
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Four Week Plus N-Acetyl Cysteine in Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis...
Alcoholic HepatitisAlcoholic hepatitis is related to very high mortality rate. About 40% of the patients died within first 6 months after the detection of the clinical syndrome. Therefore, it is very essential for proper diagnosis and early treatment . In response to acute or chronic liver damage, bone marrow derived stem cells can spontaneously populate liver and differentiate into hepatic cells. Animal and human studies suggested that injured hepatocyte may be replaced by pluripotent bone marrow cells. However, this hepatocyte repopulation is highly dependent on varieties of liver injury and therapeutic conditions. The studies have suggested Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) can regenerate hepatocyte by fusing with hematopoietic cells, thereby enhancing the liver histology and survival rate. G-CSF is a cytokine capable to regulate a number of functions in neutrophils. In three recent studies mobilization of bone marrow stem cells induced by G-CSF was observed in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. In two of these studies there was a survival benefit with the use of G-CSF. Alcoholism leads to decrease in endogenous antioxidant potential. Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) patients show low endogenous antioxidants. Chronic ethanol consumption cause selective deficiency in the availability of reduced glutathione (GSH) in mitochondria has been reported. This is due to impaired functioning of GSH transporter from cytosol to mitochondrial matrix. The effect on glutathione replenishing potential by N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) can be used to reduce oxidative stress, which also has excellent safety profile. Therefore, NAC can be used for severe alcoholic hepatitis treatment due to its therapeutic potential factor. NAC also inhibit apoptosis and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. In a study high doses of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine therapy for 14 days conferred neither survival benefits nor early biological improvement in severe acute alcoholic hepatitis patients with adequate nutritional support.However, these results must be viewed with caution, since the study suffered from a lack of power. In a recent study, NAC and corticosteroids combination therapy benefits among patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis in 1 month survival, although the final outcome at 6 month survival was not improved. There are no studies on the use of combination therapy of 4 weeks of NAC plus G-CSF in patient with severe alcoholic hepatitis. Therefore the investigators plan to study the safety and efficacy of combination therapy of G-CSF and 4 weeks of NAC in the patients with alcoholic hepatitis.

Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection by Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Naïve Children
Hepatitis CChronicChronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents a crucial health problem in children that greatly influence their quality of life. Many efforts have been directed toward the investment of effective drugs with high safety profiles and with oral administration for better compliance. The development of a new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) made it possible to achieve these goals.

Screening, Treatment, and Eradication of Hep C
Hepatitis C Virus InfectionThe aim of this study is to assess the HCV screening rate in Arizona by identification of potential HCV patients/subjects through different methods of communication - text message, email, social media, radio, newspaper ads, and flyers.

A Study of Faldaprevir, Ribavirin and TD-6450 in Participants With Genotype 4 Hepatitis C Virus...
Hepatitis C Viral InfectionChronic Hepatitis C2 morePhase 2a study designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Faldaprevir and TD-6450 in combination with Ribavirin for a 12-week treatment duration in treatment-naïve participants with genotype 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

REP 2139-Mg and REP 2165-Mg Combination Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Infection
Chronic Hepatitis BNAPs have been previously shown to clear serum hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) both preclinically (in duck HBV infected ducks) and in human patients. REP 2139-Ca mediated HBsAg clearance acts synergistically with immunotherapeutic agent pegylated interferon-alpha 2a to restore host immunological control of HBV infection. REP 2165 is a version of REP 2139 which has been shown preclinically to retain antiviral activity with lower accumulation in the liver. Both REP 2139 and REP 2165 used in this protocol are formulated as magnesium chelate complexes, which improve their administration tolerability. This open label, randomized and controlled study will examine the safety and efficacy of REP 2139-Mg and REP 2165-Mg therapy in patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B when used in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and pegylated interferon alpha-2a.

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-493/ABT-530 in Adult Post-Liver or Post-Renal...
Chronic Hepatitis CHCV1 moreThe purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of treatment of ABT-493/ABT-530 (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) in adults who are post primary orthotopic liver or renal transplant with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

Treatment of Recently Acquired Hepatitis C With the 3D Regimen or G/P
Hepatitis CAcuteAn open label, multicentre, international pilot study of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir with or without ribavirin or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for people with recently acquired hepatitis C virus infection with or without HIV co-infection.

The Efficacy and Safety of ABT-493/ABT-530 in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4,...
Hepatitis C VirusThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of response to treatment by evaluating the percentage of subjects achieving a 12-week sustained virologic response (SVR12) after 12 weeks of treatment with ABT-493/ABT-530 and to evaluate the safety of the regimen in participants with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 4, 5, or 6 infection.

Treatment of Chronic Delta Hepatitis With Lonafarnib and Ritonavir
Hepatitis DBackground: - Chronic hepatitis D is a liver disease caused by the hepatitis D virus (HDV). It can be severe and progressive. Most people with hepatitis D will develop scarring and damage to the liver. There is no FDA approved drug to treat chronic hepatitis D. Researchers want to know if the drugs lonafarnib and ritonavir can help people with chronic hepatitis D. Objective: - To find out if treatment of hepatitis D with lonafarnib and ritonavir is safe and effective. Eligibility: - People 18 years of age and older with chronic hepatitis D. They must not have HIV or other major illnesses. Design: Participants will be screened with medical history, physical exams, and blood tests. Participants will have 24 weeks of treatment. They will then have 24 weeks of follow-up. Participants will be in 1 of 6 treatment groups. Those in each group will receive different doses of the study drugs. Some groups will start with placebo but will receive treatment after 3 months of placebo. Participants will also take drugs to treat hepatitis B. Participants will have many visits. These will include: One three-day stay at the Clinical Center Physical exams EKG: small sticky patches will be put on the chest, arms, and legs to trace heart rhythm Ultrasounds of the abdomen Urine and blood tests Stool samples Eye exams Evaluations by a reproductive endocrinologist (women) or urologist (men). Men may provide a sperm sample (optional).

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daclatasvir/Sofosbuvir/Ribavirin for 16 Versus 24 Weeks...
Hepatitis CCirrhosisThis is a randomized, open label, single center safety and efficacy study. At least 40 cirrhotic subjects with HCV genotype 3 will receive standard of care treatment of sofosbuvir and ribavirin (SOF/RBV) as well as 60 mg daily of Daclatasvir (investigational product). Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 to receive either: Group A: 16 weeks of DCV/SOF/RBV Group B: 24 weeks of DCV/SOF/RBV Subjects will return to the study center at various time points throughout the 16 or 24 weeks of treatment in addition to 12 weeks post taking last dose of study drug to monitor safety and efficacy. These visits will be according to standard of care.