes who have already elected to undergo pars plana vitrectomy (eye surgery) to remove persistent vitreous haemorrhage (a complication of severe diabetic eye disease in which blood fills the inner cavity of the eye, obscuring the vision and preventing treatment to stop the bleeding). Those in the treatment arm will have an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (Lucentis) at the same dose used for the treatment of neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (a disease that has some features in common with diabetic eye disease). It is hypothesised that this will promote clearance of the vitreous haemorrhage and that this, in turn, may mean that some patients do not need to proceed to vitrectomy.

As technology advances, vitrectomy cutters are smaller and cut rates have become faster. In this prospective study, the vitrectomy efficiency and safety between 5,000 cuts per minute with 10,000 cuts per minute are compared