search
Back to results

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoablation for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases

Primary Purpose

Pain, Neoplasm Metastasis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cryoablation
Sponsored by
Boston Scientific Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Pain focused on measuring Painful bone metastases, Bone metastases, Metastatic bone tumors, Metastatic bone pain, Cryoablation, Cryotherapy, Cryosurgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Metastatic bone disease with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy; or Metastatic bone disease previously confirmed on imaging [e.g. computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] with known (biopsied) primary disease (primary bone cancer is excluded)
  • Current analgesic therapies have failed OR the subject is experiencing intolerable side effects
  • Unremitting pain that resulted in a return visit to the oncologist. The 'worst pain' in the last 24 hours must be reported to be 4 or above on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as subject can imagine) despite pharmaceutical pain management
  • Pain must be from one or two painful metastatic sites in the bone that is amenable to cryoablation with CT or MRI (additional less painful metastatic sites may be present)
  • Pain from the reported one or two metastatic sites must correlate with an identifiable tumor on CT, MRI, or ultrasound (US) imaging
  • Tumors must be suitable for cryoablation
  • Cryoablation should be performed within 14 days of baseline evaluations
  • Stable use of hormonal therapy (no changes within 4 weeks prior to the cryoablation procedure)
  • Stable use of pain medications (no changes within 2 weeks prior to the cryoablation procedure)
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale performance status 0-3
  • Life expectancy ≥ 2 months
  • Platelet count >50,000/mm³ within 6 weeks screening
  • INR (International Normalized Ratio) <1.5 within 6 weeks screening
  • No debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment and follow-up
  • If taking antiplatelet or anticoagulation medication, it must be able to be discontinued prior to the procedure for an appropriate amount of time (e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen, low molecular weight heparin preparations)
  • Clinically suitable for cryoablation therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma
  • Tumor involves a weight-bearing long bone of the lower extremity with the tumor causing > 50% loss of cortical bone
  • Has undergone prior ablation treatment of the index tumor
  • Prior radiation therapy of the index tumor <3 weeks prior to screening
  • Index tumor causing clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression/effacement
  • Anticipated treatment of the index tumor that would require iceball formation within 1.0 cm of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve structure, large abdominal vessel such as the aorta or inferior vena cava, bowel, or bladder
  • Surgery at the tumor site or surgery involving the cryoablation-treated tumor (index tumor)
  • Index tumor involves the skull (treatment of other painful tumors in subjects with skull tumors is not excluded)
  • Patient currently with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1000) within 6 weeks screening
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
  • Currently pregnant, nursing, or wishing to become pregnant during the study
  • Active, uncontrolled infection
  • Serious medical illness, including any of the following: uncontrolled congestive heart failure, uncontrolled angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event within 6 months prior to study entry
  • Concurrent participation in other experimental studies that could affect the primary endpoint

Sites / Locations

  • Karmanos Cancer Institute
  • University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of British Columbia
  • University Hospital of Strasbourg

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Cryoablation

Arm Description

All subjects will have cryoablation on one or two painful metastatic bone tumors.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference in worst pain scores
The endpoint for this study will be measured as follows: assessment of the effectiveness of cryoablation associated with palliation of pain in subjects with metastatic bone cancer by measuring the average difference of pre- and posttreatment worst pain in 24 hours from baseline to 24 hour, 1, 4, 12, and 24 week follow-up intervals as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cryoablation retreatments
If the first cryoablation procedure effectively relieves pain but the relief wears off over time and the pain becomes unbearable, a second procedure may be performed. The number of repeat cryoablation treatments will be recorded.
Additional surgical treatments other than cryoablation
If pain is not effectively relieved by the cryoablation, other surgical treatments may be performed. The number of these treatments will be recorded.
Reduced analgesic usage
The number of subjects (percentage) who are able to reduce analgesic medications from baseline to 24 hours, 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after cryoablation will be recorded.
Time to maximal palliation of pain after cryoablation
The difference in pain scores will be assessed from baseline to follow-up intervals after cryoablation will be analyzed. The interval indicating the most relief from pain will be compared across subjects.
Subject satisfaction with the amount palliation of pain obtained from cryoablation
Subject satisfaction will be compared at baseline to follow-up intervals.
Number of adverse events
The safety endpoint for this study is to assess the incidence and severity of intra-operative events, post operative adverse events, serious adverse events and unanticipated adverse device effects related to the cryoablation procedure.
Difference in average pain scores
Difference in average pain scores from baseline to 24 hours, 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after cryoablation as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 BPI scale
Time to recurrence of worst pain
Time to recurrence of worst pain at or above baseline; worst pain score in the 24 week follow-up period as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 BPI scale

Full Information

First Posted
October 25, 2011
Last Updated
July 15, 2021
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01461265
Brief Title
Safety and Efficacy of Cryoablation for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases
Official Title
Cryoablation for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy for relief of pain associated with metastatic bone tumors.
Detailed Description
Patients with painful bone metastases who meet the eligibility criteria and who have been determined to be an appropriate candidate for cryoablation therapy will be offered enrollment into the study. Cryoablation is the process of destroying tissue by the application of extremely cold temperatures. Galil Medical Cryoablation Systems are used as a surgical tool in the fields of general surgery, dermatology (skin), neurology (nerves), chest surgery (including lung), Ears-Nose-Throat (ENT), gynecology, oncology (cancer), proctology (colon/rectal) and urology (kidney). Patients agreeing to participate will read and sign an informed consent form and thus become subjects in the study. Treatment will be performed using a Galil Medical cryoablation system and Galil Medical cryoablation needles. Subjects will be followed for up to 24 weeks (6 months) for palliation of pain, quality of life and analgesic usage. Baseline and follow-up data will be collected for each subject via a web-based electronic data collection tool.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Neoplasm Metastasis
Keywords
Painful bone metastases, Bone metastases, Metastatic bone tumors, Metastatic bone pain, Cryoablation, Cryotherapy, Cryosurgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
29 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cryoablation
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All subjects will have cryoablation on one or two painful metastatic bone tumors.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Cryoablation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cryotherapy, Cryosurgery, Visual-ICE Cryoablation System, SeedNet Cryoablation System, PresIce Cryoablation System, IceRod Cryoablation Needle, IceRod PLUS Cryoablation Needle, IceEDGE 2.4 Cryoablation Needle, IceSeed Cryoablation Needle, IceSphere Cryoablation Needle
Intervention Description
For cryoablation in the palliation of painful bone metastases, subject preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management are identical to those of standard cryoablation routinely performed at all clinical centers participating in this study and are at the discretion of the investigator.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in worst pain scores
Description
The endpoint for this study will be measured as follows: assessment of the effectiveness of cryoablation associated with palliation of pain in subjects with metastatic bone cancer by measuring the average difference of pre- and posttreatment worst pain in 24 hours from baseline to 24 hour, 1, 4, 12, and 24 week follow-up intervals as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale.
Time Frame
24 weeks post-cryoablation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cryoablation retreatments
Description
If the first cryoablation procedure effectively relieves pain but the relief wears off over time and the pain becomes unbearable, a second procedure may be performed. The number of repeat cryoablation treatments will be recorded.
Time Frame
24 weeks post-cryoablation
Title
Additional surgical treatments other than cryoablation
Description
If pain is not effectively relieved by the cryoablation, other surgical treatments may be performed. The number of these treatments will be recorded.
Time Frame
24 weeks post-cryoablation
Title
Reduced analgesic usage
Description
The number of subjects (percentage) who are able to reduce analgesic medications from baseline to 24 hours, 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after cryoablation will be recorded.
Time Frame
24 weeks post-cryoablation
Title
Time to maximal palliation of pain after cryoablation
Description
The difference in pain scores will be assessed from baseline to follow-up intervals after cryoablation will be analyzed. The interval indicating the most relief from pain will be compared across subjects.
Time Frame
24 weeks post-cryoablation
Title
Subject satisfaction with the amount palliation of pain obtained from cryoablation
Description
Subject satisfaction will be compared at baseline to follow-up intervals.
Time Frame
24 weeks post-cryoablation
Title
Number of adverse events
Description
The safety endpoint for this study is to assess the incidence and severity of intra-operative events, post operative adverse events, serious adverse events and unanticipated adverse device effects related to the cryoablation procedure.
Time Frame
30 days post-cryoablation
Title
Difference in average pain scores
Description
Difference in average pain scores from baseline to 24 hours, 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after cryoablation as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 BPI scale
Time Frame
24 weeks post-cryoablation
Title
Time to recurrence of worst pain
Description
Time to recurrence of worst pain at or above baseline; worst pain score in the 24 week follow-up period as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 BPI scale
Time Frame
24 weks post-cryoablation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years of age or older Metastatic bone disease with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy; or Metastatic bone disease previously confirmed on imaging [e.g. computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] with known (biopsied) primary disease (primary bone cancer is excluded) Current analgesic therapies have failed OR the subject is experiencing intolerable side effects Unremitting pain that resulted in a return visit to the oncologist. The 'worst pain' in the last 24 hours must be reported to be 4 or above on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as subject can imagine) despite pharmaceutical pain management Pain must be from one or two painful metastatic sites in the bone that is amenable to cryoablation with CT or MRI (additional less painful metastatic sites may be present) Pain from the reported one or two metastatic sites must correlate with an identifiable tumor on CT, MRI, or ultrasound (US) imaging Tumors must be suitable for cryoablation Cryoablation should be performed within 14 days of baseline evaluations Stable use of hormonal therapy (no changes within 4 weeks prior to the cryoablation procedure) Stable use of pain medications (no changes within 2 weeks prior to the cryoablation procedure) ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale performance status 0-3 Life expectancy ≥ 2 months Platelet count >50,000/mm³ within 6 weeks screening INR (International Normalized Ratio) <1.5 within 6 weeks screening No debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment and follow-up If taking antiplatelet or anticoagulation medication, it must be able to be discontinued prior to the procedure for an appropriate amount of time (e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen, low molecular weight heparin preparations) Clinically suitable for cryoablation therapy Exclusion Criteria: Leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma Tumor involves a weight-bearing long bone of the lower extremity with the tumor causing > 50% loss of cortical bone Has undergone prior ablation treatment of the index tumor Prior radiation therapy of the index tumor <3 weeks prior to screening Index tumor causing clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression/effacement Anticipated treatment of the index tumor that would require iceball formation within 1.0 cm of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve structure, large abdominal vessel such as the aorta or inferior vena cava, bowel, or bladder Surgery at the tumor site or surgery involving the cryoablation-treated tumor (index tumor) Index tumor involves the skull (treatment of other painful tumors in subjects with skull tumors is not excluded) Patient currently with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1000) within 6 weeks screening Uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders Currently pregnant, nursing, or wishing to become pregnant during the study Active, uncontrolled infection Serious medical illness, including any of the following: uncontrolled congestive heart failure, uncontrolled angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event within 6 months prior to study entry Concurrent participation in other experimental studies that could affect the primary endpoint
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jerry Matteo, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Shands Medical Center, Jacksonville, FL
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of British Columbia
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 1L8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University Hospital of Strasbourg
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
F-67091
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17057075
Citation
Callstrom MR, Atwell TD, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Welch TJ, Maus TP, Wong GY, Brown KJ. Painful metastases involving bone: percutaneous image-guided cryoablation--prospective trial interim analysis. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):572-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051247.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11110597
Citation
Coleman RE. Management of bone metastases. Oncologist. 2000;5(6):463-70. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-6-463.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14722039
Citation
Goetz MP, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Welch TJ, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Petersen IA, Beres RA, Regge D, Capanna R, Saker MB, Gronemeyer DH, Gevargez A, Ahrar K, Choti MA, de Baere TJ, Rubin J. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):300-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.097.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12091666
Citation
Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Lewis BD, Welch TJ, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Lee RA, Reading CC, Petersen IA, Pickett DD. Painful metastases involving bone: feasibility of percutaneous CT- and US-guided radio-frequency ablation. Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):87-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011613.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16598666
Citation
Simon CJ, Dupuy DE. Percutaneous minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of bone tumors: thermal ablation. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2006 Jun;10(2):137-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939031. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18054665
Citation
Ullrick SR, Hebert JJ, Davis KW. Cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;37(1):39-48. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.05.001.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoablation for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs