search
Back to results

Comparison of Different Meshes in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair

Primary Purpose

Hernia, Inguinal

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Hong Kong
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Progrip
Non-Progrip
Sponsored by
The University of Hong Kong
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hernia, Inguinal focused on measuring self-gripping mesh, fibrin glue, total extraperitoneal

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age≥18
  • Unilateral inguinal hernia with large hernia defect size (>3cm)
  • Bilateral inguinal hernias
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: 1-2
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior surgery for ipsilateral inguinal hernia (i.e. recurrent inguinal hernia)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: 3 or above
  • History of major abdominal surgery that may result in difficulty in development of preperitoneal space
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding
  • Any serious concomitant illness with short life expectancy
  • Subject who is not able to attend follow up postoperatively

Sites / Locations

  • Tung Wah Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Progrip

Non-Progrip

Arm Description

The Progrip group is the intervention group. Patients will undergo laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. The surgeon will use a self-gripping mesh to repair the hernia. No fixation is required for the mesh.

The Non-Progrip group is the control group. Operation is performed under general anesthesia. A standard three-trocar technique is used: one infra-umbilical camera trocar (1cm) and two 5mm trocars placed at midline between the umbilicus and pubic bone (or one at the side of inguinal hernia). A laparoscope is inserted to the preperitoneal space through the incision. The space is insufflated with carbon dioxide. Dissection is performed, hernia content (if any) is reduced. A non self-gripping synthetic mesh is placed. Fibrin glue is used for fixation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Chronic pain
Chronic pain after hernia surgery was defined as the presence of pain at rest at the groin area. The severity of pain will be measured by a linear analogue pain score sacle from 0 to 10. Score >= 1 indicate the presence of pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures

mesh deployment time
the time for mesh deployment during surgery
intraoperative complications
intraoperative complications
hernia recurrence rate
hernia recurrence rate
quality of life
quality of life scores

Full Information

First Posted
March 10, 2016
Last Updated
November 22, 2018
Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02712827
Brief Title
Comparison of Different Meshes in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Short Term Outcomes of Self-gripping (Progrip) Mesh With Fibrin Glue Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Inguinal Hernia Repair
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The placement of mesh is important in hernia surgery as it helps to reduce recurrence, yet the method of fixation of mesh may cause pain after surgery. In laparoscopic hernia repair, surgeon uses different methods to fix the mesh in large hernia defects or bilateral inguinal hernias. Progrip is a special mesh developed by manufacturer that it can be self-gripped to tissue, as a result no fixation is required after placement. There are few data about Progrip in laparoscopic hernia repair. In this randomized controlled trial we would like to compare the use of Progrip with the "conventional" mesh in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surgery is performed in the usual manner; prior to placement of mesh, surgeon will get the randomization result for that particular patient: Progrip and non-Progrip group. No fixation is required for Progrip group, while fixation with fibrin glue is needed for non-Progrip group. Intraoperative data (e.g. mesh deployment time, operative time, etc) will be collected. Patients will be assessed in clinic at 2-week, 3-month, 6-month and 1-year interval after surgery. Additional visits may be arranged if considered necessary. At follow up patient will be seen by surgeon first to review the wound condition and to look for any recurrence; while other post-operative data including total analgesic usage (number of tablets), return to normal activities (days), return to work (days), pain score etc will be assessed and recorded by a trained nurse who is blinded to the treatment that patient received. Any hernia recurrence will be recorded and treated accordingly. Primary aim of this study is to look for any difference of the 2 groups in terms of postoperative pain and quality of life scores.
Detailed Description
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the common surgeries performed by general surgeon all over the world. Tension-free Lichtenstein repair is the most common technique used in open repair, while many surgeons perform laparoscopic hernia repair: total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP). Laparoscopic surgery is considered to reduce postoperative pain, the incidence of wound complications and time to return to activities of daily living. Both techniques are based on the principle of tension free repair and rely on mesh placement in the preperitoneal space to exclude the inguinal defect and reinforce the abdominal wall; the recurrence rate following tension-free hernia repair is reported to be low and in the range of 1-4%. Chronic pain after an inguinal hernia repair is a well recognized complication, irrespective of technique. The incidence of chronic pain is estimated to be around 5-10%. Many factors contributed to the development of chronic pain, and one of the factors being the type of mesh fixation method. Common types of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic hernia repair are traumatic fixation - the use of tacks (absorbable or non-absorbable) or atraumatic fixation, e.g. the use of fibrin glue; while some surgeons do not fix the mesh. No fixation is practiced by some surgeons in unilateral repair as some studies showed that there was no difference in recurrence rate and incidence of chronic pain between fixation or no fixation groups, yet in these studies hernia opening was small (<3cm) or not measured. It is generally agreed that fixation is indicated in large hernias (defect size >3cm), bilateral hernias and recurrent hernias in order to avoid early mesh dislocation and hernia recurrence. Study has shown that the use of tacks caused more early postoperative pain. Manufacturers try to develop self-gripping mesh with the aim to reduce chronic pain. ProgripTM (Covidien) is a lightweight, self-gripping mesh composed of monofilament polyester and polylactic acid (PLA) microgrips indicated for inguinal hernia repair. The resorbable microgrips provide immediate adherence to surrounding muscle and adipose tissue during hernia surgery, as a result no fixation method is required. Studies have shown that ProgripTM is associated with less pain in the early recovery period when used in open Lichtenstein repair, yet there are few studies of ProgripTM in laparoscopic hernia repair. In Hong Kong, TEP is the preferred approach for most surgeons who perform laparoscopic hernia surgery. In this trial, patients with inguinal hernia who is suitable for TEP are recruited. TEP will be performed in the usual manner. Surgeon will assess the size of hernia defect prior to mesh insertion. For patients with large hernia defect or bilateral inguinal hernia that required mesh fixation, they will be randomized in two groups: ProgripTM and non-ProgripTM group. For ProgripTM no addition fixation is necessary, while for non-ProgripTM fixation is indicated. As tacks are known to be associated with postoperative pain, fibrin glue is designated as the fixation method in non- ProgripTM group in this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hernia, Inguinal
Keywords
self-gripping mesh, fibrin glue, total extraperitoneal

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Progrip
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The Progrip group is the intervention group. Patients will undergo laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. The surgeon will use a self-gripping mesh to repair the hernia. No fixation is required for the mesh.
Arm Title
Non-Progrip
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The Non-Progrip group is the control group. Operation is performed under general anesthesia. A standard three-trocar technique is used: one infra-umbilical camera trocar (1cm) and two 5mm trocars placed at midline between the umbilicus and pubic bone (or one at the side of inguinal hernia). A laparoscope is inserted to the preperitoneal space through the incision. The space is insufflated with carbon dioxide. Dissection is performed, hernia content (if any) is reduced. A non self-gripping synthetic mesh is placed. Fibrin glue is used for fixation.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Progrip
Intervention Description
Self-fixating mesh
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Non-Progrip
Intervention Description
Non self-fixating mesh with the use of glue
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Chronic pain
Description
Chronic pain after hernia surgery was defined as the presence of pain at rest at the groin area. The severity of pain will be measured by a linear analogue pain score sacle from 0 to 10. Score >= 1 indicate the presence of pain.
Time Frame
3 months post surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
mesh deployment time
Description
the time for mesh deployment during surgery
Time Frame
1 day
Title
intraoperative complications
Description
intraoperative complications
Time Frame
1 day
Title
hernia recurrence rate
Description
hernia recurrence rate
Time Frame
1 year
Title
quality of life
Description
quality of life scores
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age≥18 Unilateral inguinal hernia with large hernia defect size (>3cm) Bilateral inguinal hernias American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: 1-2 Provision of written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Any prior surgery for ipsilateral inguinal hernia (i.e. recurrent inguinal hernia) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: 3 or above History of major abdominal surgery that may result in difficulty in development of preperitoneal space Subject is pregnant or breast feeding Any serious concomitant illness with short life expectancy Subject who is not able to attend follow up postoperatively
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dominic, Chi Chung Foo, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Hong Kong
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tung Wah Hospital
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25519425
Citation
Bresnahan E, Bates A, Wu A, Reiner M, Jacob B. The use of self-gripping (Progrip) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2690-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3991-y. Epub 2014 Dec 18. Erratum In: Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2697.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22453675
Citation
Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S, Schule S, Appel P, Ziprin P, Eklund A, Miserez M, Smeds S. Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex ProGrip polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0900-y. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21487873
Citation
Teng YJ, Pan SM, Liu YL, Yang KH, Zhang YC, Tian JH, Han JX. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2849-58. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1668-3. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20714896
Citation
Tam KW, Liang HH, Chai CY. Outcomes of staple fixation of mesh versus nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):3065-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0760-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21997807
Citation
Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Heniford TB. Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):709-14; discussion 714-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182359d07.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19636493
Citation
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18283518
Citation
Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T, Fortelny R, Hollinsky C, Kawji R, Steiner E, Pernthaler H, Fugger R, Scheyer M. Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia. 2008 Aug;12(4):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20703474
Citation
Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO, Hurley M. Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):3059-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0730-y.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20395851
Citation
Langeveld HR, van't Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, Steyerberg EW, Lange J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010 May;251(5):819-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d96c32.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19106673
Citation
Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819255d0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18810548
Citation
Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3,100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc. 2009 Mar;23(3):482-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0118-3. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20552368
Citation
Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H. Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14533902
Citation
Rutkow IM. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Oct;83(5):1045-51, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00132-4.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Different Meshes in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs