search
Back to results

Evaluation of ETC-1002 in Participants With Hypercholesterolemia and Hypertension

Primary Purpose

Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ETC-1002
Placebo
Sponsored by
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hypercholesterolemia focused on measuring LDL, Cholesterol

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP greater than or equal to 130 mmHg
  • or- Mean 24-hour ambulatory DBP greater than or equal to 80 mmHg
  • Fasting LDL-C between 100 and 220 mg/dL
  • Fasting triglycerides less than 400 mg/dL
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 45 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected secondary hypertension or history of malignant hypertension
  • Taking more than two anti-hypertension medications at the first visit
  • History or current clinically significant cardiovascular disease
  • History or current type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes

Sites / Locations

  • Site 1
  • Site 2

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

ETC-1002

Placebo

Arm Description

ETC-1002 180 mg/day

Placebo control

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to Week 6
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Percent change from Baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value. For the Week 6 endpoint, missing values at Week 6 were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) procedure, with only post-Baseline values carried forward. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a Baseline assessment, and had at least 1 post-Baseline assessment, excluding any assessment taken more than 2 days after a dose of study drug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime SBP to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Daytime measurements were defined as those taken from 7 AM to 10 PM (>7 AM and ≤10 PM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime DBP to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Daytime measurements were defined as those taken from 7 AM to 10 PM (>7 AM and ≤10 PM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime SBP to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Nighttime measurements were defined as those taken from 10 PM to 7 AM (>10 PM and ≤7 AM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime DBP to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Nighttime measurements were defined as those taken from 10 PM to 7 AM (>10 PM and ≤7 AM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Sitting Cuff SBP to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Weeks -1 and 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Three BP measurements were collected at least 3 minutes apart, and the mean of the second and third measurements was calculated and used for summary and analysis. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Sitting Cuff DBP to Week 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Weeks -1 and 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Three BP measurements were collected at least 3 minutes apart, and the mean of the second and third measurements was calculated and used for summary and analysis. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) to Week 6
A non-parametric analysis was performed for hsCRP parameters. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. If hsCRP was <0.2, 0.1 was imputed for analysis. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol to Week 6
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and statin intolerance, and value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) to Week 6
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and statin intolerance, and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) to Week 6
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) to Week 6
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value. Data was analyzed using non-parametric analysis.
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C to Week 6
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and statin intolerance, and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids (FFA) to Week 6
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 6
Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Plasma Trough Concentrations of ETC-1002 and Metabolite ESP15228
Plasma trough concentration is defined as the lowest concentration reached before the next dose is administered.

Full Information

First Posted
June 16, 2014
Last Updated
March 9, 2023
Sponsor
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Collaborators
Medpace, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02178098
Brief Title
Evaluation of ETC-1002 in Participants With Hypercholesterolemia and Hypertension
Official Title
A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ETC-1002 in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia and Hypertension
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 16, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 22, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 22, 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Collaborators
Medpace, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This Phase 2 study will assess the efficacy and safety of ETC-1002 monotherapy versus placebo in participants with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension
Keywords
LDL, Cholesterol

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
143 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ETC-1002
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ETC-1002 180 mg/day
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo control
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ETC-1002
Intervention Description
ETC-1002 capsules taken once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo capsules taken once daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to Week 6
Description
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Percent change from Baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value. For the Week 6 endpoint, missing values at Week 6 were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) procedure, with only post-Baseline values carried forward. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a Baseline assessment, and had at least 1 post-Baseline assessment, excluding any assessment taken more than 2 days after a dose of study drug
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime SBP to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Daytime measurements were defined as those taken from 7 AM to 10 PM (>7 AM and ≤10 PM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime DBP to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Daytime measurements were defined as those taken from 7 AM to 10 PM (>7 AM and ≤10 PM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime SBP to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Nighttime measurements were defined as those taken from 10 PM to 7 AM (>10 PM and ≤7 AM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime DBP to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Nighttime measurements were defined as those taken from 10 PM to 7 AM (>10 PM and ≤7 AM). The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Sitting Cuff SBP to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Weeks -1 and 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Three BP measurements were collected at least 3 minutes apart, and the mean of the second and third measurements was calculated and used for summary and analysis. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline: 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Sitting Cuff DBP to Week 6
Description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Weeks -1 and 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. Three BP measurements were collected at least 3 minutes apart, and the mean of the second and third measurements was calculated and used for summary and analysis. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) to Week 6
Description
A non-parametric analysis was performed for hsCRP parameters. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. If hsCRP was <0.2, 0.1 was imputed for analysis. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol to Week 6
Description
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and statin intolerance, and value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) to Week 6
Description
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and statin intolerance, and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) to Week 6
Description
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to the first dose of study medication. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with a term for treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) to Week 6
Description
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value. Data was analyzed using non-parametric analysis.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C to Week 6
Description
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment and statin intolerance, and Baseline value as a covariate. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids (FFA) to Week 6
Description
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. The Week 6 endpoint was the last available post-Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 6
Description
Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline; 6 weeks
Title
Plasma Trough Concentrations of ETC-1002 and Metabolite ESP15228
Description
Plasma trough concentration is defined as the lowest concentration reached before the next dose is administered.
Time Frame
Week 2, Week 4 and Week 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP greater than or equal to 130 mmHg or- Mean 24-hour ambulatory DBP greater than or equal to 80 mmHg Fasting LDL-C between 100 and 220 mg/dL Fasting triglycerides less than 400 mg/dL Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 45 kg/m2 Exclusion Criteria: Known or suspected secondary hypertension or history of malignant hypertension Taking more than two anti-hypertension medications at the first visit History or current clinically significant cardiovascular disease History or current type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medpace Medical Monitor
Organizational Affiliation
Medpace, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35209
Country
United States
City
Muscle Shoals
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35662
Country
United States
City
Chandler
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85224
Country
United States
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85306
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90057
Country
United States
City
DeLand
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32720
Country
United States
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33306
Country
United States
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33012
Country
United States
City
Oviedo
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32765
Country
United States
City
Pembroke Pines
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33026
Country
United States
City
Pembroke Pines
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33029
Country
United States
City
Port Orange
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32127
Country
United States
City
Meridian
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83646
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60607
Country
United States
City
Gurnee
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60031
Country
United States
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46260
Country
United States
City
Paducah
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42003
Country
United States
City
Auburn
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04210
Country
United States
City
Olive Branch
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
38654
Country
United States
City
Butte
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59701
Country
United States
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89123
Country
United States
City
Berlin
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08009
Country
United States
City
Endwell
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13760
Country
United States
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45245
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45246
Country
United States
City
Lyndhurst
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44124
Country
United States
City
Willoughby Hills
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44094
Country
United States
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74136
Country
United States
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97404
Country
United States
City
Downingtown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19335
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Mount Pleasant
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29464
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Mount Pleasant
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29464
Country
United States
City
Simpsonville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29681
Country
United States
City
Corpus Christi
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78404
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75234
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77036
Country
United States
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84124
Country
United States
City
Kenosha
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53142
Country
United States
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53719
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23770179
Citation
Ballantyne CM, Davidson MH, Macdougall DE, Bays HE, Dicarlo LA, Rosenberg NL, Margulies J, Newton RS. Efficacy and safety of a novel dual modulator of adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 24;62(13):1154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.050. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24385236
Citation
Gutierrez MJ, Rosenberg NL, Macdougall DE, Hanselman JC, Margulies JR, Strange P, Milad MA, McBride SJ, Newton RS. Efficacy and safety of ETC-1002, a novel investigational low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol-lowering therapy for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Mar;34(3):676-83. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302677. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23118444
Citation
Pinkosky SL, Filippov S, Srivastava RA, Hanselman JC, Bradshaw CD, Hurley TR, Cramer CT, Spahr MA, Brant AF, Houghton JL, Baker C, Naples M, Adeli K, Newton RS. AMP-activated protein kinase and ATP-citrate lyase are two distinct molecular targets for ETC-1002, a novel small molecule regulator of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013 Jan;54(1):134-51. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M030528. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23709692
Citation
Filippov S, Pinkosky SL, Lister RJ, Pawloski C, Hanselman JC, Cramer CT, Srivastava RAK, Hurley TR, Bradshaw CD, Spahr MA, Newton RS. ETC-1002 regulates immune response, leukocyte homing, and adipose tissue inflammation via LKB1-dependent activation of macrophage AMPK. J Lipid Res. 2013 Aug;54(8):2095-2108. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M035212. Epub 2013 May 24.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of ETC-1002 in Participants With Hypercholesterolemia and Hypertension

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs