search
Back to results

Effect of Heat Exposure on Cognition in Persons With Tetraplegia

Primary Purpose

Tetraplegia, Hypothermia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Warm Temperature
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Tetraplegia focused on measuring Quadriplegia, Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injury, Body Temperature Regulation, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 68 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Duration of injury 1 year
  • Level of SCI C3-T4, AIS A & B
  • Tcore at BL <98.6 F (subnormal core body temperature)
  • Euhydration
  • Gender and age-matched ( 5 years) AB controls (between 18-68 years of age)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known heart, kidney, peripheral vascular, or cerebral vascular disease
  • High blood pressure
  • History of traumatic brain injury or diagnosed cognitive impairment
  • Untreated thyroid disease
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Acute illness or infection
  • Dehydration
  • Smoking
  • Pregnancy
  • Broken, inflamed, or otherwise fragile skin

Sites / Locations

  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Warm Temperature Exposure in Tetraplegia

Warm Temperature Exposure in Able-Bodied

Arm Description

Subjects are persons with higher-level spinal cord injury, levels C3 to T4, and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) level A and B, ages 18-68 years. Procedure is exposure to warm temperature (95 degrees Fahrenheit) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room in order to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance

Subjects are able-bodied controls matched with participants with tetraplegia for age and gender. Procedure is exposure to warm temperature (95 degrees Fahrenheit) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room in order to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Core Body Temperature From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the ability to maintain a constant body temperature (e.g., core temperature of 98.6 F) in both groups of subjects. Core temperature was measured at baseline (thermoneutral) and after 120 minutes of warm temperature exposure (Warm Challenge). The change in core temperature from baseline to 120 minutes of Warm Challenge was calculated.
Change in Cognitive Performance From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
Cognitive performance was assessed using a neuropsychological battery. Cognitive performance was assessed at 2 time points, at the end of baseline and after heat exposure (warm challenge) in both groups of subjects. The Stroop Word test measures processing speed. A T-Score of 50 means "0" difference of actual - predicted score (based on subject's age & education level). T-Scores <40 are considered "low"; T-Scores >40 are considered "normal". Changes of 10 or greater are considered clinically significant. The lowest possible T-Score is 21; the highest possible T-Score is 80. The WAIS-IV Digit Span Sequencing measures auditory processing and working memory. Each test score is converted to a scaled score (M=10, SD=3) with higher scores considered better performance. The lowest possible scaled score is 1; the highest possible scaled score is 19.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Distal Skin Temperatures From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the change in distal skin temperatures in the seated position.
Change in Sweat Rate From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the change in sweat rate in the seated position.
Change in Thermal Sensitivity From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the change in thermal sensitivity in the seated position on the 9-Point Thermal sensation scale (+4=very hot, +3=hot, +2=warm, +1=slightly warm, 0=neutral, -1=slightly cool, -2=cool, -3=cold, -4=very cold). A higher score means the subject feels hotter, which, for the identical heat challenge, means less effective thermoregulation.

Full Information

First Posted
April 20, 2015
Last Updated
November 1, 2019
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02488824
Brief Title
Effect of Heat Exposure on Cognition in Persons With Tetraplegia
Official Title
Effect of Heat Exposure on Cognition in Persons With Higher Cord Lesions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 4, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 4, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The ability to maintain normal body temperature (Tcore) is impaired in persons with tetraplegia: subnormal Tcore and vulnerability to hypothermia (<95 F) have been documented in this population after exposure to even mild environmental temperatures. However, no work to date has addressed the effect of subnormal Tcore on cognitive performance in persons with tetraplegia despite studies with able-bodied (AB) individuals that have documented progressive decline in various aspects of cognitive performance associated with the magnitude of the depression in Tcore. The investigators' study will confirm and extend their initial observations in persons with higher cord lesions who have subnormal Tcore to show that cognitive performance will be improved by raising Tcore to euthermic levels. This improvement should be associated with greater function and independence, reintegration into society, and an improved quality of life. Specific Aims: During exposure to 95 F for up to 120 minutes in the seated position, the investigators' aims are: Primary Specific Aim: To determine if a modest rise in Tcore to euthermic levels has a positive effect on cognitive performance (attention, working memory, processing speed, and executive function) in persons with higher-level spinal cord injury (SCI). Primary Hypothesis: Based on the investigators' pilot data: (1) 80% of persons with SCI will demonstrate an increase of 1 F in Tcore, while none of the AB controls will demonstrate such an increase; (2) 80% of persons with SCI will have an improvement of at least one T-score in Stroop Interference scores (a validated measure of executive function), while none of the AB controls will demonstrate a change in cognitive performance. Secondary Specific Aim: To determine changes in: (1) The average of distal skin temperatures; (2) Sweat rate; and (3) Subjective rating of thermal sensitivity. Secondary Hypothesis: Persons with SCI will have less of a percent change in average distal skin temperatures and sweat rate, and will report blunted ratings of thermal sensitivity compared to that of AB controls.
Detailed Description
This study will investigate the physiological and cognitive responses to warm exposure in persons with SCI who have subnormal Tcore and in AB persons who are euthermic. The positive effect that an increase in Tcore will be expected to have on cognitive performance, specifically working memory and executive function, will be demonstrated. These two areas of cognitive performance are vital for the ability to optimally care for one's self, at which persons with higher cord lesions must excel in order to ensure health, and for the ability to attain the maximal degree of independence possible. Preparation for Study Visits: Subjects will be instructed to avoid caffeine and alcohol, maintain normal salt and water intake, and avoid strenuous exercise for 24 hours prior to the study. Subjects will be asked to eat a light, standard meal (plain bagel or 2 pieces of toast) 2 hours prior to their visit. Subjects will be asked to empty their bladders prior to their visit and again upon arrival, if needed. Subjects will wear minimal clothing during the study to maximize skin exposure to the warm temperature. Instrumentation: Subjects with SCI will be asked to remain in their wheelchairs and AB controls will be placed in a manual wheelchair where they will remain seated and relatively still for the duration of the study visit. A thin, flexible rectal sensor will be placed 4 inches beyond the anal sphincter for Tcore collection, and skin sensors will be secured at 15 sites above and below the level of lesion for collection of skin temperature (Tsk). Sweat collection capsules will be placed on the left bicep, the left forearm, the left thigh and the left calf for measurement of sweat rate by QSweat methodology (QS). Laser Doppler flowmetry will be used to measure changes in microvascular perfusion (MVP) by placing a Doppler probe on the back of both hands and both feet to confirm peripheral blood vessel dilation. An automated blood pressure cuff will be placed above the left elbow to measure brachial BP. Baseline Collection (BL): At the end of a 30-minute acclimation period at 81 F, a baseline collection of the following parameters will be performed for 15 minutes: Tcore and Tsk will be continuously monitored; BP, heart rate (HR), and thermal sensitivity (TS) will be measured in 10-minute intervals; and MVP and QS will be measured in 15-minute intervals. After 15 minutes, a battery of cognitive tests will be administered to establish baseline cognitive performance. Thermal Challenge (Heat): Following completion of the BL period, subjects will be wheeled into a pre-heated (95 F) thermal chamber for up to 120 minutes or until Tcore increases 1 F. Tcore and Tsk will be continuously monitored to ensure subjects' safety throughout the protocol, while HR, BP, and TS will be assessed at 10-minute intervals. MVP and QS will be measured every 30 minutes. The battery of cognitive tests utilized during BL collection will be administered when Tcore increases 1 F from BL values (for subjects with tetraplegia) or after 100 minutes (for controls) to determine any change in cognition after exposure to 95 F. An increase in Tcore 1 F, significant changes in BP, or subject discomfort will result in termination of the protocol.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tetraplegia, Hypothermia, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Keywords
Quadriplegia, Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injury, Body Temperature Regulation, Mild Cognitive Impairment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
41 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Warm Temperature Exposure in Tetraplegia
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects are persons with higher-level spinal cord injury, levels C3 to T4, and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) level A and B, ages 18-68 years. Procedure is exposure to warm temperature (95 degrees Fahrenheit) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room in order to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance
Arm Title
Warm Temperature Exposure in Able-Bodied
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects are able-bodied controls matched with participants with tetraplegia for age and gender. Procedure is exposure to warm temperature (95 degrees Fahrenheit) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room in order to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Warm Temperature
Other Intervention Name(s)
95 F
Intervention Description
Subjects will be exposed to a routinely encountered warm temperature (95 F) for up to to 2 hours, depending on their vital signs (BP, HR, Tcore) and tolerance (comfort).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Core Body Temperature From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
Description
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the ability to maintain a constant body temperature (e.g., core temperature of 98.6 F) in both groups of subjects. Core temperature was measured at baseline (thermoneutral) and after 120 minutes of warm temperature exposure (Warm Challenge). The change in core temperature from baseline to 120 minutes of Warm Challenge was calculated.
Time Frame
From Baseline to 120 Minutes
Title
Change in Cognitive Performance From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
Description
Cognitive performance was assessed using a neuropsychological battery. Cognitive performance was assessed at 2 time points, at the end of baseline and after heat exposure (warm challenge) in both groups of subjects. The Stroop Word test measures processing speed. A T-Score of 50 means "0" difference of actual - predicted score (based on subject's age & education level). T-Scores <40 are considered "low"; T-Scores >40 are considered "normal". Changes of 10 or greater are considered clinically significant. The lowest possible T-Score is 21; the highest possible T-Score is 80. The WAIS-IV Digit Span Sequencing measures auditory processing and working memory. Each test score is converted to a scaled score (M=10, SD=3) with higher scores considered better performance. The lowest possible scaled score is 1; the highest possible scaled score is 19.
Time Frame
From Baseline to 120 Minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Distal Skin Temperatures From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
Description
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the change in distal skin temperatures in the seated position.
Time Frame
From Baseline to 120 Minutes
Title
Change in Sweat Rate From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
Description
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the change in sweat rate in the seated position.
Time Frame
From Baseline to 120 Minutes
Title
Change in Thermal Sensitivity From Baseline to 120 Minutes Post Warm Challenge
Description
The investigators measured the effects of warm temperature (95 F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the change in thermal sensitivity in the seated position on the 9-Point Thermal sensation scale (+4=very hot, +3=hot, +2=warm, +1=slightly warm, 0=neutral, -1=slightly cool, -2=cool, -3=cold, -4=very cold). A higher score means the subject feels hotter, which, for the identical heat challenge, means less effective thermoregulation.
Time Frame
From Baseline to 120 Minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
68 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Duration of injury 1 year Level of SCI C3-T4, AIS A & B Tcore at BL <98.6 F (subnormal core body temperature) Euhydration Gender and age-matched ( 5 years) AB controls (between 18-68 years of age) Exclusion Criteria: Known heart, kidney, peripheral vascular, or cerebral vascular disease High blood pressure History of traumatic brain injury or diagnosed cognitive impairment Untreated thyroid disease Diabetes mellitus Acute illness or infection Dehydration Smoking Pregnancy Broken, inflamed, or otherwise fragile skin
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Philip Handrakis, PT DPT EdD
Organizational Affiliation
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10468
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Links:
URL
http://scirc.org/
Description
Click here for more information about this study: Effect of Heat Exposure on Cognition in Persons with Higher Cord Lesions

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Heat Exposure on Cognition in Persons With Tetraplegia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs