search
Back to results

Effects Job Rotation in the Prevention of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (Jobrotation)

Primary Purpose

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Job rotation
Guidelines ergonomics
Sponsored by
Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Musculoskeletal Diseases focused on measuring Occupational health, Ergonomics, Environments, Prevention and Control

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sectors workers with production lines that allow switching between different tasks and requests biomechanical exposure levels ergonomic risk. And work is carried out in production cells.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sector workers whose production lines are automated or semi-automated, possessing the pace of work determined by machinery and that the work stoppage is not possible.

Sites / Locations

  • Rosimeire Simprini Padula

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Job rotation

Guidelines Ergonomics

Arm Description

The intervention group will perform rotation function, switching between tasks with low, moderate and high ergonomic risk and different requests for ergonomic body region added to ergonomic guidelines.

Manual material handling Orientation posture Orientation furniture Orientation in general

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Decrease musculoskeletal absence from work.
Absence from work due to sick leave due to disease of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Secondary Outcome Measures

Decrease Musculoskeletal symptoms
Musculoskeletal symptoms (Nordic Questionnaire1 and EVA)

Full Information

First Posted
October 17, 2013
Last Updated
February 23, 2016
Sponsor
Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Maria Luiza Caires Comper
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01979731
Brief Title
Effects Job Rotation in the Prevention of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders
Acronym
Jobrotation
Official Title
Effects Job Rotation in the Prevention of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Cluster Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Maria Luiza Caires Comper

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective this study is evaluated if job rotation (change works that function every to work hours)contributes to reduce absence from work to complaints musculoskeletal disorders. And: Improve general health status Improve musculoskelettal symptoms Improve work performance Decrease costs with absence
Detailed Description
This study is single-blinded RCT, whose aim is to evaluate the effect of the rotation function in the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in industrial workers Methods: Participants will be recruited from employees a textile industry. The inclusion criteria are: employees age between 18 and 65 years and be able to read and understand the questionnaires. The number of working hours lost due to leave for sick leave due to illness of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (M Group International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10) is used to estimate the sample size. The average time lost during the last three months, in companies where the study was conducted is approximately 1,100 hours. Assume that interventions will enable a reduction of this number by 10%, ie, the groups will have a difference of 100 lost working hours, with a standard deviation of 250 hours. Will be considered a statistical power of 80%, α=0.05 and a follow-up loss of up to 15%. Thus, 116 workers are required per group. The productive sectors included in the study will be pre- stratified from the level of exposure to ergonomic risk factors. The sectors with similar demands will be grouped and randomly divided between the intervention group and the control group. The intervention group will perform rotation function, switching between tasks with low, moderate and high ergonomic risk and different requests for ergonomic body region added to ergonomic guidelines. The control group will receive only the ergonomic guidelines. Primary outcomes: Absence from work due to sick leave due to disease of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. Secondary outcomes are: musculoskeletal symptoms (Nordic Questionnaire and EVA), ergonomic risk factors (Quick exposure Check and Job Factors Questionnaire), psychosocial factors and fatigue (Need for Recovery Scale (NFR), general health status (WHOQOL-bref), physical activity level (Baecke Questionnaire), productivity with Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) and costs (incremental cost effectiveness ratio). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after 3 , 6 and 12 months . The information on the amount of hours lost by removal for medical leave will be recorded daily. Expected results: It is expected that interventions to reduce the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders and consequent worker absenteeism due to sick leave, 100 hours of work lost. It is expected that the results obtained in this study may contribute to setting standards in the field of Occupational Health, as well as for decision making of professionals working in this area.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Keywords
Occupational health, Ergonomics, Environments, Prevention and Control

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
116 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Job rotation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group will perform rotation function, switching between tasks with low, moderate and high ergonomic risk and different requests for ergonomic body region added to ergonomic guidelines.
Arm Title
Guidelines Ergonomics
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Manual material handling Orientation posture Orientation furniture Orientation in general
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Job rotation
Intervention Description
The intervention group will perform rotation function, switching between tasks with low, moderate and high ergonomic risk and different requests for ergonomic body region added to ergonomic guidelines.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Guidelines ergonomics
Intervention Description
Orientation about manual material handling, posture, furniture, rest break and others in general.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decrease musculoskeletal absence from work.
Description
Absence from work due to sick leave due to disease of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue
Time Frame
After 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decrease Musculoskeletal symptoms
Description
Musculoskeletal symptoms (Nordic Questionnaire1 and EVA)
Time Frame
After 6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change Geral Health Condictions
Description
Psychosocial factors and fatigue (Need for Recovery Scale (NFR), general health status (WHOQOL-bref), physical activity level (Baecke Questionnaire)
Time Frame
After 6 months
Title
Reduced Cost effectiveness
Description
Productivity (Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) and costs (incremental cost effectiveness ratio).
Time Frame
After 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Sectors workers with production lines that allow switching between different tasks and requests biomechanical exposure levels ergonomic risk. And work is carried out in production cells. Exclusion Criteria: Sector workers whose production lines are automated or semi-automated, possessing the pace of work determined by machinery and that the work stoppage is not possible.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rosimeire S Padula, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universidade Cidade de São Paulo
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rosimeire Simprini Padula
City
Atibaia
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
12942-770
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24885958
Citation
Comper ML, Padula RS. The effectiveness of job rotation to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders: protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 22;15:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-170.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28250047
Citation
Comper MLC, Dennerlein JT, Evangelista GDS, Rodrigues da Silva P, Padula RS. Effectiveness of job rotation for preventing work-related musculoskeletal diseases: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2017 Aug;74(8):545-552. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104077. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040481/
Description
Paper Protocol

Learn more about this trial

Effects Job Rotation in the Prevention of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs