search
Back to results

Program for the Identification of "Actionable" Atrial Fibrillation in the Family Practice Setting (PIAAF-FP)

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
30 Second Pulse Check
Watch BP Home A
HeartCheck Hand-held ECG device
Sponsored by
Population Health Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Atrial Fibrillation focused on measuring Atrial Fibrillation, Screening, Family Practice, Novel screening technologies

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥65 years.
  2. Attending their usual Primary Care Clinic.
  3. Provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients considered by the Investigator to be unsuitable for study follow-up because the patient:

    1. is unreliable concerning the follow-up schedule
    2. cannot be contacted by telephone
    3. has a life expectancy less than the anticipated study duration due to concomitant disease.
  2. Presence of an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator.
  3. Inability to have a BP cuff applied.
  4. Documented significant allergy to ECG electrode adhesive.
  5. Previously screened as part of this study.

Sites / Locations

  • Foothills Family Medical Centre
  • Crowfoot Village Family Practice
  • Smith Clinic, Camrose PCN
  • Abbottsfield Medical Centre
  • Alta Clinical Research
  • Edmonton Oliver PCN
  • Peaks to Prairies PCN
  • Hamilton Medical Clinic
  • Queen's Family Health Team
  • Kirkfield Medical Centre
  • Ken Ng Family Practice / Total Health Management
  • SKDS Research Inc
  • Dr. Mark Robertson Family Practice
  • The Port Arthur Clinic Research Program
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • Mount Dennis Weston Health Centre
  • Village Health Centre
  • Women's College Hospital
  • Sameh Fikry Medicine Professional Corporation

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Screening

Arm Description

Subjects will undergo three screening methods for atrial fibrillation: 30 Second Pulse Check Watch BP Home A HeartCheck Hand-held ECG device

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Performance of screening tests
The sensitivity and specificity of SL-ECG and BP-AF will be separately compared with that of pulse palpation alone using McNemar's method. This method can be used when only those subjects screening positive attend for confirmatory testing (12-lead ECG ± Holter monitor). A 2-sided alpha of 0.025 will be used to allow for multiple comparisons. A further analysis will be performed using the SL-ECG data as the gold standard. To ensure adequate diagnostic quality, this analysis will only be performed if 5% or less of the overall SL-ECG tracings are deemed "uninterpretable". A bipolar ECG interpreted by a cardiologist has a reported 99% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the diagnosis of AF. If this exploratory analysis is performed it will enable estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of the pulse-check and BP-AF device.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cost of each method per case of actionable AF detected
Cost-effectiveness measures based on each screening test and their potential impact on stroke and other clinical endpoints
Prescription rates at 90±14 days for oral anticoagulant agents (OACs) and drugs for control of heart rate and/or rhythm for patients with actionable AF
Relationship between CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and prescription rates for OACs at 90±14 days.
Number needed to screen to detect one case of AF, in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics (gender, age, comorbidities).
Screener and patient experiences with the different screening methods, assessed by satisfaction questionnaire.
Resting heart rate & BP at baseline and 90±14 days for patients with newly diagnosed AF.
Time taken for each screening test
Death rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Stroke or transient ischemic attack rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Systemic embolism rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Myocardial infarction rate rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Significant bleeding rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Hospitalization due to heart failure rate for each case of actionable AFib identified

Full Information

First Posted
September 30, 2014
Last Updated
October 4, 2018
Sponsor
Population Health Research Institute
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02262351
Brief Title
Program for the Identification of "Actionable" Atrial Fibrillation in the Family Practice Setting
Acronym
PIAAF-FP
Official Title
Program for the Identification of "Actionable" Atrial Fibrillation in the Family Practice Setting
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 15, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Population Health Research Institute
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for stroke. The identification and treatment of AF is one of the best way to prevent stroke. The problem is that because AF may cause minimal symptoms, it often goes undetected before a patient suffers a stroke. Also, it is known that as many as half of all patients with known AF may not be receiving appropriate anticoagulation for their condition. New technologies are making it possible to improve AF detection. Subjects in this study will be screened for AF using three simple methods: a 30-second pulse check, a hand-held single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device and a blood pressure monitor with built-in AF screening capabilities. If more patients with AF can be detected, more patients will be able to receive guideline-recommended anticoagulant therapy, and more strokes, deaths, disability, and dementia will be prevented.
Detailed Description
Participants will be screened for AF using three simple methods (pulse check, single-lead ECG, blood pressure machine with automated AF detection algorithms). Subjects screening positive on any test will attend for a 12-lead ECG within 24 h. For all patients with AF detected, clinical characteristics and medications will be compared at baseline and 90±14 days later.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation
Keywords
Atrial Fibrillation, Screening, Family Practice, Novel screening technologies

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
2174 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Screening
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo three screening methods for atrial fibrillation: 30 Second Pulse Check Watch BP Home A HeartCheck Hand-held ECG device
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
30 Second Pulse Check
Intervention Description
To detect atrial fibrillation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Watch BP Home A
Intervention Description
Blood pressure device that detects atrial fibrillation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
HeartCheck Hand-held ECG device
Intervention Description
To detect atrial fibrillation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance of screening tests
Description
The sensitivity and specificity of SL-ECG and BP-AF will be separately compared with that of pulse palpation alone using McNemar's method. This method can be used when only those subjects screening positive attend for confirmatory testing (12-lead ECG ± Holter monitor). A 2-sided alpha of 0.025 will be used to allow for multiple comparisons. A further analysis will be performed using the SL-ECG data as the gold standard. To ensure adequate diagnostic quality, this analysis will only be performed if 5% or less of the overall SL-ECG tracings are deemed "uninterpretable". A bipolar ECG interpreted by a cardiologist has a reported 99% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the diagnosis of AF. If this exploratory analysis is performed it will enable estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of the pulse-check and BP-AF device.
Time Frame
Baseline visit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost of each method per case of actionable AF detected
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Cost-effectiveness measures based on each screening test and their potential impact on stroke and other clinical endpoints
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Prescription rates at 90±14 days for oral anticoagulant agents (OACs) and drugs for control of heart rate and/or rhythm for patients with actionable AF
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Relationship between CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and prescription rates for OACs at 90±14 days.
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Number needed to screen to detect one case of AF, in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics (gender, age, comorbidities).
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Screener and patient experiences with the different screening methods, assessed by satisfaction questionnaire.
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Resting heart rate & BP at baseline and 90±14 days for patients with newly diagnosed AF.
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Time taken for each screening test
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Death rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Stroke or transient ischemic attack rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Systemic embolism rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Myocardial infarction rate rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Significant bleeding rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Hospitalization due to heart failure rate for each case of actionable AFib identified
Time Frame
90 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥65 years. Attending their usual Primary Care Clinic. Provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Patients considered by the Investigator to be unsuitable for study follow-up because the patient: is unreliable concerning the follow-up schedule cannot be contacted by telephone has a life expectancy less than the anticipated study duration due to concomitant disease. Presence of an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator. Inability to have a BP cuff applied. Documented significant allergy to ECG electrode adhesive. Previously screened as part of this study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
F. Russell Quinn, MRCP PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Calgary
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Foothills Family Medical Centre
City
Black Diamond
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Crowfoot Village Family Practice
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Smith Clinic, Camrose PCN
City
Camrose
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Abbottsfield Medical Centre
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Alta Clinical Research
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Edmonton Oliver PCN
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Peaks to Prairies PCN
City
Olds
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Hamilton Medical Clinic
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Queen's Family Health Team
City
Kingston
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Kirkfield Medical Centre
City
Kirkfield
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Ken Ng Family Practice / Total Health Management
City
Markham
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
SKDS Research Inc
City
Newmarket
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Dr. Mark Robertson Family Practice
City
Owen Sound
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Port Arthur Clinic Research Program
City
Thunder Bay
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Mount Dennis Weston Health Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Village Health Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Women's College Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Sameh Fikry Medicine Professional Corporation
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30072410
Citation
Quinn FR, Gladstone DJ, Ivers NM, Sandhu RK, Dolovich L, Ling A, Nakamya J, Ramasundarahettige C, Frydrych PA, Henein S, Ng K, Congdon V, Birtwhistle RV, Ward R, Healey JS. Diagnostic accuracy and yield of screening tests for atrial fibrillation in the family practice setting: a multicentre cohort study. CMAJ Open. 2018 Aug 2;6(3):E308-E315. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180001. Print 2018 Jul-Sep.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30144961
Citation
Tarride JE, Quinn FR, Blackhouse G, Sandhu RK, Burke N, Gladstone DJ, Ivers NM, Dolovich L, Thornton A, Nakamya J, Ramasundarahettige C, Frydrych PA, Henein S, Ng K, Congdon V, Birtwhistle RV, Ward R, Healey JS. Is Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Canadian Family Practices Cost-Effective in Patients 65 Years and Older? Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1522-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Program for the Identification of "Actionable" Atrial Fibrillation in the Family Practice Setting

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs