search
Back to results

Atomoxetine and Huntington's Disease

Primary Purpose

Huntington Disease, Chorea

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
atomoxetine
Matching Placebo
Sponsored by
University of Iowa
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Huntington Disease focused on measuring Huntington Disease, Chorea, Attention, ADHD, ADD, Strattera, Atomoxetine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Confirmed Huntington's disease (HD) diagnosis Age 18 to 65 Must have mild HD Must have complaints of poor attention Exclusion Criteria: Childhood history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, dementia, delirium or severe anxiety Current use of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) medication Pregnancy Uncontrolled hypertension Tachycardia Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease History of a loss of consciousness for greater than (or equal to) 5 minutes Having any neurological disorder or insult other than Huntington disease

Sites / Locations

  • The University of Iowa

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine

Twice a day matching placebo

Arm Description

Participants received 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine for 4 weeks.

Participants received twice a day matching placebo for 4 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Conners' Adult Attention Rating Scale (CAARS)
The Conners' Adult Attention Rating Scale (CAARS) is one of the most frequently used self-rating measures for adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and was given as a self-report measure of attention. It has 66 items with each item ranging from 0 to 3 points. Higher total scores represent greater impairment. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Attention Composite Score
The attention composite comprises performance on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Symbol-Digit and Letter Number Sequencing Subtests, Trail Making Test Part A, computerized simple-choice reaction time, and computerized working memory (i.e., 2-Back). The composite score is the average combined z score for each test. Higher, positive values indicate better than average performance and negative and lower values indicate worse than average. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Executive Composite Score
The executive composite comprises performance on Trail Making Test Part B, Stroop Color and Word Test, and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (i.e., Verbal Fluency). The composite score is the average combined z score for each test. Positive values indicate better than average performance and negative values worse than average. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)
Psychiatric symptoms were evaluated with the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, a self report measure of psychiatric symptoms. The measure produces raw scores and normed scores (T scores Mean = 50), with higher values representing greater impairment. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Motor Score
Although changes in motor symptoms were not hypothesized, the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale motor examination was administered at every visit. An experienced motor rater completes a motor examination and rates the participant on several motor tasks. Total score ranges from 0 - 124, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.

Full Information

First Posted
August 24, 2006
Last Updated
December 18, 2012
Sponsor
University of Iowa
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00368849
Brief Title
Atomoxetine and Huntington's Disease
Official Title
Atomoxetine for Attention Deficits in Adults With Mild HD: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Iowa
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effect of atomoxetine (also known as Strattera) compared to placebo (inactive substance) on daily activities such as attention and focus, thinking ability and muscle movements in subjects with early Huntington Disease (HD) and attention deficit disorder (ADD).
Detailed Description
No medications have been investigated to improve attention and executive functions in patients with Huntington's disease, despite the evidence that these cognitive domains can be abnormal even before motor symptom onset. Because cognitive symptoms are highly associated with functional disability, treatments aimed at improving cognitive functions would be of significant benefit to patients in the early stages of the disease. Atomoxetine is the ideal choice for such a trial. It has proven efficacy in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and it selectively targets norepinephrine and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex rather than in subcortical areas. This selectivity is an advantage for patients with HD, because motor side effects are less likely to be facilitated than with a psychostimulant. The present study is a feasibility study in which we propose to administer either 80 milligram (mg) atomoxetine for 4 weeks or placebo to 20 patients with early HD who also complain of mild cognitive symptoms. The groups will then crossover to the other condition (atomoxetine or placebo). Participants will be assessed on measures of ADHD symptoms and a sensitive battery of neuropsychological tests. Based on the shared neural circuitry in ADHD and HD, and the demonstrated effectiveness of atomoxetine on attention in adults with ADHD, improved performance on cognitive tests of attention and executive functions and on subjects' report of ADHD symptoms are expected in the atomoxetine treatment phase. No changes in motor status are predicted during the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Huntington Disease, Chorea
Keywords
Huntington Disease, Chorea, Attention, ADHD, ADD, Strattera, Atomoxetine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine for 4 weeks.
Arm Title
Twice a day matching placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received twice a day matching placebo for 4 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
atomoxetine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Strattera
Intervention Description
This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Matching Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sugar pill
Intervention Description
This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive twice a day matching placebo at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Conners' Adult Attention Rating Scale (CAARS)
Description
The Conners' Adult Attention Rating Scale (CAARS) is one of the most frequently used self-rating measures for adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and was given as a self-report measure of attention. It has 66 items with each item ranging from 0 to 3 points. Higher total scores represent greater impairment. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Time Frame
There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
Title
Attention Composite Score
Description
The attention composite comprises performance on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Symbol-Digit and Letter Number Sequencing Subtests, Trail Making Test Part A, computerized simple-choice reaction time, and computerized working memory (i.e., 2-Back). The composite score is the average combined z score for each test. Higher, positive values indicate better than average performance and negative and lower values indicate worse than average. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Time Frame
There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
Title
Executive Composite Score
Description
The executive composite comprises performance on Trail Making Test Part B, Stroop Color and Word Test, and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (i.e., Verbal Fluency). The composite score is the average combined z score for each test. Positive values indicate better than average performance and negative values worse than average. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Time Frame
There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)
Description
Psychiatric symptoms were evaluated with the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, a self report measure of psychiatric symptoms. The measure produces raw scores and normed scores (T scores Mean = 50), with higher values representing greater impairment. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Time Frame
There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
Title
Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Motor Score
Description
Although changes in motor symptoms were not hypothesized, the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale motor examination was administered at every visit. An experienced motor rater completes a motor examination and rates the participant on several motor tasks. Total score ranges from 0 - 124, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.
Time Frame
There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Confirmed Huntington's disease (HD) diagnosis Age 18 to 65 Must have mild HD Must have complaints of poor attention Exclusion Criteria: Childhood history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, dementia, delirium or severe anxiety Current use of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) medication Pregnancy Uncontrolled hypertension Tachycardia Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease History of a loss of consciousness for greater than (or equal to) 5 minutes Having any neurological disorder or insult other than Huntington disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leigh J Beglinger, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
8458085
Citation
A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):971-83. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-e.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9745236
Citation
Campodonico JR, Aylward E, Codori AM, Young C, Krafft L, Magdalinski M, Ranen N, Slavney PR, Brandt J. When does Huntington's disease begin? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998 Sep;4(5):467-73. doi: 10.1017/s1355617798455061.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9679784
Citation
Lawrence AD, Hodges JR, Rosser AE, Kershaw A, ffrench-Constant C, Rubinsztein DC, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ. Evidence for specific cognitive deficits in preclinical Huntington's disease. Brain. 1998 Jul;121 ( Pt 7):1329-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.7.1329.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11524475
Citation
Paulsen JS, Zhao H, Stout JC, Brinkman RR, Guttman M, Ross CA, Como P, Manning C, Hayden MR, Shoulson I; Huntington Study Group. Clinical markers of early disease in persons near onset of Huntington's disease. Neurology. 2001 Aug 28;57(4):658-62. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.4.658.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10668713
Citation
Marder K, Zhao H, Myers RH, Cudkowicz M, Kayson E, Kieburtz K, Orme C, Paulsen J, Penney JB Jr, Siemers E, Shoulson I. Rate of functional decline in Huntington's disease. Huntington Study Group. Neurology. 2000 Jan 25;54(2):452-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.2.452. Erratum In: Neurology 2000 Apr 25;54(8):1712.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11198293
Citation
Gomez-Tortosa E, MacDonald ME, Friend JC, Taylor SA, Weiler LJ, Cupples LA, Srinidhi J, Gusella JF, Bird ED, Vonsattel JP, Myers RH. Quantitative neuropathological changes in presymptomatic Huntington's disease. Ann Neurol. 2001 Jan;49(1):29-34.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Beglinger, L. et al. The association between speed of processing and cerebral white matter volume in patients with mild Huntington's disease [abstract]. Poster session accepted at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, April, 2004
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9878201
Citation
Halliday GM, McRitchie DA, Macdonald V, Double KL, Trent RJ, McCusker E. Regional specificity of brain atrophy in Huntington's disease. Exp Neurol. 1998 Dec;154(2):663-72. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1998.6919.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Nopoulos, P. et al., (under review). Structural Brain Abnormalities in pre-symptomatic Huntington's disease.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9443488
Citation
Aylward EH, Anderson NB, Bylsma FW, Wagster MV, Barta PE, Sherr M, Feeney J, Davis A, Rosenblatt A, Pearlson GD, Ross CA. Frontal lobe volume in patients with Huntington's disease. Neurology. 1998 Jan;50(1):252-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.1.252.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9055518
Citation
Casey BJ, Castellanos FX, Giedd JN, Marsh WL, Hamburger SD, Schubert AB, Vauss YC, Vaituzis AC, Dickstein DP, Sarfatti SE, Rapoport JL. Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;36(3):374-83. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199703000-00016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10982499
Citation
Hale TS, Hariri AR, McCracken JT. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: perspectives from neuroimaging. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(3):214-9. doi: 10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:33.0.CO;2-M.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2002218
Citation
Heilman KM, Voeller KK, Nadeau SE. A possible pathophysiologic substrate of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Neurol. 1991;6 Suppl:S76-81. doi: 10.1177/0883073891006001s09.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9585725
Citation
Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, Prince J, Hatch M, Jones J, Harding M, Faraone SV, Seidman L. Effectiveness and tolerability of tomoxetine in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 May;155(5):693-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.5.693.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12547466
Citation
Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, Reimherr FW, West SA, Allen AJ, Kelsey D, Wernicke J, Dietrich A, Milton D. Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jan 15;53(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01671-2.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Conners, CK et al. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). 1999. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.uihealthcare.com/depts/huntingtonsdisease/index.html
Description
University of Iowa Huntington's Disease Center of Excellence

Learn more about this trial

Atomoxetine and Huntington's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs