search
Back to results

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PF-06649751 in Parkinson's Disease Patients With Motor Fluctuations

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
PF-06649751 low dose (1 mg QD)
PF-06649751 middle dose 1 (3 mg QD)
PF-06649751 middle dose 2 (7 mg QD)
PF-06649751 high dose (15 mg QD)
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson Disease, Motor Fluctuation

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females of non-childbearing potential and/or male subjects between the ages of 40 and 85 years, inclusive.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.
  • Able to refrain from any Parkinson's disease medication not permitted by the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female of childbearing potential
  • History or presence of atypical Parkinsonian syndrome.
  • History of surgical intervention for Parkinson's disease.
  • Severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality.
  • Any condition possibly affecting drug absorption.
  • Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s), or treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days.

Sites / Locations

  • Xenoscience, Inc
  • St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
  • Arcadia Neurology Center
  • Faculty Physicians and Surgeons of Loma Linda University School of Medicine
  • Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
  • Hoag Memorial Hospital
  • SC3 Research Group, Inc
  • Neurosearch-Torrance
  • Associated Neurologists of Southern Connecticut, PC
  • Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton
  • University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
  • Neurology Associates of Ormond Beach
  • University of South Florida
  • Vero Beach Neurology and Research Institute
  • Atlanta Center for Medical Research
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Indiana University Health Neuroscience Center
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • CRI Worldwide, LLC
  • Dent Neurologic Institute
  • Dent Neurosciences Research Center ,Inc. DBA Dent Neurologic Institute
  • Dent Neurologic Institute
  • Duke University Medical center
  • Duke University/Duke Neurology/Department of Neurology
  • Wake Research Associates, LLC
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • University of Toledo
  • The Movement Disorder Clinic of Oklahoma
  • Abington Neurological Associates, Ltd.
  • Rhode Island Hospital/ Brown University Medical School
  • AS Clinical Research Consultants of North Texas, PLLC
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Booth Gardner Parkinson's Care Center
  • Montreal Neurological Hospital Research Pharmacy
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
  • CHU de Grenoble Alpes
  • CHU de Grenoble Alpes
  • CHRU de Lille-Hopital Roger Salengro
  • Hopital de la Timone APHM
  • Hopital de La Timone
  • Hopital La Pitie-Salpetriere
  • Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
  • St. Josef-Hospital GmbH
  • Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Klinik und Poliklinik fur Neurologie
  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen
  • Universitaetsklinik Ulm
  • Asahikawa Medical center
  • Medical Corporation Abe Neurology Clinic
  • Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital
  • Osaka University Hospital
  • Juntendo University Hospital
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
  • Policlinica de Guipuzcoa
  • Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
  • Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
  • Hospital Universitario y Politecnico la Fe

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

PF-06649751 low dose (1 mg QD)

PF-06649751 middle dose 1 (3 mg QD)

PF-06649751 middle dose 2 (7 mg QD)

PF-06649751 high dose (15 mg QD)

Arm Description

Placebo

PF-06649751 low dose level (1 mg QD)

PF-06649751 lower middle dose 1 (3 mg QD)

PF-06649751 higher middle dose 2 (7 mg QD)

PF-06649751 high dose (15 mg QD)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Daily OFF Time at Week 10
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half-hour intervals. Participants completed the diary by answering whether they had been OFF for 3 consecutive days in the week prior to each visit (except Day 28 visit), including 3 consecutive days during the week prior to Day 0 (Randomization). The daily OFF time was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily OFF hours from the Hauser diary at each visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Daily OFF Time
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half hour intervals. Participants completed the diary by answering whether they had been OFF for 3 consecutive days in the week prior to each visit (except Day 28 visit), including 3 consecutive days during the week prior to Day 0 (Randomization). The daily OFF time was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily OFF hours from the Hauser diary at each visit. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Change From Baseline in Daily ON Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half hour intervals. The participants answered the Hauser diary on whether they had been ON with troublesome dyskinesia. A diary day started with the interval 24:00-0:30 through 23:30-24:00 on each chronological day for 3 consecutive days. On the days recording the home diary, participants made an entry every 30 minutes during their normal waking time and upon awakening from time asleep. The daily ON hours was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily ON hours from the Hauser diary at each visit. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Change From Baseline in Daily ON Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half hour intervals. The participants answered the Hauser diary on whether they had been ON without troublesome dyskinesia. A diary day started with the interval 24:00-0:30 through 23:30-24:00 on each chronological day for 3 consecutive days. On the days recording the home diary, participants made an entry every 30 minutes during their normal waking time and upon awakening from time asleep. The daily ON hours was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily ON hours from the Hauser diary at each visit. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III
MDS-UPDRS Part III assessed the motor signs of Parkinson's disease and was administered by the investigator. It was comprised of 33 sub-scores based on 18 items, several with right, left or other body distribution scores. Each question was anchored with 5 responses that were linked to commonly accepted clinical terms: 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. If more than 7 of the Part III items were missing, the score for that time point was missing, otherwise MDS-UPDRS Part III score was imputed as sum of the non-missing items*(total number of items)/ (number of items non-missing). The MDS-UPDRS Part III total score range is 0-132. Higher score indicated more severe motor signs of Parkinson's disease. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts I, II, IV, and Total Score
Each question of Part I,II or IV with 5 responses was linked to the same clinical terms as Part III.The score was missing if more than 7 items were missing for a time point; otherwise Part I,II or IV score was imputed as sum of non-missing items*(total number of items)/(number of items non-missing).•PartI (Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living) assessed non-motor experiences of daily living using 13questions(Range:0-52).•PartII(Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living) assessed motor experiences of daily living using 13questions(Range:0-52).•PartIV(Motor Complications) assessed motor complications,dyskinesias, and motor fluctuations using historical and objective information with 6questions(Range:0-24).•MDS-UPDRS Total Score:the sum of Parts I,II,III,and IV(Range:0-260).Higher score indicated more severe motor signs of Parkinson's disease.Week15's results were interpreted cautiously given almost half participants were not available for the analysis as compared to Week10
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality
The safety laboratory tests including Hematology, Clinical Chemistry and Urinalysis were performed. Determination if there were any laboratory data abnormalities of potential clinical concern was based on Pfizer Data Standards. Incidence of laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) was summarized within each treatment group.
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results Meeting the Criteria for Categorical Summarization
Vital Signs including blood pressure and pulse rate were measured. Vital signs were collected first while the participant was in the supine position and then in the standing position.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results Meeting the Criteria for Categorical Summarization
The average of the triplicate readings of ECG data was collected at each assessment time. Number of participants with ECG results meeting the criteria for categorical summarization for time from the beginning of the P wave until the beginning of the QRS complex (PR Interval), time from ECG Q wave to the end of the S wave corresponding to ventricle depolarization (QRS Duration), time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle (QT Interval) and corrected QT (Fridericia correction) (QTcF Interval) were presented.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Post-baseline Visits
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was an interview based rating scale to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. C-SSRS responses were mapped to the C-CASA. There were 3 key endpoints for suicidality data analysis and evaluation: Suicidal Behavior: A participant was said to have suicidal behavior if the participant had experienced completed suicide / suicide attempt / reparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior. Suicidal Ideation: Any observed suicidal ideation mapped to a single C-CASA category. Suicidal Behavior or Ideation (participants with new onset suicidality): A participant was considered to have a new onset of suicidality if the participant reported no ideation and no behavior at the baseline assessment and reported any behavior or ideation post-baseline. Data observed at screening was not considered in the definition of worsening.
Change From Baseline in Total Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease - Rating Scale (QUIP-RS)
The QUIP-RS was a brief, patient reported outcome measure designed to assess the severity of symptoms of Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders (ICDs) and related behaviors reported to occur in Parkinson's disease. The QUIP-RS assessed 7 disorders (Gambling, Sex, Buying, Eating, Hobbyism-punding [performing tasks and repeating activities] and Taking medications). If more than 5 items were missing, the total QUIP-RS score was set as missing; otherwise, the total QUIP-RS score was imputed as follows: sum of the non-missing item scores * (total number of items) / (number of items non-missing). The higher score indicated a greater level of the ICD. The total QUIP-RS score for all ICDs and related disorders combined ranges from 0 to 112.
Total Physician Withdrawal Checklist (PWC-20) on Days 105 and 119, and Change From Day 105 to Day 119
The PWC-20 is a physician completed, 20 item reliable and sensitive instrument for the assessment of discontinuation symptoms. The PWC-20 was collected after the completion of study treatment and also at the first visit of follow-up. The total PWC-20 score was the sum of 20 item scores and ranged from 0 to 60. If more than 5 items were missing, the total PWC-20 score was missing; otherwise, the total PWC-20 score was imputed as follows: sum of the non-missing items * (total number of items) / (number of items non-missing). The higher score indicated more frequent/severe symptoms.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuation Due to AEs and Deaths
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not need necessarily to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: Resulted in death; Was life threatening (immediate risk of death); Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); Resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Full Information

First Posted
January 29, 2016
Last Updated
October 28, 2020
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02687542
Brief Title
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PF-06649751 in Parkinson's Disease Patients With Motor Fluctuations
Official Title
A 15-WEEK, PHASE 2, DOUBLE BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOSE RANGING STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE EFFICACY, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF PF-06649751 IN SUBJECTS WITH MOTOR FLUCTUATIONS DUE TO PARKINSON'S DISEASE
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Terminated 25Sep17 due to insufficient efficacy. Not due to safety reasons.
Study Start Date
March 3, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 10, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 10, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of PF-06649751 in Parkinson's disease patients who experience motor-fluctuations.
Detailed Description
The study has a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group design. Approximately 198 subjects will be randomized to 5 treatment groups. Each subject will participate in the study for approximately 23 weeks including a 30 day screening period, 15 week double blind treatment period, and an approximately 28 day follow-up period.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Parkinson Disease, Motor Fluctuation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
108 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo
Arm Title
PF-06649751 low dose (1 mg QD)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PF-06649751 low dose level (1 mg QD)
Arm Title
PF-06649751 middle dose 1 (3 mg QD)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PF-06649751 lower middle dose 1 (3 mg QD)
Arm Title
PF-06649751 middle dose 2 (7 mg QD)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PF-06649751 higher middle dose 2 (7 mg QD)
Arm Title
PF-06649751 high dose (15 mg QD)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PF-06649751 high dose (15 mg QD)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-06649751 low dose (1 mg QD)
Intervention Description
PF-06649751 low dose (1 mg QD)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-06649751 middle dose 1 (3 mg QD)
Intervention Description
PF-06649751 lower middle dose 1 (3 mg QD)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-06649751 middle dose 2 (7 mg QD)
Intervention Description
PF-06649751higher middle dose 2 (7 mg QD)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-06649751 high dose (15 mg QD)
Intervention Description
PF-06649751 high dose (15 mg QD)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Daily OFF Time at Week 10
Description
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half-hour intervals. Participants completed the diary by answering whether they had been OFF for 3 consecutive days in the week prior to each visit (except Day 28 visit), including 3 consecutive days during the week prior to Day 0 (Randomization). The daily OFF time was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily OFF hours from the Hauser diary at each visit.
Time Frame
Week 10; Baseline was defined as the average daily OFF time (using 3 Hauser patient diary days) prior to Day -1 (study derived day and equalled to nominal visit day 0).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Daily OFF Time
Description
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half hour intervals. Participants completed the diary by answering whether they had been OFF for 3 consecutive days in the week prior to each visit (except Day 28 visit), including 3 consecutive days during the week prior to Day 0 (Randomization). The daily OFF time was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily OFF hours from the Hauser diary at each visit. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Time Frame
Weeks 3, 5, 10 and 15; Baseline was defined as the average daily OFF time (using 3 Hauser patient diary days) prior to Day -1 (study derived day and equalled to nominal visit day 0).
Title
Change From Baseline in Daily ON Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia
Description
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half hour intervals. The participants answered the Hauser diary on whether they had been ON with troublesome dyskinesia. A diary day started with the interval 24:00-0:30 through 23:30-24:00 on each chronological day for 3 consecutive days. On the days recording the home diary, participants made an entry every 30 minutes during their normal waking time and upon awakening from time asleep. The daily ON hours was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily ON hours from the Hauser diary at each visit. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Time Frame
Weeks 3, 5, 10 and 15; Baseline was defined as the average daily ON time with Troublesome Dyskinesia (using 3 Hauser patient diary Days) prior to Day -1 (study derived day and equalled to nominal visit Day 0).
Title
Change From Baseline in Daily ON Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia
Description
A paper Hauser diary was utilized to record motor state for half hour intervals. The participants answered the Hauser diary on whether they had been ON without troublesome dyskinesia. A diary day started with the interval 24:00-0:30 through 23:30-24:00 on each chronological day for 3 consecutive days. On the days recording the home diary, participants made an entry every 30 minutes during their normal waking time and upon awakening from time asleep. The daily ON hours was calculated as the average of the 3 consecutive daily ON hours from the Hauser diary at each visit. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Time Frame
Weeks 3, 5, 10 and 15; Baseline was defined as the average daily ON time without Troublesome Dyskinesia (using 3 Hauser patient diary days) prior to Day -1 (study derived day and equalled to nominal visit Day 0)
Title
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III
Description
MDS-UPDRS Part III assessed the motor signs of Parkinson's disease and was administered by the investigator. It was comprised of 33 sub-scores based on 18 items, several with right, left or other body distribution scores. Each question was anchored with 5 responses that were linked to commonly accepted clinical terms: 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. If more than 7 of the Part III items were missing, the score for that time point was missing, otherwise MDS-UPDRS Part III score was imputed as sum of the non-missing items*(total number of items)/ (number of items non-missing). The MDS-UPDRS Part III total score range is 0-132. Higher score indicated more severe motor signs of Parkinson's disease. Results at Week 15 should be interpreted with caution given almost half the participants were not available for this analysis at Week 15 as compared to Week 10 and the complicated nature of protocol changes that impacted the study design after Week 10.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 and 15; Baseline was defined as the Day -1 (study derived day and equalled to nominal visit Day 0) measurement
Title
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts I, II, IV, and Total Score
Description
Each question of Part I,II or IV with 5 responses was linked to the same clinical terms as Part III.The score was missing if more than 7 items were missing for a time point; otherwise Part I,II or IV score was imputed as sum of non-missing items*(total number of items)/(number of items non-missing).•PartI (Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living) assessed non-motor experiences of daily living using 13questions(Range:0-52).•PartII(Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living) assessed motor experiences of daily living using 13questions(Range:0-52).•PartIV(Motor Complications) assessed motor complications,dyskinesias, and motor fluctuations using historical and objective information with 6questions(Range:0-24).•MDS-UPDRS Total Score:the sum of Parts I,II,III,and IV(Range:0-260).Higher score indicated more severe motor signs of Parkinson's disease.Week15's results were interpreted cautiously given almost half participants were not available for the analysis as compared to Week10
Time Frame
Weeks 5, 10 and 15; Baseline was defined as the Day -1 (study derived day and equalled to nominal visit Day 0) measurement
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality
Description
The safety laboratory tests including Hematology, Clinical Chemistry and Urinalysis were performed. Determination if there were any laboratory data abnormalities of potential clinical concern was based on Pfizer Data Standards. Incidence of laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) was summarized within each treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 17
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results Meeting the Criteria for Categorical Summarization
Description
Vital Signs including blood pressure and pulse rate were measured. Vital signs were collected first while the participant was in the supine position and then in the standing position.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 17
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results Meeting the Criteria for Categorical Summarization
Description
The average of the triplicate readings of ECG data was collected at each assessment time. Number of participants with ECG results meeting the criteria for categorical summarization for time from the beginning of the P wave until the beginning of the QRS complex (PR Interval), time from ECG Q wave to the end of the S wave corresponding to ventricle depolarization (QRS Duration), time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle (QT Interval) and corrected QT (Fridericia correction) (QTcF Interval) were presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 17
Title
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Assessed Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Post-baseline Visits
Description
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was an interview based rating scale to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. C-SSRS responses were mapped to the C-CASA. There were 3 key endpoints for suicidality data analysis and evaluation: Suicidal Behavior: A participant was said to have suicidal behavior if the participant had experienced completed suicide / suicide attempt / reparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior. Suicidal Ideation: Any observed suicidal ideation mapped to a single C-CASA category. Suicidal Behavior or Ideation (participants with new onset suicidality): A participant was considered to have a new onset of suicidality if the participant reported no ideation and no behavior at the baseline assessment and reported any behavior or ideation post-baseline. Data observed at screening was not considered in the definition of worsening.
Time Frame
Days 0 (Baseline), 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 70, 77, 84, 91, 105 and 119
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease - Rating Scale (QUIP-RS)
Description
The QUIP-RS was a brief, patient reported outcome measure designed to assess the severity of symptoms of Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders (ICDs) and related behaviors reported to occur in Parkinson's disease. The QUIP-RS assessed 7 disorders (Gambling, Sex, Buying, Eating, Hobbyism-punding [performing tasks and repeating activities] and Taking medications). If more than 5 items were missing, the total QUIP-RS score was set as missing; otherwise, the total QUIP-RS score was imputed as follows: sum of the non-missing item scores * (total number of items) / (number of items non-missing). The higher score indicated a greater level of the ICD. The total QUIP-RS score for all ICDs and related disorders combined ranges from 0 to 112.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 5, 10 and 15
Title
Total Physician Withdrawal Checklist (PWC-20) on Days 105 and 119, and Change From Day 105 to Day 119
Description
The PWC-20 is a physician completed, 20 item reliable and sensitive instrument for the assessment of discontinuation symptoms. The PWC-20 was collected after the completion of study treatment and also at the first visit of follow-up. The total PWC-20 score was the sum of 20 item scores and ranged from 0 to 60. If more than 5 items were missing, the total PWC-20 score was missing; otherwise, the total PWC-20 score was imputed as follows: sum of the non-missing items * (total number of items) / (number of items non-missing). The higher score indicated more frequent/severe symptoms.
Time Frame
Days 105 and 119
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuation Due to AEs and Deaths
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not need necessarily to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: Resulted in death; Was life threatening (immediate risk of death); Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); Resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time Frame
Day 1 to follow-up (Week 19 visit)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Females of non-childbearing potential and/or male subjects between the ages of 40 and 85 years, inclusive. Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Able to refrain from any Parkinson's disease medication not permitted by the protocol. Exclusion Criteria: Female of childbearing potential History or presence of atypical Parkinsonian syndrome. History of surgical intervention for Parkinson's disease. Severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality. Any condition possibly affecting drug absorption. Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s), or treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Xenoscience, Inc
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85004
Country
United States
Facility Name
St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85013
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arcadia Neurology Center
City
Arcadia
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Faculty Physicians and Surgeons of Loma Linda University School of Medicine
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
City
Newport Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92658
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hoag Memorial Hospital
City
Newport Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92663
Country
United States
Facility Name
SC3 Research Group, Inc
City
Pasadena
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Neurosearch-Torrance
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90505
Country
United States
Facility Name
Associated Neurologists of Southern Connecticut, PC
City
Fairfield
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06824
Country
United States
Facility Name
Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Neurology Associates of Ormond Beach
City
Ormond Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32174
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of South Florida
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vero Beach Neurology and Research Institute
City
Vero Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32960
Country
United States
Facility Name
Atlanta Center for Medical Research
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30331
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University Health Neuroscience Center
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
CRI Worldwide, LLC
City
Marlton
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08053
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dent Neurologic Institute
City
Amherst
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14226
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dent Neurosciences Research Center ,Inc. DBA Dent Neurologic Institute
City
Amherst
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14226
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dent Neurologic Institute
City
Orchard Park
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14127
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University/Duke Neurology/Department of Neurology
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Research Associates, LLC
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Toledo
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43614
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Movement Disorder Clinic of Oklahoma
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Abington Neurological Associates, Ltd.
City
Willow Grove
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rhode Island Hospital/ Brown University Medical School
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02903
Country
United States
Facility Name
AS Clinical Research Consultants of North Texas, PLLC
City
Greenville
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Booth Gardner Parkinson's Care Center
City
Kirkland
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montreal Neurological Hospital Research Pharmacy
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3A 2B4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3A 2B4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHU de Grenoble Alpes
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38043 Cedex 9
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Grenoble Alpes
City
La Tronche
ZIP/Postal Code
38700
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU de Lille-Hopital Roger Salengro
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037 cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital de la Timone APHM
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13385 cedex 05
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital de La Timone
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13385 cedex 05
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital La Pitie-Salpetriere
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
City
Freiburg
State/Province
Baden-wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
Germany
Facility Name
St. Josef-Hospital GmbH
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44791
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Klinik und Poliklinik fur Neurologie
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen
City
Muenchen
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinik Ulm
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Asahikawa Medical center
City
Asahikawa
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
0708644
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Medical Corporation Abe Neurology Clinic
City
Morioka
State/Province
Iwate
ZIP/Postal Code
020-0878
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital
City
Kita-ku
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
530-8480
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Osaka University Hospital
City
Suita
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
565-0871
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Juntendo University Hospital
City
Bunkyo-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
113-8431
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico Universitario
City
Santiago de Compostela
State/Province
A Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
City
Hospitalet de Llobregat
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Policlinica de Guipuzcoa
City
San Sebastian
State/Province
Guipuzcoa
ZIP/Postal Code
20009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico la Fe
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Links:
URL
https://pmiform.com/clinical-trial-info-request?StudyID=B7601003
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PF-06649751 in Parkinson's Disease Patients With Motor Fluctuations

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs