search
Back to results

Biofeedback-based Motor Learning to Ameliorate Freezing of Gait

Primary Purpose

Gait, Parkinson Disease

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Israel
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biofeedback-based motor learning for PD
Sponsored by
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Gait focused on measuring Freezing, biofeedback, motor learning, freezing of gait in PD

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:1) Have a diagnosis of PD 2) Suffer from the FOG symptom. Subjects must score 2 or more on item #3 of the subjective FOG questionnaire (FOG-Q)and exhibit two or more FOG episodes during a short, functional FOG evaluation procedure that includes FOG-provoking conditions (e.g., turns, doorways) and 5 laps of walking in a figure 8 shaped trajectory 3) Free of serious co-morbidities or acute illness that would make training inappropriate.

Exclusion Criteria:

1) Unable to walk unassisted for at least 5 minutes with ample rest. 2)Brain surgery.

Sites / Locations

  • Laboratory for Gait and Neurodynamics, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Feedforward stimulation

Feedback stimulation

Arm Description

Prior to any gait condition likely to invoke freez, auditory stimulation is presented

Once a device identifies freezing, a auditory stimulation is triggered

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of freezing episodes
In lab examinaiton and then in 3 days of ambulatory monitoring, the nubmer of freezing episodes will be counted before and after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

duration of freezing episodes
In lab examinaiton and then in 3 days of ambulatory monitoring, the duration of freezing episodes will be counted before and after the intervention

Full Information

First Posted
October 17, 2010
Last Updated
October 18, 2010
Sponsor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01223781
Brief Title
Biofeedback-based Motor Learning to Ameliorate Freezing of Gait
Official Title
Biofeedback-based Motor Learning to Ameliorate Freezing of Gait
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2012 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2012 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Objective/Rationale: The investigators objective is to demonstrate that an intervention program based on motor learning principles can be applied to train subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) who suffer from freezing to walk in a way that minimizes the occurrence of freezing. Since sufficient motor learning capabilities are preserved in PD, the investigators hypothesize that an intervention program that targets the time periods just prior to an approaching freezing episode can modify the walking strategies so that the episode will now be averted. Project Description: The freezing burden will be quantified in subjects with PD before and after 6 weeks of training. Two types of interventions (20 subjects in each group) will be tested: 1) Open-loop group (OLG); 2) Closed-loop group (CLG). Each session of the OLG training includes walking courses aimed at provoking freezing episodes. The experimenter will trigger an auditory rhythmic stimulation (RAS) in walking conditions likely to invoke freezing (e.g., turning) and the subject will learn to synchronize his/her gait with the auditory cues, i.e., to keep the walking pace and coordination and, as a result, to avoid freezing. Similar principles will apply for the CLG training; however, the RAS will be elicited automatically by a device that recognizes an approaching freezing episode. Relevance to Diagnosis/Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: If even partially successful, the investigators will show, for the first time that freezing of gait is amenable to motor learning and that appropriate training with external cueing can alleviate these motor blockades. While future studies will be needed to further assess long-term efficacy and other important questions about clinical efficacy and the mechanisms involved, this study should go a long way towards improving the investigators understanding of freezing of gait and its amenability to appropriate therapy. Anticipated Outcome: The investigators anticipate that after intensive training, the central nervous system (CNS) of subjects with PD will be able to anticipate impending freezing episodes based on awareness of the environmental conditions (e.g., an approaching turn) and/or based on sub-conscious response to a deteriorating gait pattern. As a result, an automated motor response that paces and coordinates gait will be internally triggered by the CNS and the approaching freezing episode will be averted. The overall freezing burden will therefore decrease in trained subjects.
Detailed Description
Overview: This will be a randomized trial to demonstrate the effects of 6-weeks of training with open-loop or triggered, closed-loop cueing. PD+ FOG patients will be studied before and after 6 weeks of training (total of 18 sessions) and one month later (to begin to assess retention). The two intervention groups will receive training sessions designed to enhance implicit motor learning and avoidance of FOG. This will be the first study to assess these novel paradigms. If the results support the hypotheses, further studies will be needed including a placebo-controlled trial. 20 subjects will be included in the feed-forward, open-loop group (OLG) and 20 in the feedback, closed-loop group (CLG) (based on power analysis to provide 80% power at α=0.05). Participants will be recruited on a rolling admission basis (about 2 subjects per week over ~20 weeks) and will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups. Pre, post and retention effects will be tested without knowledge of group assignment. A (repeated measures) mixed models statistical approach will be used to evaluate within and across group effects over time, adjusting for baseline values. The study will be conducted under the auspices of the Laboratory for Gait and Neurodynamics and the Movement Disorders Unit (MDU) at the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. At all times during training and testing, the subjects will be closely monitored by a research assistant to ensure safety.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gait, Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Freezing, biofeedback, motor learning, freezing of gait in PD

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Feedforward stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Prior to any gait condition likely to invoke freez, auditory stimulation is presented
Arm Title
Feedback stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Once a device identifies freezing, a auditory stimulation is triggered
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Biofeedback-based motor learning for PD
Intervention Description
Prior to freezing episodes, auditory stimulation is triggered
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of freezing episodes
Description
In lab examinaiton and then in 3 days of ambulatory monitoring, the nubmer of freezing episodes will be counted before and after the intervention.
Time Frame
3 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
duration of freezing episodes
Description
In lab examinaiton and then in 3 days of ambulatory monitoring, the duration of freezing episodes will be counted before and after the intervention
Time Frame
3 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:1) Have a diagnosis of PD 2) Suffer from the FOG symptom. Subjects must score 2 or more on item #3 of the subjective FOG questionnaire (FOG-Q)and exhibit two or more FOG episodes during a short, functional FOG evaluation procedure that includes FOG-provoking conditions (e.g., turns, doorways) and 5 laps of walking in a figure 8 shaped trajectory 3) Free of serious co-morbidities or acute illness that would make training inappropriate. Exclusion Criteria: 1) Unable to walk unassisted for at least 5 minutes with ample rest. 2)Brain surgery.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Meir Plotnik, PhD
Phone
972 326974958
Email
meirp@tasmc.health.gov.il
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jeffrey M Hausdorff, PhD
Phone
972 326974958
Email
jhausdor@tasmc.health.gov.il
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Laboratory for Gait and Neurodynamics, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
City
Tel Aviv
ZIP/Postal Code
64239
Country
Israel
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meir Plotnik, PhD
Phone
+972-3-6974958
Email
meirp@tasmc.health.gov.il
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meir Plotnik, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19906597
Citation
Bachlin M, Plotnik M, Roggen D, Maidan I, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N, Troster G. Wearable assistant for Parkinson's disease patients with the freezing of gait symptom. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010 Mar;14(2):436-46. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2009.2036165. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Biofeedback-based Motor Learning to Ameliorate Freezing of Gait

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs