Active clinical trials for "Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis"

The purpose of this study is to investigate, after achievement of remission, the efficacy of rituximab compared with azathioprine maintenance therapy on duration of remission, in patients with relapsing or newly-diagnosed Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis EPGA receiving standard of care therapy including glucocorticoid therapy reduction/withdrawal.

The trial was designed as a single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose parallel controlled phase I study to evaluate the similarity of pharmacokinetics and safety of Meperizumab injection and NUCALA® in healthy male volunteers. The plan is to enroll 88 healthy subjects. After signing the written informed consent voluntarily, the subjects will undergo a series of examinations and information collection to determine whether they meet the inclusion criteria. The qualified subjects will be randomized and administered. Biological samples were collected and safety checked before and after administration according to protocol requirements. Adverse events occurred during the trial were collected, and the combination of drug use and non-drug treatment were asked and recorded in detail. When the 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratio of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of Meperizumab injection and NUCALA® was within the range of 80.00%-125.00%, it was proved that the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the two were similar.

Childhood chronic vasculitis describes a group of rare life-threatening diseases that have in common inflammation of blood vessels in vital organs such as kidneys, lungs and brain. Most knowledge about them comes from adult patients. Severe disease requires aggressive life-saving treatments with steroids and some cancer drugs which can themselves cause damage, and increase risks of cancer and severe infections. Conversely, milder disease can be treated with less toxic drugs. Different classification and "scoring tools" are used to define the types and severity of vasculitis and to measure damage caused by disease or drugs. These in turn help direct how aggressively to treat a patient and to measure outcome. None of these tools however have been assessed in children and the best balance of disease and treatment risks against outcome for children is not known. Although causes of these diseases in children and adults are probably the same, the effects of the disease and the response (good and bad) to drugs will differ in growing children. Because specialists may see only one new child with vasculitis each year, obtaining enough information to learn about childhood vasculitis requires cooperation. We will use an international web-based registry to which doctors from 50 or more centers can contribute patient data. We will determine the features which help better classify and diagnose children compared to adults. Through the web we will collect and analyze information on patients similarly classified and "scored" so that most successful treatments can be identified. Children with vasculitis are less likely to have diseases associated with aging, alcohol and smoking etc., and therefore may be a better group in whom to study the underlying biology of vasculitis. We will use this opportunity and collect spit, blood and tissue from registry patients for laboratory study with an aim to find biomarkers to better classify, define and direct optimal treatment and outcomes.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA; Wegener's) is a multi-organ autoimmune disease characterized by necrotizing granulomatous inflammation and vasculitis. Upper respiratory involvement occurs in up to 90% of patients with GPA and is often the first manifestation of the disease. Patients with upper respiratory tract disease are more at risk of local and systemic relapse. Microbial organisms may be involved in inducing disease activity in GPA. Previous culture-dependent studies found that patients with GPA were more likely to be chronic nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus compared to non-GPA chronic rhinosinusitis and healthy controls; additionally, GPA patients with S. aureus colonization are more likely to experience a future relapse. This led to a randomized placebo-controlled trial of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) which showed this antibiotic/antifungal was effective in preventing relapse in GPA. Whether the benefits of TMP-SMX are related to its antimicrobial properties versus anti-inflammatory effects is still unknown. The objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate the changes in the nasal microbiome, mycobiome, and host immunity in patients with GPA before, during, and after receipt of TMP-SMX for 4 weeks. The target enrollment number is 30 participants, and the investigators will include patients seen at the Penn Vasculitis Center with GPA (diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria or based on investigator's judgment). To analyze nasal microbiome and host immunity, participants will be swabbed with nasal swab and cytobrush for DNA sequencing and other studies. An optional research blood draw is also included. The investigators and coordinators will follow each patient longitudinally over a 6-month period.

This study is a phase 2/3 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHR-1703 in patients with EGPA.

This study will enroll male and female subjects who are 18 years of age or older with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.

Procalcitonin is a protein consisting of 116 amino-acids which can rapidly rise under inflammatory conditions and sepsis. More than 20 years ago it has been shown that dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) cleaves procalcitonin from the n-terminus, resulting in a truncated procalcitonin-variant which consists of 114 aminoacids. Within our workgroup we found that the truncated procalcitonin-variant had deleterious effects on vascular integrity during sepsis in mice. However, it is unknown if this applies also in humans. By using an ELISA-assay we want to examine the ratio between native and truncated human procalcitonin during diseases accompanied with hyperprocalcitoninemia and correlate the results with clinical data.

The purpose of this study is to identify the most promising therapeutic strategy for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and inadequate response to standard of care therapy. It will evaluate the efficacy to induce remission of three different salvage strategies including: a combination of rituximab with addition of a conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (either methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, but preferentially methotrexate); tocilizumab; or abatacept.

The purpose of this study is to identify genes that increase the risk of developing vasculitis, a group of severe diseases that feature inflammation of blood vessels. Results of these studies will provide vasculitis researchers with insight into the causes of these diseases and generate new ideas for diagnostic tests and therapies, and will be of great interest to the larger communities of researchers investigating vasculitis and other autoimmune, inflammatory, and vascular diseases.

The goal of this multicentre observational study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars to the originator in Canadian patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA), two main forms of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in vasculitis control between originator and biosimilar rituximab? Is there a difference in adverse effects between originator and biosimilar rituximab? In the Canadian healthcare context, are wait times to receive approval (financial coverage) for rituximab shorter for biosimilars compared to originators? Investigators will perform study assessments (including recording disease activity, damage, and adverse events) at the time of participants' usual clinical care visits, at regular intervals for 2 years after starting rituximab (for induction or maintenance treatment) or switching from an originator to a biosimilar as part of their usual care. Researchers will compare outcomes among participants who have received rituximab originators (from 2018 onwards) or biosimilars as part of their usual care, to see if there are differences in relapses, remission rates, damage, serious infections, serious adverse events, and treatment approval wait times.