Stress, Hormones, and Eating (SHE)
Primary Purpose
Food Addiction, How Opioid Tone Was Related to Self Reported, Drive to Eat Using a Measure of Food Addiction
Status
Completed
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Naltrexone
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Food Addiction focused on measuring naltrexone, obesity, cortisol, food addiction
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women
- Age > 20 to 45 years (pre-menopausal women)
- BMI > 30 and no larger than BMI = 40 or 300 pounds
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent or speak English
- Needle phobic or fainting in response to blood draw
- Diabetes
- Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
- Currently Smoke
- Bulimia (Binge Eating Disorder is common among the obese, and allowed)
- Pacemaker
- Shift Worker
- Beta Blocker Medication use
- Liver Medication use
- Weight Loss Medication use
- Chronic current use of cortisol containing medications
- Kidney Disease (based on elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen and Creatinine)
- Illegal Drug Use (presence in urine)
- Liver Cirrhosis or Acute hepatitis (based on elevated Alanine transaminase)
- Substance abuse, mental health, or medical condition that, in the opinion of investigators, will affect study outcomes (e.g., hypertension, severe food allergies).
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Naltrexone
Placebo
Arm Description
4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.
4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Ideal Dosage
1) To examine criterion validity by testing whether level of opioid tone (based on response to naltrexone probe) is associated with self reported scores on non-homeostatic eating measures, behavioral and cognitive tasks assessing constructs related to addiction (eg, impulsivity) and ideal dosage (25 vs. 50 mg) in 60 obese women.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Test Retest Reliability
2) To examine test-retest reliability of naltrexone response one month later
Home Based Measures Reliability
3) To examine the reliability of home based measures. In other words, we will test whether cortisol and nausea responses taken in clinic, which are taken at highly controlled (accurate) times, are comparable to the responses from samples taken at home using saliva measures.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01175512
First Posted
July 28, 2010
Last Updated
January 25, 2021
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01175512
Brief Title
Stress, Hormones, and Eating
Acronym
SHE
Official Title
Novel Interventions to Reduce Stress Induced Non-homeostatic Eating
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators will develop a measure of endogenous opioid tone that might serve as a biological marker for drive for palatable food. Using a 'naltrexone probe,' the investigators will assess whether individual response to one dose of an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone, is related to non-homeostatic eating in non-pregnant women.
Hypothesis 1: Naltrexone Response will be related to non-homeostatic eating.
Hypothesis 2: Response profiles to the 25 mg dose will be slightly less in magnitude than the 50 mg dose. However, responses will be similarly related to non-homeostatic eating measures.
Hypothesis 3: Response to naltrexone will be highly stable within individuals across time, in the absence of an intervention.
Detailed Description
Opioid tone may provide a way to identify people at risk of reward based eating, with more accuracy than self-report measures. Knowing such risk could improve treatment matching, and provide a biomarker to assess treatment progress. There is no direct measure of central opioid activity in humans, short of PET scans for opioid receptor binding. However, there is a promising indicator using an opioid antagonist such as naltrexone. Blocking opioid receptor releases the inhibitory opioidergic inputs to hypothalamic corticotropic releasing hormone (CRH) neurons, thus increasing CRH, and eventually cortisol in the blood. The extent of the cortisol rise in response to naltrexone might serve as an indicator of endogenous opioidergic tone. It is hypothesized that greater increases in cortisol indicate weaker endogenous opioid activity (by indicating a more complete opioid blockade). Salivary cortisol response to naltrexone may offer a relatively safe and unobtrusive way to measure endogenous opioidergic tone. We propose to test the reliability and validity of the naltrexone probe, taken at home, as a measure of endogenous opioidergic tone. In a previous study (Daubenmier et al, 2013), we administered a one time 50mg dose of naltrexone and examined nausea and cortisol responses. Results suggested that responses were higher in those who showed greater drive to eat. Here we examine a more direct measure of drive to eat, using the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), and test whether nausea and cortisol responses were associated with greater drive to eat, whether 50mg produced greater responses than 25 mg, and whether the responses were stable (highly related) when tested again one month later.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Food Addiction, How Opioid Tone Was Related to Self Reported, Drive to Eat Using a Measure of Food Addiction
Keywords
naltrexone, obesity, cortisol, food addiction
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Naltrexone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Naltrexone
Intervention Description
4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ideal Dosage
Description
1) To examine criterion validity by testing whether level of opioid tone (based on response to naltrexone probe) is associated with self reported scores on non-homeostatic eating measures, behavioral and cognitive tasks assessing constructs related to addiction (eg, impulsivity) and ideal dosage (25 vs. 50 mg) in 60 obese women.
Time Frame
May 2012
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Test Retest Reliability
Description
2) To examine test-retest reliability of naltrexone response one month later
Time Frame
May 2012
Title
Home Based Measures Reliability
Description
3) To examine the reliability of home based measures. In other words, we will test whether cortisol and nausea responses taken in clinic, which are taken at highly controlled (accurate) times, are comparable to the responses from samples taken at home using saliva measures.
Time Frame
May 2012
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Women
Age > 20 to 45 years (pre-menopausal women)
BMI > 30 and no larger than BMI = 40 or 300 pounds
Exclusion Criteria:
Inability to provide informed consent or speak English
Needle phobic or fainting in response to blood draw
Diabetes
Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
Currently Smoke
Bulimia (Binge Eating Disorder is common among the obese, and allowed)
Pacemaker
Shift Worker
Beta Blocker Medication use
Liver Medication use
Weight Loss Medication use
Chronic current use of cortisol containing medications
Kidney Disease (based on elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen and Creatinine)
Illegal Drug Use (presence in urine)
Liver Cirrhosis or Acute hepatitis (based on elevated Alanine transaminase)
Substance abuse, mental health, or medical condition that, in the opinion of investigators, will affect study outcomes (e.g., hypertension, severe food allergies).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elissa Epel, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19121351
Citation
Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD. Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale. Appetite. 2009 Apr;52(2):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24291355
Citation
Daubenmier J, Lustig RH, Hecht FM, Kristeller J, Woolley J, Adam T, Dallman M, Epel E. A new biomarker of hedonic eating? A preliminary investigation of cortisol and nausea responses to acute opioid blockade. Appetite. 2014 Mar;74:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Stress, Hormones, and Eating
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs