search
Back to results

Clinical Decision Support Consortium (CDSC)

Primary Purpose

Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Service based decision support intervention
Sponsored by
Brigham and Women's Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Diabetes focused on measuring clinical decision support, knowledge management, knowledge representation, clinical guidelines, coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PHS clinics using the LMR (Partners electronic health record system). These clinics include Massachusetts General Hospital Back Bay, Brigham Primary Physicians at Faulkner Hospital, Brigham PCA in Brookline, and Brigham and Women's Hospital at Foxboro.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Sites / Locations

  • Partners HealthCare - Information Systems, Wellesley Gateway

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Services Demo at PHS and RI

Normal CDS interventions at PHS and RI

Arm Description

Service based CDS intervention at PHS.

Normal CDS intervention at both PHS and RI hospitals

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Compliance with guideline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient outcomes

Full Information

First Posted
February 26, 2009
Last Updated
February 27, 2012
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00853619
Brief Title
Clinical Decision Support Consortium
Acronym
CDSC
Official Title
Clinical Decision Support Consortium for AHRQ CDS Research
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2013 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2013 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Consortium research study is to assess, define, demonstrate, and evaluate best practices for knowledge management (KM) and CDS in healthcare information technology across multiple ambulatory care settings and electronic health records (EHR) technology platforms. There are seven specific research objectives focusing on two practical areas of implementation for clinical decision support services: a) healthcare maintenance and preventive care screening, and b) two chronic disease conditions: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), and Adult-onset Diabetes Mellitus (AODM). The research objectives are: 1) Knowledge management lifecycle, 2) Knowledge specification, 3) Knowledge portal and repository, 4) CDS knowledge content and public web services, 5) CDS Dashboard, 6)Evaluation, and 7) Dissemination.
Detailed Description
Investigators and developers of electronic health records from both academe and industry have come together to form the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Consortium. Members of the CDS Consortium are intimately involved in creating and providing CDS tools and services in electronic health records used in both academic settings as well as community-based physician office practices. These investigators share a common interest and goal of enhancing the wide-spread adoption of CDS tools and services to improve the delivery of healthcare both domestically and world-wide. Our approach to the project is iterative and cyclical: we will begin with a survey of the knowledge management lifecycle and supporting infrastructure (such as knowledge management systems, terminology services and data standards) at the participating clinical sites. We will then work together to define best practices for translating knowledge into a multi-layered array of human readable knowledge artifacts and public web services. At each point in this process, we will conduct careful evaluation, documenting lessons learned from each site. The ultimate work products will fall into three main categories: First, tangible, actionable knowledge artifacts such as the shareable, human-readable and computable forms of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) under study, public web-services for CDS demonstrations, and a CDS Knowledge Portal and Repository to facilitate widespread adoption of these artifacts. Second, detailed guidance and recommendations, based on what we learn from our combined efforts, for external parties such as the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT), the Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP), and the clinical practice guideline developer community. Third, a set of knowledge and best practices, such as methods for the knowledge management lifecycle, development of both human readable knowledge artifacts and machine-interpretable knowledge, and management of decision-support related organizational change. We will share this knowledge through a variety of channels, such as presentations and academic papers.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension
Keywords
clinical decision support, knowledge management, knowledge representation, clinical guidelines, coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Services Demo at PHS and RI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Service based CDS intervention at PHS.
Arm Title
Normal CDS interventions at PHS and RI
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Normal CDS intervention at both PHS and RI hospitals
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Service based decision support intervention
Other Intervention Name(s)
Clinical Decision Support,, CDS Consortium,, Enterprise Clinical Rules Services
Intervention Description
Delivering CDS via services
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compliance with guideline
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient outcomes
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: PHS clinics using the LMR (Partners electronic health record system). These clinics include Massachusetts General Hospital Back Bay, Brigham Primary Physicians at Faulkner Hospital, Brigham PCA in Brookline, and Brigham and Women's Hospital at Foxboro. Exclusion Criteria: None
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Blackford Middleton, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Partners HealthCare - Information Systems, Wellesley Gateway
City
Wellesley
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02481
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19745260
Citation
Middleton B. The clinical decision support consortium. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:26-30.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Decision Support Consortium

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs