search
Back to results

Feasibility Study of Geko vs. IPCs in Trauma (GIFT Pilot)

Primary Purpose

Trauma, Venous Thromboembolism

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
geko
IPCs
Sponsored by
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Trauma focused on measuring venous thromboembolism, trauma, mechanical methods of prophylaxis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of trauma, meeting criteria for referral to the HHS trauma service - ANY of the following (1-3):

    1. patient with obvious major injuries in two or more systems, each requiring a specialist and inpatient care
    2. spinal injury with paraplegia or tetraplegia; severe penetrating injury to the head, neck, trunk or groin; amputation above the wrist or ankle; burns, second or third degree, involving 20% or more body surface area, or involving the face or genitalia
    3. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than or equal to 10, as a result of trauma or any two of:

      • significant decrease in level of consciousness
      • pulse < 50 or > 120
      • BP < 80 or absent radial pulse
      • Respiratory rate < 10 or > 24
  • Subject admitted to the Hamilton General Hospital ICU or the hospital ward step-down units
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation expected to last for more than 3 days. Contraindication to anticoagulation may include intracranial hemorrhage, ocular injury with associated hemorrhage, solid intra-abdominal organ injury (i.e. liver, spleen, kidney), and/or pelvic or retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfusion. [12] The final determination of whether anticoagulant prophylaxis is contraindicated will be made by the treating physician.
  • Projected hospitalization greater than 3 days (as determined by treating physician)
  • Informed consent can be provided by the subject or substitute decision maker within 48 hours of admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to wear either IPCs or gekoTM on both legs, including but not limited to:

    • unstable fracture of the lower extremity;
    • compartment syndrome of the lower extremity;
    • skin breakdown affecting the area on which the devices will be applied;
    • prior amputation affecting the area on which the devices will be applied;
    • severe peripheral ischemic vascular disease;
    • uncontrolled bleeding of the lower extremity;
  • Diagnosis of DVT within 1 month prior to assessment for enrollment
  • Use of anticoagulant medication within 24h of enrollment (except when used solely as a flush for intravenous catheters), or ongoing effect of anticoagulant medication at time of enrollment as determined by history of medication use and laboratory evidence of medication effect. For the purposes of this study, anticoagulant medications include:

    • unfractionated heparin (intravenous or subcutaneous)
    • low molecular weight heparin
    • fondaparinux
    • dabigatran
    • rivaroxaban
    • warfarin
    • argatroban
    • danaparoid
    • lepirudin
  • Leg circumference greater than 24 inches at the location the gekoTM device would be secured to the leg.
  • Presence of cardiac demand pacemaker

Sites / Locations

  • Hamilton General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

geko

IPCs

Arm Description

For subjects randomized to the experimental treatment arm, one gekoTM device will be applied to each leg according to the manufacturer's instructions by the subject's primary care nurse. All nurses applying the devices must be trained on proper application technique. The old devices will be removed and new devices applied daily. The subject will continue to use the devices until he or she exits the study.

The control treatment will consist of the hospital's standard IPC devices. The IPCs will be applied to each leg by the subject's primary care nurse according to the manufacturer's instructions. They will continue to be applied until exit from the study. At the time of withdrawal from the study, the decision regarding continued use of IPCs will be made by the treating physician.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of completing a larger, phase III trial with DVT incidence as primary outcome
This endpoint will be considered to have been met if, after enrollment of 40 subjects, both of the following conditions are met: i. the time from enrollment of the first subject to enrollment of the 40th subject is less than 18 months; AND ii. all secondary outcomes are evaluable for at least 80% of subjects.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Compliance
Study personnel will assess compliance. For subjects randomized to gekoTM, the subject will be considered compliant for the visit if: i) one gekoTM device is attached to each leg; AND ii) a muscle contraction caused by each device can be visualized with the subject's leg at rest; For subjects randomized to IPCs, the subject will be considered compliant for the visit if: i) one calf sleeve is affixed to each leg; AND ii) both sleeves are visibly inflating and deflating. A compliance statistic will be computed for each subject by dividing the number of compliant observations by the total number of observations. A mean value will be determined for each study arm. The means will be compared using a two-tailed Student's t-test with alpha = 0.05. The proportion of subjects with a compliance statistic of at least 80% will be calculated. The proportion of subjects with at least 80% compliance will be compared between study treatment arms using Fisher's exact test.
Development of venous thromboembolism
Development of VTE defined either by 1) a positive screening duplex ultrasound of the deep veins of the legs, or 2) an objectively verified clinical diagnosis of DVT and/or PE, established by patient's treating physician. The proportion of patients in each arm who develop VTE during the study will be calculated. The sample is projected to be too low to enable any further statistical comparison of efficacy in prevention of VTE.
Tolerability
The tolerability questionnaire will be administered by the research coordinator on the day of study exit. The proportion of subjects selecting each of the possible answers for each of the questions on the tolerability questionnaire will be computed for each study arm. Further statistical comparison between the groups will not be undertaken for the tolerability questionnaire, but the data will be used for hypothesis-generation regarding specific causes of increased or decreased tolerability between the devices.
Venous and arterial physiological flow
Mean values and standard error for each study arm will be computed for the volume flow and peak velocity in the superficial femoral vein and femoral artery using pulsed Doppler by duplex ultrasound. The values will be compared using a two-tailed Student's t-test (alpha = 0.05).

Full Information

First Posted
December 17, 2012
Last Updated
March 18, 2015
Sponsor
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01835990
Brief Title
Feasibility Study of Geko vs. IPCs in Trauma
Acronym
GIFT Pilot
Official Title
Feasibility Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Device vs. Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Trauma patients are at a high risk of developing blood clots in the legs (deep vein thrombosis - DVT), which can travel to the lungs and cause serious health consequences. Often, these patients cannot receive blood-thinning medication to prevent these blood clots because of the risk of bleeding; in this case, they are usually given intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs) to prevent blood clots. IPCs are inflatable sleeves that fit over the legs and periodically inflate and deflate, helping to pump blood out of the legs and thus reduce the risk of blood clot formation. Several studies suggest that IPCs are working properly on the patient only 60-70% of the time. Some patients also find them uncomfortable. A new device (geko) that works by stimulating the leg muscles and increasing blood flow in the legs has recently been developed. To compare the geko with IPCs, this study will randomly assign trauma patients who cannot receive blood thinners for blood clot prevention to either IPCs or geko. The main goal is to determine the feasibility of doing a larger study which would compare the efficacy of these devices in preventing blood clots. The amount of time the devices are properly used on the patients, comfort and tolerability, development of blood clots, and blood flow in the leg veins and arteries will also be measured and compared between the devices.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Trauma, Venous Thromboembolism
Keywords
venous thromboembolism, trauma, mechanical methods of prophylaxis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
geko
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
For subjects randomized to the experimental treatment arm, one gekoTM device will be applied to each leg according to the manufacturer's instructions by the subject's primary care nurse. All nurses applying the devices must be trained on proper application technique. The old devices will be removed and new devices applied daily. The subject will continue to use the devices until he or she exits the study.
Arm Title
IPCs
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control treatment will consist of the hospital's standard IPC devices. The IPCs will be applied to each leg by the subject's primary care nurse according to the manufacturer's instructions. They will continue to be applied until exit from the study. At the time of withdrawal from the study, the decision regarding continued use of IPCs will be made by the treating physician.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
geko
Other Intervention Name(s)
neuromuscular stimulation device
Intervention Description
The geko is a neuromuscular stimulation device that stimulates the common peroneal nerve resulting in contraction of the leg muscles and increased venous and arterial flow. It is Health Canada approved for prevention of deep venous thrombosis.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
IPCs
Other Intervention Name(s)
intermittent pneumatic compression devices, Arjo Huntleigh Flowtron
Intervention Description
devices that pneumatically compress the leg, resulting in increased venous blood flow.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of completing a larger, phase III trial with DVT incidence as primary outcome
Description
This endpoint will be considered to have been met if, after enrollment of 40 subjects, both of the following conditions are met: i. the time from enrollment of the first subject to enrollment of the 40th subject is less than 18 months; AND ii. all secondary outcomes are evaluable for at least 80% of subjects.
Time Frame
earliest of when 40th subject is enrolled or 18 months from study start
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compliance
Description
Study personnel will assess compliance. For subjects randomized to gekoTM, the subject will be considered compliant for the visit if: i) one gekoTM device is attached to each leg; AND ii) a muscle contraction caused by each device can be visualized with the subject's leg at rest; For subjects randomized to IPCs, the subject will be considered compliant for the visit if: i) one calf sleeve is affixed to each leg; AND ii) both sleeves are visibly inflating and deflating. A compliance statistic will be computed for each subject by dividing the number of compliant observations by the total number of observations. A mean value will be determined for each study arm. The means will be compared using a two-tailed Student's t-test with alpha = 0.05. The proportion of subjects with a compliance statistic of at least 80% will be calculated. The proportion of subjects with at least 80% compliance will be compared between study treatment arms using Fisher's exact test.
Time Frame
Twice daily (excluding weekends and holidays), until subject exits study
Title
Development of venous thromboembolism
Description
Development of VTE defined either by 1) a positive screening duplex ultrasound of the deep veins of the legs, or 2) an objectively verified clinical diagnosis of DVT and/or PE, established by patient's treating physician. The proportion of patients in each arm who develop VTE during the study will be calculated. The sample is projected to be too low to enable any further statistical comparison of efficacy in prevention of VTE.
Time Frame
At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Title
Tolerability
Description
The tolerability questionnaire will be administered by the research coordinator on the day of study exit. The proportion of subjects selecting each of the possible answers for each of the questions on the tolerability questionnaire will be computed for each study arm. Further statistical comparison between the groups will not be undertaken for the tolerability questionnaire, but the data will be used for hypothesis-generation regarding specific causes of increased or decreased tolerability between the devices.
Time Frame
At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Title
Venous and arterial physiological flow
Description
Mean values and standard error for each study arm will be computed for the volume flow and peak velocity in the superficial femoral vein and femoral artery using pulsed Doppler by duplex ultrasound. The values will be compared using a two-tailed Student's t-test (alpha = 0.05).
Time Frame
At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of trauma, meeting criteria for referral to the HHS trauma service - ANY of the following (1-3): patient with obvious major injuries in two or more systems, each requiring a specialist and inpatient care spinal injury with paraplegia or tetraplegia; severe penetrating injury to the head, neck, trunk or groin; amputation above the wrist or ankle; burns, second or third degree, involving 20% or more body surface area, or involving the face or genitalia Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than or equal to 10, as a result of trauma or any two of: significant decrease in level of consciousness pulse < 50 or > 120 BP < 80 or absent radial pulse Respiratory rate < 10 or > 24 Subject admitted to the Hamilton General Hospital ICU or the hospital ward step-down units Age 18 years or older Contraindication to anticoagulation expected to last for more than 3 days. Contraindication to anticoagulation may include intracranial hemorrhage, ocular injury with associated hemorrhage, solid intra-abdominal organ injury (i.e. liver, spleen, kidney), and/or pelvic or retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfusion. [12] The final determination of whether anticoagulant prophylaxis is contraindicated will be made by the treating physician. Projected hospitalization greater than 3 days (as determined by treating physician) Informed consent can be provided by the subject or substitute decision maker within 48 hours of admission Exclusion Criteria: Inability to wear either IPCs or gekoTM on both legs, including but not limited to: unstable fracture of the lower extremity; compartment syndrome of the lower extremity; skin breakdown affecting the area on which the devices will be applied; prior amputation affecting the area on which the devices will be applied; severe peripheral ischemic vascular disease; uncontrolled bleeding of the lower extremity; Diagnosis of DVT within 1 month prior to assessment for enrollment Use of anticoagulant medication within 24h of enrollment (except when used solely as a flush for intravenous catheters), or ongoing effect of anticoagulant medication at time of enrollment as determined by history of medication use and laboratory evidence of medication effect. For the purposes of this study, anticoagulant medications include: unfractionated heparin (intravenous or subcutaneous) low molecular weight heparin fondaparinux dabigatran rivaroxaban warfarin argatroban danaparoid lepirudin Leg circumference greater than 24 inches at the location the gekoTM device would be secured to the leg. Presence of cardiac demand pacemaker
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vinai C Bhagirath, MD FRCP(C)
Organizational Affiliation
McMaster University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hamilton General Hospital
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8L 2X2
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Feasibility Study of Geko vs. IPCs in Trauma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs