search
Back to results

MINERVA: MINimizE Right Ventricular Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Congestive

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pacemaker Medtronic EnRhythm
Sponsored by
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Atrial Fibrillation focused on measuring Physiological pacing, Antitachycardia pacing therapies

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Class I/Class II indications for dual chamber pacing Previous implant of an EnRhythm dual chamber implantable pulse generator (IPG) since maximum 2 weeks History of atrial arrhythmias (at least one electrocardiogram [ECG] or Holter documented episodes in the last 12 months) Exclusion Criteria: Less than 18 years of age Pregnancy Unwilling or unable to give informed consent or to commit to follow-up schedule Medical conditions that preclude protocol required testing or limit study participation Enrolled or intend to participate in another clinical trial during the course of this study A life expectancy of less than 2 years Patient is a candidate for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implant Anticipated major cardiac surgery within the course of this study Permanent III degree AV-block or history of AV node ablation History of permanent AF (as defined below) AF ablation (left pulmonary veins) or other cardiac surgery < 3 months Prior implant of defibrillator device or pacemaker (apart from EnRhythm IPG implanted within two weeks) Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism

Sites / Locations

  • Medtronic Italia S.p.A.

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Control Group

MVP Only

DDDRP

Arm Description

PM programming according to actual clinical practice

PM programming according to actual clinical practice + MVP algorithm ON

PM programming according to actual clinical practice + MVP algorithm ON + Atrial fibrillation therapies ON

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Composite Endpoint Composed by Death for Any Cause, Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Permanent AF at 2 Years
The outcome measurement is the 2 years incidence, calculated by Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of the composite endpoint composed by death for any cause, cardiovascular hospitalization or permanent AF.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Death for All Causes at 2 Years
Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of death for any cause at 2 years
Incidence of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation at 2 Years
Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of permanent atrial fibrillation at 2 years
Incidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations at 2 Years
Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of cardiovascular hospitalizations at 2 years
Burden of Composite Clinical Endpoint
Subjects' Symptoms
Heart Failure Medications
Cumulative Percentage of Ventricular Pacing
Cardiovascular Death
Any Hospitalization
Atrial Fibrillation Burden
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Adverse Events
Development of Atrioventricular (AV) Block and Pacemaker Dependency
Predictors of Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Arterial Embolism
Echocardiogram Data About Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening and Ejection Fraction and Left Atrium Dilatation
Clinical Outcome in All the Patients With MVP ON Between Patients With Optimized AV-delay and Patients Without Optimized AV-delay
Time to Development of the Composite Endpoint Between All Randomized Subjects in the Three Arms in Subgroups of Patients
Frequency, Type, and Associated Cost of Health Care Utilization and Utility

Full Information

First Posted
December 4, 2005
Last Updated
March 23, 2016
Sponsor
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00262119
Brief Title
MINERVA: MINimizE Right Ventricular Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
Official Title
MINERVA: MINimizE Right Ventricular Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medtronic Bakken Research Center

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to test the impact of the managed ventricular pacing (MVP) mode and atrial preventive and antitachycardia pacing therapies on the reduction of a composite clinical outcome composed of any death, permanent atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular hospitalizations.
Detailed Description
Kristensen et al. reported that AAIR pacing reduces atrial fibrillation (AF) development compared to DDDR pacing in sinus node disfunction patients. Several authors have shown that, in patients with intact AV conduction, unnecessary chronic RV pacing can cause detrimental effects such as AF, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and congestive heart failure. These findings arose the hypothesis that the non-physiologic nature of ventricular pacing may result in electrophysiological and LV remodeling changes that have potentially deleterious long-term effects. The MVP mode, present in the Medtronic pacemaker EnRhythm, provides atrial based pacing with ventricular backup. It operates in true AAI(R) mode, it provides ventricular backup in case of a single conduction loss and converts to DDD(R) mode in case of persistent loss of AV conduction. Aim of this study is to test the impact of the MVP pacing mode and atrial preventive and antitachycardia pacing therapies on the reduction of a composite clinical outcome composed by any death, permanent AF, cardiovascular hospitalizations.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Congestive
Keywords
Physiological pacing, Antitachycardia pacing therapies

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1300 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PM programming according to actual clinical practice
Arm Title
MVP Only
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PM programming according to actual clinical practice + MVP algorithm ON
Arm Title
DDDRP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PM programming according to actual clinical practice + MVP algorithm ON + Atrial fibrillation therapies ON
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Pacemaker Medtronic EnRhythm
Intervention Description
Pacemaker specific programming
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite Endpoint Composed by Death for Any Cause, Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Permanent AF at 2 Years
Description
The outcome measurement is the 2 years incidence, calculated by Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of the composite endpoint composed by death for any cause, cardiovascular hospitalization or permanent AF.
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Death for All Causes at 2 Years
Description
Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of death for any cause at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Incidence of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation at 2 Years
Description
Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of permanent atrial fibrillation at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Incidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations at 2 Years
Description
Incidence, estimated via Kaplan Meier survival analysis, of cardiovascular hospitalizations at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Burden of Composite Clinical Endpoint
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Subjects' Symptoms
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Heart Failure Medications
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Cumulative Percentage of Ventricular Pacing
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Cardiovascular Death
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Any Hospitalization
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Atrial Fibrillation Burden
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Adverse Events
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Development of Atrioventricular (AV) Block and Pacemaker Dependency
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Predictors of Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Arterial Embolism
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Echocardiogram Data About Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening and Ejection Fraction and Left Atrium Dilatation
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Clinical Outcome in All the Patients With MVP ON Between Patients With Optimized AV-delay and Patients Without Optimized AV-delay
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Time to Development of the Composite Endpoint Between All Randomized Subjects in the Three Arms in Subgroups of Patients
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Frequency, Type, and Associated Cost of Health Care Utilization and Utility
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Class I/Class II indications for dual chamber pacing Previous implant of an EnRhythm dual chamber implantable pulse generator (IPG) since maximum 2 weeks History of atrial arrhythmias (at least one electrocardiogram [ECG] or Holter documented episodes in the last 12 months) Exclusion Criteria: Less than 18 years of age Pregnancy Unwilling or unable to give informed consent or to commit to follow-up schedule Medical conditions that preclude protocol required testing or limit study participation Enrolled or intend to participate in another clinical trial during the course of this study A life expectancy of less than 2 years Patient is a candidate for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implant Anticipated major cardiac surgery within the course of this study Permanent III degree AV-block or history of AV node ablation History of permanent AF (as defined below) AF ablation (left pulmonary veins) or other cardiac surgery < 3 months Prior implant of defibrillator device or pacemaker (apart from EnRhythm IPG implanted within two weeks) Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luigi Padeletti, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Ospedale Careggi - Firenze
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giuseppe Boriani, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Ospedale Sant'Orsola - Bologna
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luis Mont, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Reinhard C Funck, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Philipps University Hospital - Marburg
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carsten W Israel, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
J. W. Goethe University Hospital - Frankfurt
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helmut Pürerfellner, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Elisabethinen Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antonis S Manolis, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Evagelismos Hospital - Athens
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
André Pisapia, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
Hôpital Saint-Joseph - Marseille
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raymond Tukkie, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
Kennemer Gasthuis
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medtronic Italia S.p.A.
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00193
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10805823
Citation
Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, Roberts RS, Yusuf S, Gillis AM, Sami MH, Talajic M, Tang AS, Klein GJ, Lau C, Newman DM. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1385-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421902.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12063369
Citation
Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R, Marinchak RA, Flaker G, Schron E, Orav EJ, Hellkamp AS, Greer S, McAnulty J, Ellenbogen K, Ehlert F, Freedman RA, Estes NA 3rd, Greenspon A, Goldman L; Mode Selection Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1854-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013040.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9519322
Citation
Mattioli AV, Vivoli D, Mattioli G. Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation. A prospective study. Eur Heart J. 1998 Feb;19(2):282-6. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0616.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9652562
Citation
Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350(9086):1210-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03425-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15145874
Citation
Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK, Andersen HR. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Heart. 2004 Jun;90(6):661-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.016063.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9529267
Citation
Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation. 1998 Mar 17;97(10):987-95. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.10.987.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12932590
Citation
Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20;42(4):614-23. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00757-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24771721
Citation
Boriani G, Tukkie R, Manolis AS, Mont L, Purerfellner H, Santini M, Inama G, Serra P, de Sousa J, Botto GL, Mangoni L, Grammatico A, Padeletti L; MINERVA Investigators. Atrial antitachycardia pacing and managed ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias: the MINERVA randomized multicentre international trial. Eur Heart J. 2014 Sep 14;35(35):2352-62. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu165. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
18760124
Citation
Funck RC, Boriani G, Manolis AS, Puererfellner H, Mont L, Tukkie R, Pisapia A, Israel CW, Grovale N, Grammatico A, Padeletti L; MINERVA Study Group. The MINERVA study design and rationale: a controlled randomized trial to assess the clinical benefit of minimizing ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias. Am Heart J. 2008 Sep;156(3):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.004.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

MINERVA: MINimizE Right Ventricular Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs