Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment (SIOver)
Primary Purpose
Mouth, Edentulous
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Single implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Mouth, Edentulous focused on measuring Mandibular Prosthesis Implantation, Prostheses and Implants, Denture, Complete, Lower
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fully edentulous patients
- Need of replacement of the mandibular denture or patient without mandibular denture
- Patients with poor adaptation to the mandibular denture
- Patients with good general health
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who refuse to receive a conventional dentures opposed to a mandibular overdenture retained by a single implant
- Patients with local intraoral diseases that influence denture stability, retention and adaptation of the lower denture (such as changes or anatomical deformations of the jaws, mucosal changes caused by fungi and bacteria, tumor changes and absolute xerostomia)
- Patients with systemic, psychological or neurological diseases that preclude or hinder oral movements of the patient for clinical care and/or clinical follow-up in all stages of the research
- Patients who choose other treatment modalities not covered by the study
- Patients with alcoholism or other severe behavioral disorders that compromise their participation in the study
Sites / Locations
- School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Conventional implant loading protocol
Immediate loading implant protocol
Arm Description
Single implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Single implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Oral health-related quality of life impacts
Oral health related quality of life impacts were measured using the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous subjects (Souza et al., 2007; Souza et al., 2010), considering the overall scale and its four different scale domains: masticatory discomfort and disability (four items), (2) psychological discomfort and disability (five items), social disability (five items) and oral pain and discomfort (five items).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Satisfaction with dentures
Satisfaction with dentures measured using the patients' ratings of the overall satisfaction with the mandibular denture, and satisfaction with comfort, stability, esthetics, ability to speak, and ability to chew. All satisfaction items will be measured on a 10-point visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01801566
First Posted
February 25, 2013
Last Updated
March 14, 2016
Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Goias
Collaborators
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01801566
Brief Title
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
Acronym
SIOver
Official Title
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment: Radiographic Evaluations, Patient's Satisfaction, and Oral-health-related Quality of Life
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Goias
Collaborators
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the treatment with single implant overdenture for the edentulous mandible. The investigators hypothesize that treatment with lower overdenture retained by a single implant appears to have satisfactory effectiveness as a treatment for patients with specific conditions (such as maladaptive patients), with the advantages of simplicity and greater immediate benefits when compared to the conventional full denture, improving the retention and stability of the denture and better oral-related quality of life.
Detailed Description
This study is a longitudinal evaluation of clinical and patient-reported outcomes related to the single-implant mandibular overdenture treatment. Sixty completely edentulous individuals will be included. First, new complete dentures will be fabricated for all of them. Panoramic radiographs and conventional tomograms of the mandibular midline region will be obtained in order to plan the implant placement surgery. After the adaptation period related to the use of the new dentures, a single implant (Titamax IT Cortical, Neodent, Curitiba, Brazil) will be installed in the mandibular midline of all participants. According to the primary stability obtained in the implant placement patients will be treated with an immediate loading protocol when achieving torque of at least 30 Ncm and implant stability quotient (ISQ) of at least 60. In cases of values below cited, conventional loading protocol will be adopted. Ball O-ring will be used as the attachment system for the mandibular overdenture. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be collected after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the installation of the overdentures.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mouth, Edentulous
Keywords
Mandibular Prosthesis Implantation, Prostheses and Implants, Denture, Complete, Lower
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Conventional implant loading protocol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Single implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Arm Title
Immediate loading implant protocol
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Single implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Single implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Intervention Description
60 patients treated with single implant retained complete mandibular denture (overdenture) opposed to a conventional maxillary denture, allocated into 2 experimental groups according to the implant loading protocol (conventional and immediate), evaluated at baseline and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Oral health-related quality of life impacts
Description
Oral health related quality of life impacts were measured using the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous subjects (Souza et al., 2007; Souza et al., 2010), considering the overall scale and its four different scale domains: masticatory discomfort and disability (four items), (2) psychological discomfort and disability (five items), social disability (five items) and oral pain and discomfort (five items).
Time Frame
Change from baseline on oral health-related quality of life impacts at 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Satisfaction with dentures
Description
Satisfaction with dentures measured using the patients' ratings of the overall satisfaction with the mandibular denture, and satisfaction with comfort, stability, esthetics, ability to speak, and ability to chew. All satisfaction items will be measured on a 10-point visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10
Time Frame
Change from baseline on satisfaction with dentures at 12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Primary stability
Description
Measures of the implant stability: stability quotient index and final insertion torque
Time Frame
Changes from baseline on primary stability of implants at 12 months
Title
Crestal bone loss
Description
Periimplant alveolar bone height of the crestal bone level
Time Frame
Changes from baseline on crestal bone loss at 12 months
Title
Bone density around the implant
Description
Periimplant bone density measured by digital subtraction radiography
Time Frame
Changes from baseline on bone density around the implant at 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Fully edentulous patients
Need of replacement of the mandibular denture or patient without mandibular denture
Patients with poor adaptation to the mandibular denture
Patients with good general health
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who refuse to receive a conventional dentures opposed to a mandibular overdenture retained by a single implant
Patients with local intraoral diseases that influence denture stability, retention and adaptation of the lower denture (such as changes or anatomical deformations of the jaws, mucosal changes caused by fungi and bacteria, tumor changes and absolute xerostomia)
Patients with systemic, psychological or neurological diseases that preclude or hinder oral movements of the patient for clinical care and/or clinical follow-up in all stages of the research
Patients who choose other treatment modalities not covered by the study
Patients with alcoholism or other severe behavioral disorders that compromise their participation in the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudio R Leles, DDS, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universidade Federal de Goias
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias
City
Goiania
State/Province
Goias
ZIP/Postal Code
74605-220
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Links:
URL
http://cnpq.br/
Description
Website of the Main study sponsor
Learn more about this trial
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs