search
Back to results

Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity With Enhanced Proprioceptive Feedback Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Primary Purpose

Spinal Cord Injury, Tetraplegia, Paresis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
AMES treatment
Sponsored by
Oregon Health and Science University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Cord Injury focused on measuring Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, Rehabilitation, Upper Extremity, AMES device, Incomplete SCI, Quadriplegia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic SCI with tetraplegia.
  • Male or female.
  • 18-65 yrs old.
  • At least 1 yr post-SCI.
  • Tolerate sitting upright at for at least one hour.
  • Able to perceive direction of passive joint(s) motion of the upper extremity(ies) to be treated 70% or more of the times tested.
  • Motor grade >1 in the wrist extensors, finger flexors and finger abductors (the 3 muscles related to hand movements in the ASIA scale) in the upper extremity tested.
  • Cognitively and behaviorally capable of complying with the regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fracture of the treated limb resulting in loss of range of motion
  • Concomitant TBI or stroke (Patients who sustained mild head injury during the trauma with no evidence of structural abnormalities on brain images will qualify for the study)
  • DVT of the treated extremity
  • Peripheral nerve injury of the treated extremity
  • Osteo- or rheumatoid-arthritis limiting range of motion
  • Contractures equal to or greater than 50% of the normal ROM
  • Skin condition not tolerant of device
  • Progressive neurodegenerative disorder
  • Botox treatment of the treated extremity in the prior 5 month
  • Chronic ITB therapy
  • Uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina
  • Pain in affected limb or exercise intolerance

Sites / Locations

  • Shepherd Center
  • Oregon Health and Science University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

AMES treatment

Arm Description

The subject will receive 25 treatment sessions, conducted 2-3 times per week on the AMES device. Each session will consist of testing followed by 30 minutes of wrist and finger rehabilitation using the AMES device.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Grasp Release Test
The task involves picking up, transporting, and placing six objects (i.e., peg, paperweight, fork, block, can, and videotape). Movement of each of the 6 objects is scored based on the number of times the participant can move the object in 30 seconds, with a minimum score of zero if no objects are successfully moved. A cumulative score is based on the sum of all completed movements for all 6 objects.

Secondary Outcome Measures

ASIA Motor Key Muscles
ISNCSCI Assessment of motor function (upper limb only). Scores on a scale ranging from 0 (i.e., total paralysis) - 5 (i.e., full range of motion) for each of 5 upper limb muscle groups. Total score represents the overall level of the upper limb impairment and represents the sum of the 5 scores from the 5 upper limb muscle groups. Accordingly, the total score has a range of 0-25, with 0 representing a completely paralyzed upper limb and 25 representing a normally functioning upper limb.
ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/ Light-Touch
Measures the subject's sensory perception, with eyes closed, of a light touch by the tester on 9 key sensory points of the hand, arm, shoulder and neck. Sensation at each key point is rated as a number on a scale from 0 (no feeling) to 2 (normal feeling), with a score of 1 representing partly diminished feeling. The overall sensation of the upper limb and nearby areas is represented as the sum of all 9 individual key point scores and, therefore, has an overall range of 0-18, with higher scores representing better sensation.
ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/Pin-Prick
Measures the subject's sensory perception, with eyes closed, of a light prick of a safety pin produced by the tester on 9 key sensory points of the hand, arm, shoulder and neck. Sensation at each key point is rated as a number on a scale from 0 (no feeling) to 2 (normal feeling), with a score of 1 representing partly diminished feeling. The overall sensation of the upper limb and nearby areas is represented as the sum of all 9 individual key point scores and, therefore, has an overall range of 0-18, with higher scores representing better sensation.
Van Lieshout Hand Function Test for Tetraplegia- Short Version
Measures the functional movement in the upper limb of people with cervical spinal cord injury. The short version of this test includes a total of 10 different functional tasks to be performed by the subject with the upper limb. For example, one task is to reach and pick up a filled Coke bottle, set it down, and then replace it in its original position. Each task is scored on a scale of 0-5, 0 representing inability to perform the task and 5 representing normal movement. A single, total score is calculated as the sum of the scores on the 10 tasks, and therefore, has an overall range of 0-50, with higher scores representing better performance.
Modified Ashworth Scale
Measurement of joint stiffness (tone/spasticity). Score is based on sum of MAS value for 4 muscle groups: (1) Wrist/finger flexors, (2) Wrist/finger extensors, (3) elbow flexors, and (4) elbow extensors. Each muscle group and direction is score on a scale of 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 5 (rigid), with a score of 2 used instead of 1+. A single overall score representing the sum of all 4 muscle groups and directions is used and has a range of 0-20 with higher scores representing more severe impairment.
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Instrument
Subjective questionnaire of participants' self-perceptions of upper limb function that contains 17 questions relating to the use of the right upper limb, the same 17 relating to the use of the lower upper limb, plus two additional questions relating to bimanual function. Responses to each item of the questionnaire has a range of 1 (i.e., "totally limited") to 7 (i.e., "not at all limited"). A total cumulative score used for the study is based on the sum of the responses to all 34 questions (i.e., 16 right arm, 16 left arm, 2 both arms), and therefore has a cumulative score range of 32 - 224, with higher scores indicating more function.
Strength Test - Thumb/Finger Extension
Maximum strength of thumb-and-fingers in extension. Pre-training score is average of a total of 3 scores, including 1 score from each of the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 3 scores, including 1 score from each of the last 3 days of training.
Strength Test - Thumb/Fingers Flexion
Maximum strength of Thumb/fingers in Flexion Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training.
Strength Test - Wrist Extension
Maximum wrist strength in extension Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training.
Strength Test - Wrist Flexion
Maximum strength in flexion direction Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training.
Active Motion Test - Fingers/Thumb
Tracking task for the thumb and finger, i.e., opening and closing the hand. The participant tracks a target box on a video screen by actively moving the thumb and fingers, first in the opening direction, then closing, and finally opeining again. The participant's thumb-and-finger position is represented on the video screen by a vertical line that he/she attempts to keep in the the target box. Performance on this task is scored as the amount of time, in seconds, that the participant keeps the line in the target box. The maximum total score in this test is 60 seconds. The "Pre-training Score" is the average score obtained during the first 3 days of training, and the Post-training Score" is average score obtained during the last 3 days of training.
Active Motion Test - Wrist
Tracking task for the wrist, i.e., flexing (i.e., pull with the front of the hand) and extending (i.e., pushing with the back of the hand). The participant tracks a target box on a video screen by actively moving the hand at the wrist, first in the extension direction, then flexion, and finally extension again. The participant's wrist position is represented on the video screen by a vertical line that he/she attempts to keep in the the target box. Performance on this task is scored as the amount of time, in seconds, that the participant keeps the line in the target box. The maximum total score in this test is 60 seconds. The "Pre-training Score" is the average score obtained during the first 3 days of training, and the Post-training Score" is average score obtained during the last 3 days of training.

Full Information

First Posted
January 29, 2009
Last Updated
April 16, 2019
Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Collaborators
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00833105
Brief Title
Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity With Enhanced Proprioceptive Feedback Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Official Title
Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity With Enhanced Proprioceptive Feedback Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Collaborators
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if tetraplegic individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) who remain unable to move their arms normally 1 year after their SCIs are able to sense and move the affected arm(s) better after 10-13 weeks of treatment with a new robotic therapy device. The hypothesis is that using the AMES device on the arm(s) of chronic tetraplegic subjects with incomplete SCI will result in improved strength, sensation, and functional movement in treated limb(s).
Detailed Description
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) affects over 200,000 people in the USA, with several thousand new injuries each year. Most recovery, following SCI, occurs in the six months following surgery. Further recovery after 12 months is unusual. In this study 13 subjects, more than 1 year post injury, were enrolled to test the safety and efficacy of a new type of robotic therapy device known as the AMES device. The aim of this Phase I/II study is to investigate the use of assisted movement and enhanced sensation (AMES) technology in hand rehabilitation of incomplete SCI subjects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injury, Tetraplegia, Paresis, Plegia
Keywords
Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, Rehabilitation, Upper Extremity, AMES device, Incomplete SCI, Quadriplegia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
13 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
AMES treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The subject will receive 25 treatment sessions, conducted 2-3 times per week on the AMES device. Each session will consist of testing followed by 30 minutes of wrist and finger rehabilitation using the AMES device.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
AMES treatment
Intervention Description
The AMES device rotates the fingers-thumb or the wrist in the flexion-extension directions over a range of 30 degrees while vibrators stimulate the tendons attached to muscles that are lengthened by the thumb-finger or hand movement. A treatment consists of 20 minutes of fingers-thumb movement, followed by 10 minutes of wrist movement. The subject's task is to assist the motion of the device.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Grasp Release Test
Description
The task involves picking up, transporting, and placing six objects (i.e., peg, paperweight, fork, block, can, and videotape). Movement of each of the 6 objects is scored based on the number of times the participant can move the object in 30 seconds, with a minimum score of zero if no objects are successfully moved. A cumulative score is based on the sum of all completed movements for all 6 objects.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
ASIA Motor Key Muscles
Description
ISNCSCI Assessment of motor function (upper limb only). Scores on a scale ranging from 0 (i.e., total paralysis) - 5 (i.e., full range of motion) for each of 5 upper limb muscle groups. Total score represents the overall level of the upper limb impairment and represents the sum of the 5 scores from the 5 upper limb muscle groups. Accordingly, the total score has a range of 0-25, with 0 representing a completely paralyzed upper limb and 25 representing a normally functioning upper limb.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Title
ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/ Light-Touch
Description
Measures the subject's sensory perception, with eyes closed, of a light touch by the tester on 9 key sensory points of the hand, arm, shoulder and neck. Sensation at each key point is rated as a number on a scale from 0 (no feeling) to 2 (normal feeling), with a score of 1 representing partly diminished feeling. The overall sensation of the upper limb and nearby areas is represented as the sum of all 9 individual key point scores and, therefore, has an overall range of 0-18, with higher scores representing better sensation.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Title
ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/Pin-Prick
Description
Measures the subject's sensory perception, with eyes closed, of a light prick of a safety pin produced by the tester on 9 key sensory points of the hand, arm, shoulder and neck. Sensation at each key point is rated as a number on a scale from 0 (no feeling) to 2 (normal feeling), with a score of 1 representing partly diminished feeling. The overall sensation of the upper limb and nearby areas is represented as the sum of all 9 individual key point scores and, therefore, has an overall range of 0-18, with higher scores representing better sensation.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Title
Van Lieshout Hand Function Test for Tetraplegia- Short Version
Description
Measures the functional movement in the upper limb of people with cervical spinal cord injury. The short version of this test includes a total of 10 different functional tasks to be performed by the subject with the upper limb. For example, one task is to reach and pick up a filled Coke bottle, set it down, and then replace it in its original position. Each task is scored on a scale of 0-5, 0 representing inability to perform the task and 5 representing normal movement. A single, total score is calculated as the sum of the scores on the 10 tasks, and therefore, has an overall range of 0-50, with higher scores representing better performance.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Title
Modified Ashworth Scale
Description
Measurement of joint stiffness (tone/spasticity). Score is based on sum of MAS value for 4 muscle groups: (1) Wrist/finger flexors, (2) Wrist/finger extensors, (3) elbow flexors, and (4) elbow extensors. Each muscle group and direction is score on a scale of 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 5 (rigid), with a score of 2 used instead of 1+. A single overall score representing the sum of all 4 muscle groups and directions is used and has a range of 0-20 with higher scores representing more severe impairment.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Title
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Instrument
Description
Subjective questionnaire of participants' self-perceptions of upper limb function that contains 17 questions relating to the use of the right upper limb, the same 17 relating to the use of the lower upper limb, plus two additional questions relating to bimanual function. Responses to each item of the questionnaire has a range of 1 (i.e., "totally limited") to 7 (i.e., "not at all limited"). A total cumulative score used for the study is based on the sum of the responses to all 34 questions (i.e., 16 right arm, 16 left arm, 2 both arms), and therefore has a cumulative score range of 32 - 224, with higher scores indicating more function.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Title
Strength Test - Thumb/Finger Extension
Description
Maximum strength of thumb-and-fingers in extension. Pre-training score is average of a total of 3 scores, including 1 score from each of the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 3 scores, including 1 score from each of the last 3 days of training.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week)
Title
Strength Test - Thumb/Fingers Flexion
Description
Maximum strength of Thumb/fingers in Flexion Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week)
Title
Strength Test - Wrist Extension
Description
Maximum wrist strength in extension Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week)
Title
Strength Test - Wrist Flexion
Description
Maximum strength in flexion direction Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week)
Title
Active Motion Test - Fingers/Thumb
Description
Tracking task for the thumb and finger, i.e., opening and closing the hand. The participant tracks a target box on a video screen by actively moving the thumb and fingers, first in the opening direction, then closing, and finally opeining again. The participant's thumb-and-finger position is represented on the video screen by a vertical line that he/she attempts to keep in the the target box. Performance on this task is scored as the amount of time, in seconds, that the participant keeps the line in the target box. The maximum total score in this test is 60 seconds. The "Pre-training Score" is the average score obtained during the first 3 days of training, and the Post-training Score" is average score obtained during the last 3 days of training.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week)
Title
Active Motion Test - Wrist
Description
Tracking task for the wrist, i.e., flexing (i.e., pull with the front of the hand) and extending (i.e., pushing with the back of the hand). The participant tracks a target box on a video screen by actively moving the hand at the wrist, first in the extension direction, then flexion, and finally extension again. The participant's wrist position is represented on the video screen by a vertical line that he/she attempts to keep in the the target box. Performance on this task is scored as the amount of time, in seconds, that the participant keeps the line in the target box. The maximum total score in this test is 60 seconds. The "Pre-training Score" is the average score obtained during the first 3 days of training, and the Post-training Score" is average score obtained during the last 3 days of training.
Time Frame
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Traumatic SCI with tetraplegia. Male or female. 18-65 yrs old. At least 1 yr post-SCI. Tolerate sitting upright at for at least one hour. Able to perceive direction of passive joint(s) motion of the upper extremity(ies) to be treated 70% or more of the times tested. Motor grade >1 in the wrist extensors, finger flexors and finger abductors (the 3 muscles related to hand movements in the ASIA scale) in the upper extremity tested. Cognitively and behaviorally capable of complying with the regimen. Exclusion Criteria: Fracture of the treated limb resulting in loss of range of motion Concomitant TBI or stroke (Patients who sustained mild head injury during the trauma with no evidence of structural abnormalities on brain images will qualify for the study) DVT of the treated extremity Peripheral nerve injury of the treated extremity Osteo- or rheumatoid-arthritis limiting range of motion Contractures equal to or greater than 50% of the normal ROM Skin condition not tolerant of device Progressive neurodegenerative disorder Botox treatment of the treated extremity in the prior 5 month Chronic ITB therapy Uncontrolled seizure disorder Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina Pain in affected limb or exercise intolerance
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul J. Cordo, Ph.D
Organizational Affiliation
Oregon Health and Science University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deborah Backus, PhD, PT
Organizational Affiliation
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shepherd Center
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97006
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18645190
Citation
Cordo P, Lutsep H, Cordo L, Wright WG, Cacciatore T, Skoss R. Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):67-77. doi: 10.1177/1545968308317437. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity With Enhanced Proprioceptive Feedback Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs