search
Back to results

iPhone App Compared to Standard RR-measurement (iPARR)

Primary Purpose

Hypertension, Blood Pressure

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
cuff device (Omron HBP-1300-E Pro)
iPhone 4s
Sponsored by
Jens Eckstein
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Hypertension

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • able to give informed consent
  • in Sinus rhythm
  • no anatomical limitation to take blood pressure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Dialysis shunt

Sites / Locations

  • Universityhospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Blood pressure-measurement

Arm Description

Seven repetitive blood pressure measurements will be performed the left or right arm of all participants with an iPhone 4s and a conventional oscillometric device 'cuff device (Omron HBP-1300-E Pro)'

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Absolute difference between systolic blood pressure values determined with an oscillometric cuff device and an iPhone 4s (Delta mmHg)
In each participant seven repetitive blood pressure measurements will be performed. Starting with a conventional cuff measurement followed by an iPhone measurement, followed by a conventional cuff measurement and so on. Then the absolute difference between each pair of successive measurements will be calculated. These differences will then be averaged and documented as primary result.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Relative difference between oscillometric blood pressure measurement and iPhone based blood pressure measurement
Same as primary outcome, but calculation of delta (mmHg) and documentation as relative value (%) of the absolute systolic value.
Percent of invalid measurements
Percent of measurements that cannot be used for analysis
Comparison of primary outcome in the subgroup of patients with atherosclerosis compared to the participants without arteriosclerosis.
Quantitative differences between the accuracy of the iPhone measurements in the patients with known arteriosclerosis and the patients without arteriosclerosis

Full Information

First Posted
September 14, 2015
Last Updated
February 13, 2017
Sponsor
Jens Eckstein
Collaborators
Preventicus GmbH
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02552030
Brief Title
iPhone App Compared to Standard RR-measurement
Acronym
iPARR
Official Title
iPhone App Compared to Standard RR-measurement - iPARR Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 25, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jens Eckstein
Collaborators
Preventicus GmbH

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In this Trial we compare a new application (App) running on an iPhone (Apple inc., Model 4S) to determine systolic blood pressure (RR) and compare it to conventional oscillometric measurements using an Omron HBP-1300-E Pro device. We will include 1000 participants and perform seven repetitive blood pressure measurements (3 iPhone, 4 Omron) in each person. Primary parameter will be the absolute difference (Delta) between the correlating blood pressure measurements in mmHg.
Detailed Description
Participants will be asked for consent at the University Hospital Basel at random based on availability. Recruitment is not limited to patients. After consenting patients will accompanied to a RR-measurement unit, positioned in a chair and kept at rest for 4 minutes. Then 7 blood pressure measurements at the same arm will be performed (Cuff/iPhone/Cuff/iPhone/Cuff/iPhone/Cuff). The Cuff measurement results will be documented in the source documents (mmHg) and transferred to a trial database. The iPhone data will be transferred with patient ID to "Preventicus" for calculation of the systolic blood pressure values (mmHg) based on the pulse waves recorded by transillumination of the index fingers of the participants. "Preventicus" will have NO access to the Cuff-measurement data. Then this data will be retransferred to the trial site and merged with help of the patient ID. Absolute and relative differences of the measured (Omron) and calculated (iPhone) systolic blood pressure values (mmHg) for will be calculated and published. A subgroup of 40 participants will be evaluated in a highly standardized fashion according the ESH (European Society Hypertension) guidelines for validation studies. These data will then be published separately for validation purposes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypertension, Blood Pressure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
1019 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Blood pressure-measurement
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Seven repetitive blood pressure measurements will be performed the left or right arm of all participants with an iPhone 4s and a conventional oscillometric device 'cuff device (Omron HBP-1300-E Pro)'
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
cuff device (Omron HBP-1300-E Pro)
Intervention Description
Comparison of systolic blood pressure results measured with an oscillometric cuff device (Omron HBP-1300-E Pro) and iPhone 4s
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
iPhone 4s
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Absolute difference between systolic blood pressure values determined with an oscillometric cuff device and an iPhone 4s (Delta mmHg)
Description
In each participant seven repetitive blood pressure measurements will be performed. Starting with a conventional cuff measurement followed by an iPhone measurement, followed by a conventional cuff measurement and so on. Then the absolute difference between each pair of successive measurements will be calculated. These differences will then be averaged and documented as primary result.
Time Frame
1 day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Relative difference between oscillometric blood pressure measurement and iPhone based blood pressure measurement
Description
Same as primary outcome, but calculation of delta (mmHg) and documentation as relative value (%) of the absolute systolic value.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Percent of invalid measurements
Description
Percent of measurements that cannot be used for analysis
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Comparison of primary outcome in the subgroup of patients with atherosclerosis compared to the participants without arteriosclerosis.
Description
Quantitative differences between the accuracy of the iPhone measurements in the patients with known arteriosclerosis and the patients without arteriosclerosis
Time Frame
1 day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: able to give informed consent in Sinus rhythm no anatomical limitation to take blood pressure Exclusion Criteria: Atrial fibrillation Dialysis shunt
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jens Eckstein, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Universityhospital
City
Basel
State/Province
BS
ZIP/Postal Code
4031
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33321118
Citation
Dorr M, Weber S, Birkemeyer R, Leonardi L, Winterhalder C, Raichle CJ, Brasier N, Burkard T, Eckstein J. iPhone App compared with standard blood pressure measurement -The iPARR trial. Am Heart J. 2021 Mar;233:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33319471
Citation
Vischer AS, Socrates T, Winterhalder C, Eckstein J, Mayr M, Burkard T. How should we measure blood pressure? Implications of the fourth blood pressure measurement in office blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Jan;23(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/jch.14130. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30371728
Citation
Vischer AS, Mayr M, Socrates T, Winterhalder C, Leonardi L, Eckstein J, Burkard T. Impact of Single-Occasion American vs. Canadian Office Blood Pressure Measurement Recommendations on Blood Pressure Classification. Am J Hypertens. 2019 Jan 15;32(2):143-145. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy159.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29632098
Citation
Raichle CJ, Eckstein J, Lapaire O, Leonardi L, Brasier N, Vischer AS, Burkard T. Performance of a Blood Pressure Smartphone App in Pregnant Women: The iPARR Trial (iPhone App Compared With Standard RR Measurement). Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1164-1169. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10647. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29530989
Citation
Burkard T, Mayr M, Winterhalder C, Leonardi L, Eckstein J, Vischer AS. Reliability of single office blood pressure measurements. Heart. 2018 Jul;104(14):1173-1179. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312523. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.preventicus.com
Description
Developer of the tested App and responsible for blinded analysis of the iPhone data

Learn more about this trial

iPhone App Compared to Standard RR-measurement

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs