Active clinical trials for "Wound Infection"

Postoperative pain and time taken to return to normal activities after laparoscopic surgery are significantly shorter. Wound infections still occur and contribute to prolonged hospital stays and morbidity. Typically, port incision sites are covered with a standard dressing (approximating strips and a gauze). Although the umbilical wound infection rate in laparoscopic surgery is considered to be low, a recent study by Muensterer and Keijzer showed that the umbilical wound infection rate after single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children is approximately 7%. In the same retrospective study, the investigators demonstrated that a simple low cost vacuum dressing can significantly reduce the infection rate. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to determine if the simple vacuum dressing is superior to a standard dressing in reducing laparoscopic postoperative umbilical wound infections. All patients under 17 years of age undergoing a laparoscopic operation in the Children's Hospital will be randomized to a standard postoperative dressing or a standard postoperative dressing with vacuum applied to it. The vacuum will be applied with a 22g needle on a 10ml syringe passed percutaneously from outside the dressing into the gauze and the air around the gauze is evacuated. The umbilical wounds will be evaluated 8-10 days postoperatively in the clinical research unit of the Manitoba Institute of Child Heath according to a standardized and validated wound evaluation tool from the Canadian Center for Disease Control. Primary outcome measure in this study is postoperative wound infection. A sample size calculation using the retrospective data demonstrated that the investigators need 275 patients in each group for the Chi-squared test to have an 80% chance of detecting a difference in wound infection rate of 6% at the 5% level of significance. Based on the annual number of laparoscopic operations in the Children's Hospital (around 400) the investigators anticipate completing the inclusion of patients within a two-year period.

Surgical site complications generate a series of consequences that prolong hospital stay, increase interventions and procedures, and consequently considerably increase healthcare costs. Hence, the importance of studying measures to reduce these complications and the most feared of them is surgical site infection. The objective of the study is to analyze the complications of the surgical site in a group of participante with risk factors for developing them after undergone abdominal surgery in the period described.

The purpose of this study is to compare wound infection rates between negative pressure therapy (Prevena) and the traditional sterile dry dressing among patients undergoing vascular surgery involving groin incisions.

to compare infection rate stoma reversal skin wound after primary or secondary closure

Wound infections are a frequent complication in abdominal surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the antiseptic solution 0.04 % polyhexanide (serasept) may reduce occurrence of postoperative wound infections compared to NaCL (saline) solution in a prospective randomized setting.

Patients are often counseled to keep a surgical wound dry for 2 to 3 days. The rationale is likely to decrease the risk of infection and bleeding. However, this has never been formally studied. Patient's routines are likely disrupted when they are asked to avoid wetting the area. The investigators will perform a controlled study to determine if avoidance of post-operative wetting is necessary.

The objective of the study is reduction of the incidence of the most frequent complication of abdominal surgery, incisional hernia. In this multi center double-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial, in which a new suture technique using small bites is compared with the traditionally applied large bites (mass closure) technique for midline incisions.

This study is designed to compare the infection rates in wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline to those irrigated with chlorinated tap water. The hypothesis is that the wound infection rate subsequent to irrigation with tap water is not significantly different than the infection rate for wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline. Inclusion criteria are patients older than 1-year of age who present to the emergency department with a soft-tissue laceration requiring repair. Exclusion criteria include patients with any underlying immunocompromising illness, current use of antibiotics, puncture or bite wounds, underlying tendon or bone involvement, or wounds more than nine hours old. Patients are randomized to have their wounds irrigated either with tap water or sterile normal saline prior to closure, controlling for the volume and irrigation method used. Structured follow-up is completed at 48 hours and 30 days to determine the presence of infection. The primary outcome measure is the difference in wound infection rates between the two randomized groups.

This will be an open label pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Women undergoing cesarean delivery will be randomized to have standard wound dressing care or chlorohexidine gluconate (CHG) impregnated wound dressing (ReliaTect™ Post-Op Dressing).

The aim of this research project is to compare electrocautery to scalpel for laparotomy skin incisions, with the following objectives: To investigate whether electrocautery produces a cosmetically inferior surgical scar. To compare the rates of wound infection with each technique. To determine if electrocautery results in less postoperative pain. Our null hypothesis is that electrocautery is equivalent to scalpel for creating skin incisions; with respect to wound cosmesis, wound infection rate, and post-operative pain.