Active clinical trials for "Wet Macular Degeneration"

This is a Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, single- and multi-dose, dose-escalating study of OLX10212 in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study is composed of 2 parts: Part A and Part B. Part A is a single ascending dose study, and Part B is a multiple ascending dose study. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single and multiple intravitreal injection(s) of OLX10212 in patients with neovascular AMD. The exploratory objectives are to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of single and multiple intravitreal injection(s) of OLX10212 in patients with neovascular AMD, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and multiple intravitreal injection(s) of OLX10212 in patients with neovascular AMD.

The purpose of the Phase 1 study is comprised of single ascending-dose component (Part 1) and multiple ascending-dose component (Part 2) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of ASKG712 in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

The purpose of this Phase 1 study is comprised of multiple ascending-dose component (Part 1) and high concentration component (Part 2) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AM712 in patients with neovascular age- related macular degeneration (nAMD).

The purpose of this study is to compare two different treatment protocols for wet macular degeneration; the new protocol called "Observe and Plan" against the current standard protocol "Treat and Extend". Studies suggest that patients achieve equally good visual acuity with fewer controls and that they are more satisfied with the new protocol.

The centre of the retina (macula) at the back of the eye contains cells that give us our central vision that we use for reading and recognising faces. These cells can be damaged by a disease called wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), where new abnormal blood vessels grow through the macula and leak fluid. This can affect vision. In some cases, wet AMD can also cause a bleed under the macula, known as a submacular haemorrhage (SMH), which can lead to marked and persistent loss of vision in the eye. The current standard treatment for wet AMD is to give injections containing 'anti-VEGF' drugs into the eye. Anti-VEGF drugs reduce the leakage of fluid so that the macula can become dry again and sight can improve. Anti-VEGFs are also the current standard of care for SMH, mainly because there is no licensed treatment for the SMH itself (patients with SMH were excluded from most wet AMD studies). The purpose of this study therefore is to compare two treatments: Standard treatment for wet AMD (anti-VEGF injections). Standard treatment above plus surgery. This study will find out if having surgery alongside anti-VEGF injections can improve vision further over the current standard treatment of anti-VEGF injections alone.

The study investigates whether patients treated for neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (AMD), with intravitreal injection with bevacizumab (Avastin) after two years need more injections with retained therapy response compared to patients being treated with intravitreal injection with aflibercept (Eylea). The study also aims to evaluate if there is a difference in best-corrected visual acuity, macular thickness, recurrence interval, durability, cost efficiency, as well as vision-related quality of life.

To compare brolucizumab to aflibercept in Chinese patients with untreated active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

This is a prospective study. Data from patients diagnosed with nAMD who have never received related treatment were collected. Treatment was an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept using modified "T&E" treatment plans. After three months of monthly intravitreal injections, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the degree of adjustment of the injection interval was divided into two weeks and four weeks. Unlike the ALTAIR study, we cancel the maintenance criteria of classical T&E regimens. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), last injection interval, and the number of injections were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to evaluate treatment efficacy.

This is a prospective, observational study designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of RGX-314. Eligible participants are those who were previously enrolled in a clinical study in which they received a single subretinal administration of RGX-314 in their study eye. Enrollment of each participant in the current study should occur after the participant has completed either the end of study or early termination visit in the previous (parent) clinical study. Participants will be followed for up to 5 years post-RGX-314 administration (inclusive of the parent study). After enrollment and a 6-month follow-up visit, participants will attend at least annual study visits through the end of the 5-year post-RGX-314 administration follow-up period. Additionally, an interventional fellow eye treatment substudy will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of subretinal RGX-314 administration in the fellow eye of participants having bilateral disease who previously received a subretinal injection of RGX-314 in their study eye. Participants who qualify for the substudy will receive subretinal administration of RGX-314 in their fellow eye and complete 13 study visits in a 54-week period. Following completion of the substudy participants will continue in the observational portion of the study for up to 5 years post RGX-314 administration in their fellow eye.

A pilot study for Associations between the oral and intestinal microbiome and neovascular age-related macular degeneration and the investigation on the effect of oral probiotics as a treatment The investigators recruit the neovascular AMD patients and control patients. 15 neovascular AMD patients with anti-VEGF treatment and oral probiotics supplement 15 neovascular AMD patients with anti-VEGF treatment and no oral probiotics supplement 15 control patients and no oral probiotics supplement The investigators will collect stool, blood, and saliva sample at the baseline and 6 months, and analyze the oral and intestinal microbiome changes.