Active clinical trials for "Wet Macular Degeneration"

This study will examine the use of Aflibercept in patients with exudative macular degeneration requiring intravitreal injections. Patients will be followed for 24 months. The follow up phase will be completed at month 36.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a treatment effect of ESBA1008 applied as a microvolume injection or infusion on retinal function and morphology in subjects with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

The primary objective is to assess long-term safety and tolerability of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI; EYLEA®; BAY86-5321) in patients with neovascular AMD.

The purpose of this study is to compare brolucizumab (RTH258) ophthalmic solution for intravitreal (IVT) injection (6 mg) to aflibercept ophthalmic solution for IVT injection (2 mg) in subjects with untreated active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye.

Clinical and genetic evaluation of individuals treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection (Eylea) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD)

The purpose of this study was to collect ECG data after a single IVT injection of brolucizumab 6 mg in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Patients with neovascular Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and the particular feature of pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) were not studied in the Phase III trials for ranibizumab (Lucentis). The PrONTO study was the first ranibizumab study to enroll such patients but only treated with ranibizumab until fluid within the layers of the retina was absent, not until the entire PED was absent. This study hypothesizes that there may be a difference in benefit between patients treated until just the retinal edema is gone and those in which the retinal edema and PED are both gone.

Aflibercept (EYLEA®) induces a rapid reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT) for patients suffering from neovascular age-related-macular degeneration.1 This early dramatic reduction in CRT is already observed through week 4. Therefore it might be not necessary to consistently perform each of the three monthly consecutive intravitreal injections of the so-called loading phase.

Visual outcomes using monthly ranibizumab therapy are well established in clinical trials, but the best way to assess when and how to treat patients with PRN therapy has not been proven. Information is lacking on Multi-focal ERG and microperimetry outcomes with ranibizumab therapy. Additionally, VA and OCT outcomes don't always correlate and other assessments such as the Multi-focal ERG and microperimetry may be useful as early predictors of when patients should be retreated. This study will assess 2 groups (monthly and PRN therapy) and assess high resolution OCT, microperimetry, and Multi-focal ERG outcomes. For the PRN group retreatment will be based on OCT criteria. We will investigate if microperimetry or multifocal ERG would have been an early predictor of fluid recurrence.

A multicentre, randomised, parallel group, sham-controlled, double-masked, dose-ranging study, investigating two doses of OPT-302 in combination with ranibizumab compared with ranibizumab with sham, over six consecutive monthly dosing cycles in participants with neovascular (wet) AMD.