search
Back to results

Clinical Trial Comparing Decompression With and Without Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Primary Purpose

Spinal Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Implantation of coflex™ after surgical decompression
Surgical decompression
Sponsored by
Paradigm Spine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Stenosis focused on measuring Back Pains, Pain, Back, Pains, Back, Backache, Backaches, Back Ache, Ache, Back, Aches, Back, Back Aches, Back Pain without Radiation, Vertebrogenic Pain Syndrome, Pain Syndrome, Vertebrogenic, Pain Syndromes, Vertebrogenic, Syndrome, Vertebrogenic Pain, Syndromes, Vertebrogenic Pain, Vertebrogenic Pain Syndromes, Back Pain with Radiation, Stenosis, spinal, Caudal stenosis, Spondylopathy, Spondylopathies, Low back pain, Lower back pain

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Radiographic confirmation of clinical symptoms of at least moderate degenerative spinal stenosis, with constriction of the central spinal canal of one or two adjacent segments in the region L3 to L5 with the need for decompression.

    If necessary additional decompression in the adjacent segment(s) may be performed avoiding any instability in the affected segment.

    In addition the following may exist (but is not obligatory):

    • hypertrophy of the facet joints and subarticular recessus stenosis in the relevant segment or
    • stenosis of the foramen in the relevant segment
    • and/or stable retrolisthesis up to grade I verified by flexion-/extension X-ray films.
  2. Radiographic confirmation of no translatory instability in the main segment as well as in adjacent segments (dynamic translatory instability ≤ 3 mm).
  3. VAS back pain score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm scale (for acute back pain or a period of at least 3 month of back pain before the onset of leg pain).
  4. Minimum of 3 months conservative therapy without improvement of symptoms.
  5. Age >40 years.
  6. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score of at least 18/45 (40%) for German sites or 20/50 (40%) for the US sites (The question about sexual life will be excluded).
  7. Suitability of the patient for a posterior surgery procedure.
  8. Mental and physical ability of patient to follow the protocol according to compliance to time schedule, treatment plan, fill in of CRF pages and further study procedures.
  9. Personally signed informed consent form before the start of any study related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

Any of the following will exclude a subject from the study:

  1. Preceding fusion or decompression surgery of the lumbar spine or preceding nucleotomy of the segments of concern (also if nucleotomy becomes necessary during surgery).
  2. Radiographically confirmed damage of the vertebral body in the segment of concern in the lumbar spine (e.g. osteoporotic compression fracture or because of tumors)
  3. Isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis (anterolisthesis; retrolisthesis > grade I) or spondylolysis (Pars fracture).
  4. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (> 25°).
  5. Adipositas (obesity). Defined as a body mass index >40.
  6. Pregnancy, or wish to get pregnant during the course of the study.
  7. Known allergy for titanium and titanium alloys.
  8. Fluoride infections - both systemic and local.
  9. History of severe peripheral neuropathy.
  10. Significant peripheral vascular disease (claudication intermittens ≥ stage 2b).
  11. M. Paget or osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disorders.
  12. Cauda equina syndrome.
  13. Communicating diseases, including HIV, active hepatitis
  14. Patients who are lawfully kept in an institution.
  15. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, will be inappropriate for inclusion into this clinical trial or will not comply with requirements of the study.
  16. Subjects who participated in a clinical observation or therapy with X-ray during the last 10 years.
  17. Subjects who participate(d) in another clinical trial (within the last 4 weeks) that might influence the safety and effectiveness assessment of this trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Oberlinklinik Potsdam Orthopädische Fachklinik
  • Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Frankfurt a.M.
  • Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Rostock Neurochirurgie
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg Klinik für Orthopädie
  • Ostseeklinik Damp Neurochirurgie
  • Klinik für Neurochirurgie Lübeck
  • Klinik für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie mit Skoliosezentrum Klinikum Neustadt
  • Klinikum Ingolstadt Neurochirurgie

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

coflex™

Surgical decompression

Arm Description

Implantation of coflex™ device in assigned patients

Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in ODI From Baseline to 24 Months
The ODI, also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire is a questionnaire providing information on back and leg pain and the affects on managing everyday life by dividing questions into 10 sections. For this study, the questions on sexual activity will not be asked. The total possible score for each section is 0-5. The scores are then converted percentages ranging from 0% (minimal disability) to 100% (maximum possible disability).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Significant Migration or Expulsion of the Implant
Assess significant migration, defined as > 5mm by x-ray images (point of reference is the tip of the U-portion implant identified on the corresponding x-ray image).
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain From Baseline to 24 Months
Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg Pain From Baseline to 24 Months
Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Neurological Status - Mean Change in Sensory Deficit From Baseline to 24 Months
Sensory deficits will be assessed at nerves roots from L3, L4, L5, and S1. Grading score ranges from 1=absent to 3=normal.
Assessment of Time to Symptoms Utilizing Walking Distance Test
During this test, a patient has to walk on a treadmill (speed 1.8 km/h [12]) for 15 minutes (450 m) on a 0 degree ramp incline. It will be assessed time to first symptoms, time to severe symptoms and nature of symptoms (leg weakness, leg pain, back pain, or generalized fatigue, other). A time of zero will be recorded when symptoms were present at onset. The examination will be stopped after 15 minutes or at the onset of severe symptoms. Definition of severe symptoms is: The level of discomfort that would make patients stop their activities in usual life situations. It is assumed that patients with additional back pain will have more problems in managing the complete walking distance and therefore may stop the walking distance test before the endpoint at 15 minutes
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Operative Site
Number of Participants that experience adverse events related to the operative site from each group.
The Percentage of Patients With Survival Probability as Assessed by Evaluating Treatment Failure in Both Groups..
Treatment failure is defined as any secondary intervention, severe adverse event or other parameters that define the device as ineffective or not safe. The following events/outcomes were defined as treatment failures: wound revisions, patients with trauma requiring surgical intervention, disc hernia or dura repair, and/or pain management.
Change of Symptoms- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) After 24 Months Compared to Baseline.
The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.
Change in Functionality- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) From Baseline to 24 Months
The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.
Neurological Status - Mean Change in Muscle Strength From Baseline to 24 Months
Muscle strength will be assessed on right/left muscle strength at 6 groups of leg muscles. Score ranges from 0=contraction to 5=normal.
Assessment of Neurological Status Using the Laségue Test or Straight Leg Raise Test- Change From Baseline to 24 Months
The straight leg raise or a Laségue Test is used to assess a participant's low back pain. A positive outcome is identified if a participant experiences low back pain when the straight leg is at a certain angle (0-90 degrees). A negative test suggests a likely different cause for back pain. The test is performed on both right and left legs.
Number of Participants Receiving Epidural Injections
Epidural injections at up to 24 months
Neurological Status- Mean Change in Trendelenburg Sign Test From Baseline to 24 Months.
Trendelenburg's sign was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent Trendelenburg's sign, and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent Trendelenburg's sign.
Neurological Status- Mean Change in Ilio Sacral Joint Affection Test From Baseline to 24 Months.
Ilio sacral join affection test was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent llio sacral joint affection and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent sacral join affection.

Full Information

First Posted
March 15, 2011
Last Updated
June 1, 2020
Sponsor
Paradigm Spine
Collaborators
MDT Medical Device Testing GmbH, MCRA
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01316211
Brief Title
Clinical Trial Comparing Decompression With and Without Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Official Title
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Outcome in the Treatment of Degenerative Spinal Stenosis With Concomitant Low Back Pain by Decompression With and Without Additional Stabilization Using the Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Paradigm Spine
Collaborators
MDT Medical Device Testing GmbH, MCRA

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A 2 year comparative evaluation of clinical outcome in the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis with concomitant low back pain by decompression with and without additional stabilization using the coflex® Interlaminar Technology
Detailed Description
The coflex® implant for interlaminar stabilization has been in clinical use for more than 10 years and is CE-certified according to the standards and approved in the United States. This was a randomized multicenter study to collect prospective data for potential improvement in the therapy of low back pain during the treatment of spinal stenosis. The study was conducted in Germany.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Stenosis
Keywords
Back Pains, Pain, Back, Pains, Back, Backache, Backaches, Back Ache, Ache, Back, Aches, Back, Back Aches, Back Pain without Radiation, Vertebrogenic Pain Syndrome, Pain Syndrome, Vertebrogenic, Pain Syndromes, Vertebrogenic, Syndrome, Vertebrogenic Pain, Syndromes, Vertebrogenic Pain, Vertebrogenic Pain Syndromes, Back Pain with Radiation, Stenosis, spinal, Caudal stenosis, Spondylopathy, Spondylopathies, Low back pain, Lower back pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
246 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
coflex™
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Implantation of coflex™ device in assigned patients
Arm Title
Surgical decompression
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Implantation of coflex™ after surgical decompression
Intervention Description
The device will be implanted after surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Surgical decompression
Intervention Description
Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in ODI From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
The ODI, also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire is a questionnaire providing information on back and leg pain and the affects on managing everyday life by dividing questions into 10 sections. For this study, the questions on sexual activity will not be asked. The total possible score for each section is 0-5. The scores are then converted percentages ranging from 0% (minimal disability) to 100% (maximum possible disability).
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Significant Migration or Expulsion of the Implant
Description
Assess significant migration, defined as > 5mm by x-ray images (point of reference is the tip of the U-portion implant identified on the corresponding x-ray image).
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg Pain From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Neurological Status - Mean Change in Sensory Deficit From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
Sensory deficits will be assessed at nerves roots from L3, L4, L5, and S1. Grading score ranges from 1=absent to 3=normal.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Assessment of Time to Symptoms Utilizing Walking Distance Test
Description
During this test, a patient has to walk on a treadmill (speed 1.8 km/h [12]) for 15 minutes (450 m) on a 0 degree ramp incline. It will be assessed time to first symptoms, time to severe symptoms and nature of symptoms (leg weakness, leg pain, back pain, or generalized fatigue, other). A time of zero will be recorded when symptoms were present at onset. The examination will be stopped after 15 minutes or at the onset of severe symptoms. Definition of severe symptoms is: The level of discomfort that would make patients stop their activities in usual life situations. It is assumed that patients with additional back pain will have more problems in managing the complete walking distance and therefore may stop the walking distance test before the endpoint at 15 minutes
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Operative Site
Description
Number of Participants that experience adverse events related to the operative site from each group.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
The Percentage of Patients With Survival Probability as Assessed by Evaluating Treatment Failure in Both Groups..
Description
Treatment failure is defined as any secondary intervention, severe adverse event or other parameters that define the device as ineffective or not safe. The following events/outcomes were defined as treatment failures: wound revisions, patients with trauma requiring surgical intervention, disc hernia or dura repair, and/or pain management.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Change of Symptoms- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) After 24 Months Compared to Baseline.
Description
The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Change in Functionality- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Neurological Status - Mean Change in Muscle Strength From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
Muscle strength will be assessed on right/left muscle strength at 6 groups of leg muscles. Score ranges from 0=contraction to 5=normal.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Assessment of Neurological Status Using the Laségue Test or Straight Leg Raise Test- Change From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
The straight leg raise or a Laségue Test is used to assess a participant's low back pain. A positive outcome is identified if a participant experiences low back pain when the straight leg is at a certain angle (0-90 degrees). A negative test suggests a likely different cause for back pain. The test is performed on both right and left legs.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Number of Participants Receiving Epidural Injections
Description
Epidural injections at up to 24 months
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Neurological Status- Mean Change in Trendelenburg Sign Test From Baseline to 24 Months.
Description
Trendelenburg's sign was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent Trendelenburg's sign, and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent Trendelenburg's sign.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months
Title
Neurological Status- Mean Change in Ilio Sacral Joint Affection Test From Baseline to 24 Months.
Description
Ilio sacral join affection test was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent llio sacral joint affection and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent sacral join affection.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Radiographic confirmation of clinical symptoms of at least moderate degenerative spinal stenosis, with constriction of the central spinal canal of one or two adjacent segments in the region L3 to L5 with the need for decompression. If necessary additional decompression in the adjacent segment(s) may be performed avoiding any instability in the affected segment. In addition the following may exist (but is not obligatory): hypertrophy of the facet joints and subarticular recessus stenosis in the relevant segment or stenosis of the foramen in the relevant segment and/or stable retrolisthesis up to grade I verified by flexion-/extension X-ray films. Radiographic confirmation of no translatory instability in the main segment as well as in adjacent segments (dynamic translatory instability ≤ 3 mm). VAS back pain score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm scale (for acute back pain or a period of at least 3 month of back pain before the onset of leg pain). Minimum of 3 months conservative therapy without improvement of symptoms. Age >40 years. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score of at least 18/45 (40%) for German sites or 20/50 (40%) for the US sites (The question about sexual life will be excluded). Suitability of the patient for a posterior surgery procedure. Mental and physical ability of patient to follow the protocol according to compliance to time schedule, treatment plan, fill in of CRF pages and further study procedures. Personally signed informed consent form before the start of any study related procedures. Exclusion Criteria Any of the following will exclude a subject from the study: Preceding fusion or decompression surgery of the lumbar spine or preceding nucleotomy of the segments of concern (also if nucleotomy becomes necessary during surgery). Radiographically confirmed damage of the vertebral body in the segment of concern in the lumbar spine (e.g. osteoporotic compression fracture or because of tumors) Isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis (anterolisthesis; retrolisthesis > grade I) or spondylolysis (Pars fracture). Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (> 25°). Adipositas (obesity). Defined as a body mass index >40. Pregnancy, or wish to get pregnant during the course of the study. Known allergy for titanium and titanium alloys. Fluoride infections - both systemic and local. History of severe peripheral neuropathy. Significant peripheral vascular disease (claudication intermittens ≥ stage 2b). M. Paget or osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disorders. Cauda equina syndrome. Communicating diseases, including HIV, active hepatitis Patients who are lawfully kept in an institution. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, will be inappropriate for inclusion into this clinical trial or will not comply with requirements of the study. Subjects who participated in a clinical observation or therapy with X-ray during the last 10 years. Subjects who participate(d) in another clinical trial (within the last 4 weeks) that might influence the safety and effectiveness assessment of this trial.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oberlinklinik Potsdam Orthopädische Fachklinik
City
Potsdam
State/Province
Brandenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
14482
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Frankfurt a.M.
City
Frankfurt a.M.
State/Province
Hesse
ZIP/Postal Code
60528
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Rostock Neurochirurgie
City
Rostock
State/Province
Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania
ZIP/Postal Code
18057
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg Klinik für Orthopädie
City
Magdeburg
State/Province
Saxony-Anhalt
ZIP/Postal Code
39120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Ostseeklinik Damp Neurochirurgie
City
Damp
State/Province
Schleswig-Holstein
ZIP/Postal Code
24351
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinik für Neurochirurgie Lübeck
City
Lübeck
State/Province
Schleswig-Holstein
ZIP/Postal Code
23730
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinik für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie mit Skoliosezentrum Klinikum Neustadt
City
Neustadt
State/Province
Schleswig-Holstein
ZIP/Postal Code
23730
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Ingolstadt Neurochirurgie
City
Ingolstadt
ZIP/Postal Code
85049
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29372860
Citation
Schmidt S, Franke J, Rauschmann M, Adelt D, Bonsanto MM, Sola S. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Apr;28(4):406-415. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17643. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Trial Comparing Decompression With and Without Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs