University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Suramin Autism Treatment-1 (SAT1) Trial (SAT1)
Primary Purpose
Autism Spectrum Disorders
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Suramin
Saline
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Autism Spectrum Disorders focused on measuring mitochondria, purinergic signaling, cell danger response
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) score of ≥ 7
- Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th edition (DSM-V)
- Stable treatment and diet regimen for ≥ 2 months
- Resident of San Diego region
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any prescription medications
- Hospitalization within the previous 2 months
- Active medical problem such as seizures, heart, liver, kidney, or adrenal disease
- Planning to start a new drug, diet, or behavioral intervention during the study
- Weight under the 5th percentile for age
- Unable to tolerate venipuncture, urine collection, or an indwelling intravenous catheter for 3-4 hours
- Plasma creatinine ≥ 1.4 mg/dl
- Liver function alanine amino transferase (ALT) or aspartate amino transferase (AST) ≥ 1.5-fold above the upper limit of normal
- Known intolerance to suramin or other antipurinergic drugs
- Unable to perform or cooperate with study requirements
Sites / Locations
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Suramin
Saline
Arm Description
20 mg/kg suramin in 50 ml of saline by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes
50 ml of saline by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition (ADOS2)
ADOS2 comparison scores are units on a scale of 0-10. A score of 7-10 was required for enrollment. A score of 7-10 is diagnostic for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The higher the score, the more severe the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. Scores of 6 and below are considered off the ASD spectrum.
Expressive Language
Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT) scores are normalized for age. Typical language development produces a mean score of 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Outcomes for EOWPVT were expressed as the mean of the child-specific difference before and 6-weeks after treatment. For example, if the 6-week standard EOWPVT score was 59.6 and the baseline score was 63.8, the difference is -4.2 (= 59.6 - 63.8). A decrease in score at 6 weeks would corresponds to a decrease in language performance, while an increase, a positive difference, would reflect an increase.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)
The full ABC is a 58-item parent rating with five factors: Irritability, Social Withdrawal, Stereotypy, Hyperactivity and Inappropriate Speech. Stereotypy is reported, and scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse behavior. A negative difference corresponds to decreased symptoms after treatment. A positive difference corresponds to increased symptoms after treatment.
Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC)
The reported value is the Language sub-score of the ATEC, and the range for the language sub-score is 0-20. The higher the score, the worse the disability. Outcomes were measured at 6 weeks after treatment compared to baseline. A negative difference corresponds to a decrease in language disability, i.e an improvement in speech and language. A positive difference reflects an increase in language disability, i.e. a decrease in speech and language.
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
The CGI-I is scale that ranges from 1-7, reflecting the change in core autism behaviors after treatment. 1 is much improved, 4 is unchanged, and 7 is much worse.
Repetitive Behavior Questionnaire
Total repetitive behavior was assessed using the Repetitive behavior questionnaire (RBQ), which has a scale from 0-87. Higher scores correspond to more severe repetitive behavior. Outcomes were analyzed as the difference in the score 6 weeks after treatment compared to baseline. A negative difference corresponds to improved behavior compared to baseline. A positive difference corresponds to worse behavior.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02508259
First Posted
July 22, 2015
Last Updated
June 21, 2019
Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02508259
Brief Title
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Suramin Autism Treatment-1 (SAT1) Trial
Acronym
SAT1
Official Title
The UCSD Suramin Autism Treatment-1 (SAT1) Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is designed to test the safety and efficacy of a single, intravenous dose of suramin in autism spectrum disorders (ASD).
Detailed Description
This study is designed to test a new theory of the origin and treatment of ASD. In this theory, ASD is caused by both genes and environment interacting to produce a persistent cell danger response (CDR; Naviaux RK, 2014) that interferes with and alters normal child brain development. Gut microbiome and immune systems are also affected. In this theory, the pathological persistence of the cell danger response is traceable to mitochondria, and maintained by purinergic signaling mediated by the release of extracellular nucleotides like adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), uridine triphosphate (UTP), and uridine diphosphate (UDP). Suramin inhibits excess purinergic signaling by acting as a competitive inhibitor of nucleotide signaling at both ionotropic purinergic (P2X) receptors, and G-protein coupled, metabotropic purinergic (P2Y) receptors. Suramin has been found to correct the symptoms, metabolism, and brain synaptic abnormalities in two classical genetic and environmental mouse models of autism (Naviaux JC, et al. 2015; Naviaux JC, et al. 2014; Naviaux RK, et al. 2013). This study will test the safety and efficacy of a single dose of suramin in children with ASD. While it is not anticipated that a single dose will produce benefits for more than a few weeks, if successful, this study may lead to the development of newer and safer drugs for autism treatment.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Autism Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
mitochondria, purinergic signaling, cell danger response
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Suramin
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
20 mg/kg suramin in 50 ml of saline by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes
Arm Title
Saline
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
50 ml of saline by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Suramin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Germanin
Intervention Description
20 mg/kg IV in 50 ml saline over 30 minutes
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Saline
Other Intervention Name(s)
Normal saline
Intervention Description
50 ml IV over 30 minutes
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition (ADOS2)
Description
ADOS2 comparison scores are units on a scale of 0-10. A score of 7-10 was required for enrollment. A score of 7-10 is diagnostic for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The higher the score, the more severe the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. Scores of 6 and below are considered off the ASD spectrum.
Time Frame
6 weeks compared to baseline
Title
Expressive Language
Description
Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT) scores are normalized for age. Typical language development produces a mean score of 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Outcomes for EOWPVT were expressed as the mean of the child-specific difference before and 6-weeks after treatment. For example, if the 6-week standard EOWPVT score was 59.6 and the baseline score was 63.8, the difference is -4.2 (= 59.6 - 63.8). A decrease in score at 6 weeks would corresponds to a decrease in language performance, while an increase, a positive difference, would reflect an increase.
Time Frame
6 weeks compared to baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)
Description
The full ABC is a 58-item parent rating with five factors: Irritability, Social Withdrawal, Stereotypy, Hyperactivity and Inappropriate Speech. Stereotypy is reported, and scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse behavior. A negative difference corresponds to decreased symptoms after treatment. A positive difference corresponds to increased symptoms after treatment.
Time Frame
6 weeks compared to baseline
Title
Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC)
Description
The reported value is the Language sub-score of the ATEC, and the range for the language sub-score is 0-20. The higher the score, the worse the disability. Outcomes were measured at 6 weeks after treatment compared to baseline. A negative difference corresponds to a decrease in language disability, i.e an improvement in speech and language. A positive difference reflects an increase in language disability, i.e. a decrease in speech and language.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
Description
The CGI-I is scale that ranges from 1-7, reflecting the change in core autism behaviors after treatment. 1 is much improved, 4 is unchanged, and 7 is much worse.
Time Frame
Overall ASD symptoms at 6 weeks
Title
Repetitive Behavior Questionnaire
Description
Total repetitive behavior was assessed using the Repetitive behavior questionnaire (RBQ), which has a scale from 0-87. Higher scores correspond to more severe repetitive behavior. Outcomes were analyzed as the difference in the score 6 weeks after treatment compared to baseline. A negative difference corresponds to improved behavior compared to baseline. A positive difference corresponds to worse behavior.
Time Frame
6 weeks compared to baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
4 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) score of ≥ 7
Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th edition (DSM-V)
Stable treatment and diet regimen for ≥ 2 months
Resident of San Diego region
Exclusion Criteria:
Any prescription medications
Hospitalization within the previous 2 months
Active medical problem such as seizures, heart, liver, kidney, or adrenal disease
Planning to start a new drug, diet, or behavioral intervention during the study
Weight under the 5th percentile for age
Unable to tolerate venipuncture, urine collection, or an indwelling intravenous catheter for 3-4 hours
Plasma creatinine ≥ 1.4 mg/dl
Liver function alanine amino transferase (ALT) or aspartate amino transferase (AST) ≥ 1.5-fold above the upper limit of normal
Known intolerance to suramin or other antipurinergic drugs
Unable to perform or cooperate with study requirements
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert K Naviaux, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Diego
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92093
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Safety, metabolomic, and completed outcome data will be made available to qualified institutional groups after peer review and publication.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25705365
Citation
Naviaux JC, Wang L, Li K, Bright AT, Alaynick WA, Williams KR, Powell SB, Naviaux RK. Antipurinergic therapy corrects the autism-like features in the Fragile X (Fmr1 knockout) mouse model. Mol Autism. 2015 Jan 13;6:1. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-6-1. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24937094
Citation
Naviaux JC, Schuchbauer MA, Li K, Wang L, Risbrough VB, Powell SB, Naviaux RK. Reversal of autism-like behaviors and metabolism in adult mice with single-dose antipurinergic therapy. Transl Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 17;4(6):e400. doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.33.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23516405
Citation
Naviaux RK, Zolkipli Z, Wang L, Nakayama T, Naviaux JC, Le TP, Schuchbauer MA, Rogac M, Tang Q, Dugan LL, Powell SB. Antipurinergic therapy corrects the autism-like features in the poly(IC) mouse model. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057380. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23981537
Citation
Naviaux RK. Metabolic features of the cell danger response. Mitochondrion. 2014 May;16:7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28695149
Citation
Naviaux RK, Curtis B, Li K, Naviaux JC, Bright AT, Reiner GE, Westerfield M, Goh S, Alaynick WA, Wang L, Capparelli EV, Adams C, Sun J, Jain S, He F, Arellano DA, Mash LE, Chukoskie L, Lincoln A, Townsend J. Low-dose suramin in autism spectrum disorder: a small, phase I/II, randomized clinical trial. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017 May 26;4(7):491-505. doi: 10.1002/acn3.424. eCollection 2017 Jul.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://naviauxlab.ucsd.edu/science-item/autism-research/
Description
Resource materials from the PI's lab website
Learn more about this trial
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Suramin Autism Treatment-1 (SAT1) Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs