search
Back to results

Study of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Primary Purpose

Hernia, Inguinal, Inguinal Hernia, Direct, Inguinal Hernia, Indirect

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TEP without fixation
TEP with fixation
TAPP without fixation
TAPP with fixation
Sponsored by
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hernia, Inguinal focused on measuring laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, total extraperitoneoscopic hernia repair, transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair, inguinal hernia, laparoscopy, hernia repair, herniorraphy, laparoscopic surgery

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • unilateral hernia
  • uncomplicated hernia
  • medical fitness for general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unfit for general anesthesia
  • complicated hernia
  • uncorrectable coagulopathy
  • BMI > 35
  • concomitant pathologies requiring simultaneous surgery
  • bilateral hernia

Sites / Locations

  • Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

TEP without fixation

TEP with fixation

TAPP without fixation

TAPP with fixation

Arm Description

Standard totally extraperitoneoscopic preperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair without mesh fixation

Standard totally extraperitoneoscopic preperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair

Standard transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair without mesh fixation

Standard transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change from preoperative pain levels at 2 years assessed by the visual analogue pain scale (VAS)
neuralgia, inguinal
Change from preoperative pain levels at 1 year assessed by the VAS
neuralgia, inguinal
Change from preoperative pain levels at 6 months assessed by the VAS
neuralgia, inguinal
Change from preoperative pain levels at 3 months assessed by the VAS
neuralgia, inguinal
Change from preoperative pain levels at 1 month assessed by the VAS
neuralgia, inguinal
Change from preoperative pain levels at 1 week assessed by the VAS
neuralgia, inguinal

Secondary Outcome Measures

Total hospital costs
consisted all costs of hospital stays and outpatient treatments
conversion rate
conversion to open surgery
recurrence rate
clinical and radiological diagnosed
rate of minor and major complications
it was assessed as; no complication, minor complications, major complications and complications needed reoperation

Full Information

First Posted
September 22, 2016
Last Updated
September 29, 2016
Sponsor
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
Collaborators
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Bahçeşehir University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02920307
Brief Title
Study of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Official Title
Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study Comparing Fixation Versus no Fixation of Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
Collaborators
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Bahçeşehir University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Although mesh fixation has been associated to an increased incidence of nerve injury and involves increased operative costs, many surgeons feel that fixation is necessary to reduce the risk of hernia recurrence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic herniorrhaphies performed with and without mesh fixation at our institution.
Detailed Description
A randomized prospective study was conducted. Four groups of patients were constituted: (1) TEP with mesh fixation (2) TEP without fixation, (3) TAPP with mesh fixation, (4) TAPP without fixation. 120 patients were randomized to each group. The principal outcomes assessed were postoperative chronic groin pain assessed by visual analogue pain scale (VAS), hernia recurrence, other morbidity rates and hospital costs. Patients were reviewed in outpatient unit at 1 week and at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hernia, Inguinal, Inguinal Hernia, Direct, Inguinal Hernia, Indirect, Hernia, Femoral, Recurrence, Neuralgia, Atypical, Neuralgia, Ilioinguinal, Neuralgia, Iliohypogastric Nerve
Keywords
laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, total extraperitoneoscopic hernia repair, transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair, inguinal hernia, laparoscopy, hernia repair, herniorraphy, laparoscopic surgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TEP without fixation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Standard totally extraperitoneoscopic preperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair without mesh fixation
Arm Title
TEP with fixation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard totally extraperitoneoscopic preperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair
Arm Title
TAPP without fixation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Standard transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair without mesh fixation
Arm Title
TAPP with fixation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TEP without fixation
Other Intervention Name(s)
TEP no fixation
Intervention Description
Standard totally extraperitoneal preperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TEP with fixation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Standard TEP
Intervention Description
Standard totally extraperitoneal preperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TAPP without fixation
Other Intervention Name(s)
TAPP no fixation
Intervention Description
Standard transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TAPP with fixation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Standard TAPP
Intervention Description
Standard transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from preoperative pain levels at 2 years assessed by the visual analogue pain scale (VAS)
Description
neuralgia, inguinal
Time Frame
preoperative and postoperative 2nd year
Title
Change from preoperative pain levels at 1 year assessed by the VAS
Description
neuralgia, inguinal
Time Frame
preoperative and postoperative 1st year
Title
Change from preoperative pain levels at 6 months assessed by the VAS
Description
neuralgia, inguinal
Time Frame
preoperative and postoperative 6th month
Title
Change from preoperative pain levels at 3 months assessed by the VAS
Description
neuralgia, inguinal
Time Frame
preoperative and postoperative 3th month
Title
Change from preoperative pain levels at 1 month assessed by the VAS
Description
neuralgia, inguinal
Time Frame
preoperative and postoperative 1 month
Title
Change from preoperative pain levels at 1 week assessed by the VAS
Description
neuralgia, inguinal
Time Frame
preoperative and postoperative 1th week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total hospital costs
Description
consisted all costs of hospital stays and outpatient treatments
Time Frame
up to 24 months
Title
conversion rate
Description
conversion to open surgery
Time Frame
through the first day
Title
recurrence rate
Description
clinical and radiological diagnosed
Time Frame
up to 24 months
Title
rate of minor and major complications
Description
it was assessed as; no complication, minor complications, major complications and complications needed reoperation
Time Frame
2 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: unilateral hernia uncomplicated hernia medical fitness for general anesthesia Exclusion Criteria: unfit for general anesthesia complicated hernia uncorrectable coagulopathy BMI > 35 concomitant pathologies requiring simultaneous surgery bilateral hernia
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mehmet Kaplan, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Onder Ozcan, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Mugla University, School of Medicine
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
City
Gaziantep
ZIP/Postal Code
27090
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes

Learn more about this trial

Study of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs