Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures
Primary Purpose
Trauma
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Screw fixation
TightRope
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Trauma focused on measuring ankle; fracture; syndesmosis;
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- AO/OTA Weber C ankle fracture, operation within 7 days from the injury
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral or previous ankle fracture, tibial shaft fracture, diabetes wiht polyneuropathy, inadequate co-operation
Sites / Locations
- Oulu University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Screw fixation
TightRope
Arm Description
3,5mm fully threaded cortical screw transfixation of syndesmosis
TightRope transfixation of syndesmosis
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Malreduction of the tibiofibular joint in the intraoperative computed tomography
Malreduction in the tibiofibular joint is assessed post op from the intraoperative computed tomography. Both ankles are imaged and difference at least 2 mm is assessed to be significant
Secondary Outcome Measures
Clinical outcome one year after the injury
Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 2-year of follow-up.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01742650
Brief Title
Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures
Official Title
Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures. A Prospective Randomized Study.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Oulu
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of our study is to compare two different syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fractures. Our hypothesis is that 50% of screw fixed fibulas but only 5% of suture-button fixed fibulas are in malposition. All skeletally mature patients (16 years or older) with AO/OTA Weber C type fractures operated within a week after trauma are consecutively included into the study. The tibiofibular transfixation is randomly performed either by a 3,5 mm tricortical screw or a suture-button (TightRope). Malposition of the tibiofibular joint is assessed in an intraoperative computed tomography. Clinical outcome is assessed by using Olerud-Molander, RAND ja 36-Item Healt Survey after 1-year from the injury.
Detailed Description
The aim of our study is to compare two different syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fractures. Screw fixation is widely and mostly used transfixation but suture-button is also shown to be a biomechanically stable and probably more physiologic transfication method. It is shown that even 50 % of the syndesmosis srews and thus fibulas are in malposition. With more physiologic suture-button transfixation this malposition is thought to be less commmon. There is no studies comparing screw and suture-button syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fracture patients.
Our hypothesis is that 50% of screw fixed fibulas but only 5% of suture-button fixed fibulas are in malposition assessed in the intraoperative computed tomography. Malposition is assessed to present if difference between fractured and non-fractured side is at least 2 mm in the tibiofibular joint. Thus, the sample size is assessed to be 19 patients per group (alpha=0.05, Beta=0.2, 20% drop out).
All skeletally mature patients (16 years or older) with AO/OTA Weber C type fractures operated within a week after trauma are included into the study. Exclusion criteria are previous ankle fracture, concomitant tibial fracture, diabetes with peripheral neuropathy, pathological fracture or inadequate co-operation.
After bony fixation the tibiofibular transfixation is randomly performed either by a 3,5 mm tricortical screw or a suture-button (TightRope). An intraoperative computed tomography is imaged from the both ankles of all patients. The operation is continued with six weeks casting without weight-bearing.
Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 1-year of follow-up.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Trauma
Keywords
ankle; fracture; syndesmosis;
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Screw fixation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
3,5mm fully threaded cortical screw transfixation of syndesmosis
Arm Title
TightRope
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
TightRope transfixation of syndesmosis
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Screw fixation
Intervention Description
3,5mm fully threaded cortical screw transfixation of syndesmosis
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TightRope
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tightrope Arthrex
Intervention Description
TightRope transfixation of syndesmosis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Malreduction of the tibiofibular joint in the intraoperative computed tomography
Description
Malreduction in the tibiofibular joint is assessed post op from the intraoperative computed tomography. Both ankles are imaged and difference at least 2 mm is assessed to be significant
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical outcome one year after the injury
Description
Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 2-year of follow-up.
Time Frame
2 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
AO/OTA Weber C ankle fracture, operation within 7 days from the injury
Exclusion Criteria:
Bilateral or previous ankle fracture, tibial shaft fracture, diabetes wiht polyneuropathy, inadequate co-operation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tero HJ Kortekangas, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Oulu University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oulu University Hospital
City
Oulu
ZIP/Postal Code
90029
Country
Finland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25769201
Citation
Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkila T, Lepojarvi S, Nortunen S, Ohtonen P, Katisko J, Pakarinen H. A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs