search
Back to results

Drug-induced Xerostomia. Evaluation of Malic Acid 1%, Salivary Mucins and Buffering Capacity

Primary Purpose

Xerostomia, Depression, Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Malic Acid
Placebo
Sponsored by
Universidad de Granada
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Xerostomia focused on measuring Xerostomia, Antidepressant agents, Antihypertensive agents

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Xerostomia
  • Drug consumption
  • Antidepressant and antihypertensive agents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic diseases
  • Head and neck radiotherapy
  • Intake of drugs with high xerostomizing capacity

Sites / Locations

  • Dental School

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Malic Acid 1%

Control

Arm Description

Intervention group subjects was the delivery to the patients of a topical sialogogue, containing 1% malic acid, xylitol 10% and fluoride 0.05%(Xeros Dentaid Spray©, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain). Spray was transferred by foreign personnel into identical opaque flasks(without any brand name)labeled A.

Control group was given a placebo with opaque flask(without any brand name)labeled B and with the same presentation and composition than Experimental group (excepting 1% malic acid).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ)
Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) was used in order to obtain subjective information about the severity of xerostomia before and after treatment with malic acid/placebo. Every participant answered an initial questionnaire (DMQ 1) about the symptoms related to oral dryness, before receiving a spray (1% malic acid or placebo). After two weeks of applications, patients had to answer DMQ 1 again as well as an additional questionnaire (DMQ 2) about the efficacy of the sprays. Increased DMQ scores indicate improvement of xerostomia. DMQ 1 was used to assess the initial severity of oral dryness and in particular its impact on oral function: problems when chewing, swallowing, speaking and general impact on daily life. DMQ 1 used a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = "very dry" and 4 = "not dry at all." After two weeks of treatment, DMQ 1 was repeated and it was included DMQ 2. At the end values of DMQ 1 and DMQ 2 were summed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Sialometries
Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were assessed in all patients. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was obtained by the spit method every 30 seconds for 15 minutes. Saliva was collected in 20 mL plastic containers, which were pre-weighted. Stimulated whole saliva was obtained by chewing a 1 g piece of paraffin wax for six minutes. Saliva collected during the first minute was discarded, and then collected into the container every 30 seconds.

Full Information

First Posted
July 20, 2012
Last Updated
April 4, 2016
Sponsor
Universidad de Granada
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01652001
Brief Title
Drug-induced Xerostomia. Evaluation of Malic Acid 1%, Salivary Mucins and Buffering Capacity
Official Title
Effectiveness of Malic Acid 1% in Patients With Xerostomia Induced by Drugs. Determination of Salivary Mucins and Buffering Capacity
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad de Granada
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a topical sialogogue spray containing 1% malic acid on patients affected by xerostomia caused by drugs. This research took the form of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial at Faculty of Dentistry of University of Granada (Spain). Participants with antidepressant-induced and antihypertensive-induce xerostomia were divided into two groups: for the first 'intervention group' a topical sialogogue spray (1% malic acid) was applied, while for the second 'control group', a placebo spray was applied; for both groups the sprays were applied on demand during two weeks. The Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) was used to evaluate xerostomia levels before and after product/placebo application. Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flows rates, before and after application, were measured.
Detailed Description
- Patients and study Design The study was approved by the University of Granada Research Ethics Committee (Spain). All measurements and interventions were undertaken with the understanding and written consent of each participant according to Helsinki II Agreement.The study was designed as a double-blind randomized clinical trial following guidelines established by The Consort Statement (http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/). All study participants were recruited from the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Granada (Spain)at Drug Interactions in Dentistry clinical practice, between September and December 2011. Recruitment was supervised by research assistants. All participants had a full medical history and saliva samples were collected at the Faculty of Dentistry of University of Granada (Spain) at the Pharmacological Investigation in Dentistry Research Group laboratory (CTS-654). Sample size determination was based on the standard deviation of the main variable: the Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ)was tested to determine the minimum sample size necessary to reliably confirm the hypothesis that a topical 1% malic acid sialogogue spray, combined with xylitol and fluoride, is effective for the treatment of xerostomia induced by antidepressant drugs over a two-week period. DMQ and saliva collection were measured the same day and by the same investigator. Clinical Intervention Once the participants had signed the informed consent form and anamnesis had been carried out, the following question was asked to every patient: "How often do you feel dry mouth?" Available answers were: "never", "sometimes", "usually" or "always." Those who answered "usually" or "always" were considered as suffering from xerostomia. Our clinical intervention among the intervention group subjects was the delivery to the patients of a topical sialogogue, containing 1% malic acid, xylitol 10% and fluoride0.05%(Xeros Dentaid Spray©, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain) for two weeks, whereas a control group was given a placebo with the same presentation and composition (excepting 1% malic acid). Randomization was performed using the website http://www.randomization.com, obtaining a randomization plan, which assigned participants to either the intervention group or the control group. This randomization plan was delivered to a person unrelated to the study in order to prevent both participants and researchers from identifying the product.Both sprays were transferred by foreign personnel into two identical opaque flasks(without any brand name)labeled A and B containing respectively, either 1% malic acid or placebo.A code for randomization was kept in an opaque envelope in a safe environment and opened only at the end of the study. Data were analyzed by a third party blinded to the allocation results. 1% malic acid/placebo sprays were applied on demand, with a maximum of eight doses per day. No participants left the trial. Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) The DMQ, developed by Vissink et al., Gravenmade et al., van der Reijden et al. and Regelink et al. was used in order to obtain subjective information about the severity of xerostomia before and after treatment with malic acid/placebo. Every participant answered an initial questionnaire (DMQ 1) about the symptoms related to oral dryness, before receiving a spray (1% malic acid or placebo). After two weeks of applications, patients had to answer DMQ 1 again as well as an additional questionnaire (DMQ 2) about the efficacy of the sprays. Increased DMQ scores indicate improvement of xerostomia. DMQ 1 was used to assess the initial severity of oral dryness and in particular its impact on oral function: problems when chewing, swallowing, speaking and general impact on daily life. DMQ 1 used a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = "very dry" and 4 = "not dry at all." After two weeks of treatment, DMQ 1 was repeated. DMQ 2 was designed to assess the impact of the spray on the symptoms of xerostomia, and was also based on a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = frequent restriction of oral function and 4= no restriction of oral function/no feeling of oral dryness. The effect of the frequency and duration of spray applications in the oral cavity were also registered. - Sialometries As secondary measurements, both unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were assessed in all patients. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was obtained by the spit method every 30 seconds for 15 minutes. Saliva was collected in 20 mL plastic containers, which were pre-weighted (in 0.001 g) using a precision scale. Measurements were expressed as mL/min. Stimulated whole saliva was obtained by chewing a 1 g piece of paraffin wax for six minutes. Saliva collected during the first minute was discarded, and then collected into the container every 30 seconds. Both DMQ and sialometries were always assessed at the same time of day (from 09:00 to 11:00 a.m.) to avoid any circadian variation. Before the evaluation, participants were asked not to eat, drink, smoke or brush their teeth for one hour prior to their appointment at the clinic.Time passed between the last use of the sialogogue and the salivary flow measurements was 6 hours.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Xerostomia, Depression, Hypertension
Keywords
Xerostomia, Antidepressant agents, Antihypertensive agents

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
185 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Malic Acid 1%
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention group subjects was the delivery to the patients of a topical sialogogue, containing 1% malic acid, xylitol 10% and fluoride 0.05%(Xeros Dentaid Spray©, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain). Spray was transferred by foreign personnel into identical opaque flasks(without any brand name)labeled A.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Control group was given a placebo with opaque flask(without any brand name)labeled B and with the same presentation and composition than Experimental group (excepting 1% malic acid).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Malic Acid
Other Intervention Name(s)
XerosDentaid Spray, Flask labeled A
Intervention Description
Oral spray for application into the oral cavity
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Flask labeled B
Intervention Description
Oral spray for application into the oral cavity
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ)
Description
Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) was used in order to obtain subjective information about the severity of xerostomia before and after treatment with malic acid/placebo. Every participant answered an initial questionnaire (DMQ 1) about the symptoms related to oral dryness, before receiving a spray (1% malic acid or placebo). After two weeks of applications, patients had to answer DMQ 1 again as well as an additional questionnaire (DMQ 2) about the efficacy of the sprays. Increased DMQ scores indicate improvement of xerostomia. DMQ 1 was used to assess the initial severity of oral dryness and in particular its impact on oral function: problems when chewing, swallowing, speaking and general impact on daily life. DMQ 1 used a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = "very dry" and 4 = "not dry at all." After two weeks of treatment, DMQ 1 was repeated and it was included DMQ 2. At the end values of DMQ 1 and DMQ 2 were summed
Time Frame
2 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sialometries
Description
Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were assessed in all patients. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was obtained by the spit method every 30 seconds for 15 minutes. Saliva was collected in 20 mL plastic containers, which were pre-weighted. Stimulated whole saliva was obtained by chewing a 1 g piece of paraffin wax for six minutes. Saliva collected during the first minute was discarded, and then collected into the container every 30 seconds.
Time Frame
2 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Xerostomia Drug consumption Antidepressant and antihypertensive agents Exclusion Criteria: Systemic diseases Head and neck radiotherapy Intake of drugs with high xerostomizing capacity
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerardo Gómez-Moreno, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Universidad de Granada
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dental School
City
Granada
ZIP/Postal Code
18071
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Drug-induced Xerostomia. Evaluation of Malic Acid 1%, Salivary Mucins and Buffering Capacity

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs