search
Back to results

Clinical Evaluation of Stenfilcon A Soft Contact Lens When Compared to Ocufilcon B Soft Contact Lens

Primary Purpose

Myopia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
stenfilcon A contact lens
ocufilcon B contact lens
Sponsored by
Coopervision, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia focused on measuring silicone hydrogel contact lens, SHCL, stenfilcon A, ocufilcon B, daily disposable, substantial equivalence, CooperVision ClearSight™ 1 Day SCL

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Prior to being considered eligible to participate in this study, each subject MUST:

  • Be at least 18 years of age as of the date of evaluation for the study.
  • Have:

    • Read the Informed Consent
    • been given an explanation of the Informed Consent
    • indicated understanding of the Informed Consent
    • signed the Informed Consent document.
  • Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and able to keep all specified appointments.
  • Be an adapted, current full-time silicone hydrogel or soft contact lens wearer. An adapted full-time wearer is defined as wearing contact lenses on a daily basis for at least 8 hours per day for at least one month prior to participation in the study.
  • Possess wearable and visually functional eyeglasses.
  • Be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge.
  • Require spectacle lens powers between -1.00 and -6.00 diopters sphere with no more than 1.00 diopter of refractive astigmatism and be willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes.
  • Have manifest refraction Snellen visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than 20/25 in each eye.
  • Upon completing the fitting process with the lenses to be worn in the study, have contact lens Snellen VA equal to or better than 20/30 in each eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects may not be enrolled in this study if any of the following apply: The subject is/has:

  • Wearing lenses in a monovision modality and is unwilling to be fit with distance lenses in both eyes. NOTE: Subjects may not wear lenses in a monovision modality at any time during the study as it will interfere with the visual acuity analysis.
  • Poor personal hygiene.
  • Any active participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to this study.
  • Currently pregnant (to the best of the subject's knowledge), is lactating or is planning a pregnancy within the next 3 months.
  • A member, relative or household member of the investigator or of the investigational office staff.
  • Has a known sensitivity to ingredients used in the over the counter contact lens lubricants approved for use in the study.
  • Previous refractive surgery; or current or previous orthokeratology treatment.
  • Is aphakic or psuedophakic.
  • Ocular or systemic disease such as, but not limited to: anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present), glaucoma, Sjögren's syndrome, lupus erythematosus, sclerodermia, keratoconus or type II diabetes.
  • The need for topical ocular medications or any medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would require the lenses to be removed during the day.
  • The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
  • A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates or fungal infections.
  • A history of papillary conjunctivitis that has interfered with contact lens wear.
  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear, including but not limited to:

    • Pathological dry eye or associated dry eye symptoms with decreased tear levels and punctuate staining > Grade 2
    • Pterygium
    • Corneal scars within the visual axis
    • Neovascularization or ghost vessels > 1.0 mm in from the limbus
    • Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) of > Grade 2
    • Anterior uveitis or iritis
    • Seborrheic eczema, seborrheic conjunctivitis or blepharitis

To be eligible to be randomized for study product a subject must have ALL of the Inclusion Criteria and have NONE of the exclusion criteria present.

To be eligible for lens dispensing (either Test or Control), the subject's study lens contact lens visual acuity must be equal to or better than 20/30 in each eye.

Sites / Locations

  • Eric M. White, OD, Inc.
  • Vision Care Associates
  • Western Reserve Vision Care
  • Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

stenfilcon A contact lens

ocufilcon B contact lens

Arm Description

Randomized to stenfilcon A contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode

Randomized to ocufilcon B contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Objective Assessment: Ocular Response - Biomicroscopy
The primary safety endpoint are the objective slit lamp findings associated with the stenfilcon A contact lenses compared with those same findings reported as associated with the ocufilcon B contact lenses. The incidence of biomicroscopy findings (0=not present, 4=severe) over the duration of the study with the highest reported grade was chosen for each unique eye. Biomicroscopy measurements were obtained at Baseline (baseline visit) and All Follow-Ups (week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit combined).The average grade for unique eyes with findings greater than 0 (none) is compared.
Comparison of Objective Findings - Number of Adverse Events in Unique Eyes
The primary safety endpoint in this evaluation will be a comparison of the objective findings of the number of adverse events in unique eyes associated with the stenfilcon A contact lenses compared with those same findings as associated with ocufilcon B contact lenses. The number of adverse events over the duration of the study was reported for each unique eye (bilateral or unilateral). Observations for adverse events were reported for any occurrence after dispensing (dispensing visit) through end of month 3 visit (month 3 visit).
Comparison of Objective Findings for Contact Lens Visual Acuities - Snellen 20/25 VA or Better
The primary efficacy endpoint are the contact lens Snellen visual acuities (VA) of 20/25 VA or better associated with stenfilcon A compared with those same visual acuities associated with ocufilcon B. Snellen visual acuity (VA) examinations were performed at All Follow-up visits (week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit). The combined results of All Follow-up visits are compared.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Subjective Assessment of Contact Lens Comfort - No Symptoms of Discomfort
The secondary efficacy endpoint is the subjective assessment of contact lens comfort associated with the stenfilcon A contact lens compared with the comfort associated with the ocufilcon B contact lens. Subjective comfort assessment is related by the percent number of unique eyes that were reported to have no symptoms of discomfort (0=no symtoms reported) graded on a severity scale of the reported symptoms (0=no symptoms reported, 4=severe) that was experienced over the past month prior to baseline at the baseline visit (Baseline) and any symptoms of discomfort that was experienced since the previous study visit at each scheduled follow-up visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3).
Evaluation of Average Lens Wearing Time - Average Daily Hours Worn
The secondary efficacy endpoint is the objective assessment of the lens average daily wearing times associated with the stenfilcon A compared with the lens average wearing times with the ocufilcon B contact lens. Objective average daily lens wearing time is measured in reported hours worn with the subject's habitual contact lenses recorded at baseline and after dispensing of study lenses recorded at Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3.

Full Information

First Posted
January 10, 2011
Last Updated
July 19, 2020
Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01354223
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation of Stenfilcon A Soft Contact Lens When Compared to Ocufilcon B Soft Contact Lens
Official Title
Evaluation of the CooperVision Stenfilcon A Soft Contact Lens for Daily Wear When Compared to the CooperVision Ocufilcon B Soft Contact Lens
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study seeks to evaluate a new daily disposable contact lens compared to an existing daily disposable contact lens.
Detailed Description
This study is designed to evaluate the stenfilcon A contact lens to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the Ocufilcon B for market release.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myopia
Keywords
silicone hydrogel contact lens, SHCL, stenfilcon A, ocufilcon B, daily disposable, substantial equivalence, CooperVision ClearSight™ 1 Day SCL

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
stenfilcon A contact lens
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Randomized to stenfilcon A contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode
Arm Title
ocufilcon B contact lens
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Randomized to ocufilcon B contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
stenfilcon A contact lens
Intervention Description
Randomized to stenfilcon A contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ocufilcon B contact lens
Other Intervention Name(s)
CooperVision ClearSight™ 1 Day
Intervention Description
Daily disposable contact lens worn in a daily wear, daily disposable mode
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Objective Assessment: Ocular Response - Biomicroscopy
Description
The primary safety endpoint are the objective slit lamp findings associated with the stenfilcon A contact lenses compared with those same findings reported as associated with the ocufilcon B contact lenses. The incidence of biomicroscopy findings (0=not present, 4=severe) over the duration of the study with the highest reported grade was chosen for each unique eye. Biomicroscopy measurements were obtained at Baseline (baseline visit) and All Follow-Ups (week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit combined).The average grade for unique eyes with findings greater than 0 (none) is compared.
Time Frame
Change from baseline visit and all follow-ups visits
Title
Comparison of Objective Findings - Number of Adverse Events in Unique Eyes
Description
The primary safety endpoint in this evaluation will be a comparison of the objective findings of the number of adverse events in unique eyes associated with the stenfilcon A contact lenses compared with those same findings as associated with ocufilcon B contact lenses. The number of adverse events over the duration of the study was reported for each unique eye (bilateral or unilateral). Observations for adverse events were reported for any occurrence after dispensing (dispensing visit) through end of month 3 visit (month 3 visit).
Time Frame
Any occurrence from dispensing to month 3 visit
Title
Comparison of Objective Findings for Contact Lens Visual Acuities - Snellen 20/25 VA or Better
Description
The primary efficacy endpoint are the contact lens Snellen visual acuities (VA) of 20/25 VA or better associated with stenfilcon A compared with those same visual acuities associated with ocufilcon B. Snellen visual acuity (VA) examinations were performed at All Follow-up visits (week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit). The combined results of All Follow-up visits are compared.
Time Frame
week 1 visit, week 2 visit, month 1 visit, month 2 visit combined
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjective Assessment of Contact Lens Comfort - No Symptoms of Discomfort
Description
The secondary efficacy endpoint is the subjective assessment of contact lens comfort associated with the stenfilcon A contact lens compared with the comfort associated with the ocufilcon B contact lens. Subjective comfort assessment is related by the percent number of unique eyes that were reported to have no symptoms of discomfort (0=no symtoms reported) graded on a severity scale of the reported symptoms (0=no symptoms reported, 4=severe) that was experienced over the past month prior to baseline at the baseline visit (Baseline) and any symptoms of discomfort that was experienced since the previous study visit at each scheduled follow-up visit (Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
Title
Evaluation of Average Lens Wearing Time - Average Daily Hours Worn
Description
The secondary efficacy endpoint is the objective assessment of the lens average daily wearing times associated with the stenfilcon A compared with the lens average wearing times with the ocufilcon B contact lens. Objective average daily lens wearing time is measured in reported hours worn with the subject's habitual contact lenses recorded at baseline and after dispensing of study lenses recorded at Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Prior to being considered eligible to participate in this study, each subject MUST: Be at least 18 years of age as of the date of evaluation for the study. Have: Read the Informed Consent been given an explanation of the Informed Consent indicated understanding of the Informed Consent signed the Informed Consent document. Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and able to keep all specified appointments. Be an adapted, current full-time silicone hydrogel or soft contact lens wearer. An adapted full-time wearer is defined as wearing contact lenses on a daily basis for at least 8 hours per day for at least one month prior to participation in the study. Possess wearable and visually functional eyeglasses. Be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge. Require spectacle lens powers between -1.00 and -6.00 diopters sphere with no more than 1.00 diopter of refractive astigmatism and be willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes. Have manifest refraction Snellen visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than 20/25 in each eye. Upon completing the fitting process with the lenses to be worn in the study, have contact lens Snellen VA equal to or better than 20/30 in each eye. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects may not be enrolled in this study if any of the following apply: The subject is/has: Wearing lenses in a monovision modality and is unwilling to be fit with distance lenses in both eyes. NOTE: Subjects may not wear lenses in a monovision modality at any time during the study as it will interfere with the visual acuity analysis. Poor personal hygiene. Any active participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to this study. Currently pregnant (to the best of the subject's knowledge), is lactating or is planning a pregnancy within the next 3 months. A member, relative or household member of the investigator or of the investigational office staff. Has a known sensitivity to ingredients used in the over the counter contact lens lubricants approved for use in the study. Previous refractive surgery; or current or previous orthokeratology treatment. Is aphakic or psuedophakic. Ocular or systemic disease such as, but not limited to: anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present), glaucoma, Sjögren's syndrome, lupus erythematosus, sclerodermia, keratoconus or type II diabetes. The need for topical ocular medications or any medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would require the lenses to be removed during the day. The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures. A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates or fungal infections. A history of papillary conjunctivitis that has interfered with contact lens wear. Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear, including but not limited to: Pathological dry eye or associated dry eye symptoms with decreased tear levels and punctuate staining > Grade 2 Pterygium Corneal scars within the visual axis Neovascularization or ghost vessels > 1.0 mm in from the limbus Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) of > Grade 2 Anterior uveitis or iritis Seborrheic eczema, seborrheic conjunctivitis or blepharitis To be eligible to be randomized for study product a subject must have ALL of the Inclusion Criteria and have NONE of the exclusion criteria present. To be eligible for lens dispensing (either Test or Control), the subject's study lens contact lens visual acuity must be equal to or better than 20/30 in each eye.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Byrnes, OD
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lee Rigel, OD
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mary Jo Stiegemeier, OD
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Van Hoven, OD
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric White, OD
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Eric M. White, OD, Inc.
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vision Care Associates
City
East Lansing
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48823
Country
United States
Facility Name
Western Reserve Vision Care
City
Beachwood
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.
City
Brentwood
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37027
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Evaluation of Stenfilcon A Soft Contact Lens When Compared to Ocufilcon B Soft Contact Lens

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs